littlelunchbox Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 santon would an awesome right winger though. i laugh at people saying santon is better than raylor at left back, yet they want santon to play at right back. who you want as left back then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Ferguson? EDIT: Or Taylor, considering there would be no real contradiction Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 I'd take Ferguson over Raylor at LB 7 days a week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 How about moving Santon to RCB as Williamson is gash? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 santon would an awesome right winger though. i laugh at people saying santon is better than raylor at left back, yet they want santon to play at right back. who you want as left back then? A new signing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Although he's not skinny he is abit weak. Handsome fella like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spudwiser Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 I'd take Ferguson over Raylor at LB 7 days a week. Whats the justifaication for this though? apart from seeing him in flashes at LM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 I'd take Ferguson over Raylor at LB 7 days a week. Whats the justifaication for this though? apart from seeing him in flashes at LM. Ferguson's streets ahead with the ball at his feet, and I'm not convinced Raylor is a better defender either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 I'd take Ferguson over Raylor at LB 7 days a week. Whats the justifaication for this though? apart from seeing him in flashes at LM. The fact that Raylor is a shocking defender, too slow, and overall a poor footballer. Ferguson can't be any worse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Is Raylor at LB worse than Simpson at RB? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Is Raylor at LB worse than Simpson at RB? Yes, imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Defensively, yes. Offensively, no. Overall, depends on the opponents. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlelunchbox Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 santon would an awesome right winger though. i laugh at people saying santon is better than raylor at left back, yet they want santon to play at right back. who you want as left back then? A new signing. lol newsflash, transfer window is closed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Then stop expecting different opinions from the ones you laugh at. Santon is both our best RB and LB, how fucking hilarious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainhaircut Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Then stop expecting different opinions from the ones you laugh at. Santon is both our best RB and LB, how fucking hilarious. No chance. Ben Arfa is our best RB and LB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlelunchbox Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Then stop expecting different opinions from the ones you laugh at. Santon is both our best RB and LB, how f***ing hilarious. oh dear someone's mad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Lovely ball player but really needs to work on his defending. Got tore apart by Walcott at times in the first half and should have done much better on the cross for the first goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Got caught out of position once or twice and should not have been drawn out wide and caught out for their first. But he at least showed he had the pace to keep up with Walcott and there were 2 or 3 times that perch dived in on walcott as the ball was played into him and got completely taken out the game. So in no way do i think Santon was worse than Perch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VaVaVoom Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Is a bit shit at LB if we are honest like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Got caught out of position once or twice and should not have been drawn out wide and caught out for their first. But he at least showed he had the pace to keep up with Walcott and there were 2 or 3 times that perch dived in on walcott as the ball was played into him and got completely taken out the game. So in no way do i think Santon was worse than Perch. Totally agree. I don't see why Santon gets ripped apart, when there are players who did much worse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Didn't think he did too badly tonight and was surprised he was replaced, although Perch generally played pretty well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlelunchbox Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Got caught out of position once or twice and should not have been drawn out wide and caught out for their first. But he at least showed he had the pace to keep up with Walcott and there were 2 or 3 times that perch dived in on walcott as the ball was played into him and got completely taken out the game. So in no way do i think Santon was worse than Perch. dear oh dear Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 First season, young lad, likes to attack. Not a problem, just let him play and improve. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Got caught out of position once or twice and should not have been drawn out wide and caught out for their first. But he at least showed he had the pace to keep up with Walcott and there were 2 or 3 times that perch dived in on walcott as the ball was played into him and got completely taken out the game. So in no way do i think Santon was worse than Perch. dear oh dear Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 He has a lot to learn but we knew that when we signed him. Good technically, good physical attributes on their own but as of yet unrefined, suspect positional sense. Next year he'll be excellent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now