Ronaldo Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 Imagine being so bankrupt for positive PR that you resort to mentioning rugby league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 Disco wrote that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 Oh well. Skimming through, I believed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 must have the only owner who does not or is not interested in a trip to Wembley to win some silverware and have a team to be proud of ,surely getting Charnley and his minnions to spout the "no interest in cup competitions" is against the rules when you blatantly flaunt it in fans forums and is that not something the F.A should pick up on ? .Our record in the F.A cup should be proof of that with weakened teams in every single 3rd round tie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 The fan's forum is on Monday, imagine they will be first shown to members then and then released the following day. Unless Villa maul us 4-0 and then they have to put it back another week like they did this week due to City. Need some feel good factor to gloss over the hge profits and excuses. Something like an emotional return for Jonas maybe would help...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 Yep UV, It's absolutely wrong, Colo has it right. Buying a player is not an expense, because you change one asset (cash) for another (player registration) of the same value. From that day on, the depreciation of the player in a non-cash expense which impacts the P&L, usually applied on a straight-line basis over the contract life- the profile can be re-based if the player gets a new deal. I also don't think you can divorce operations and transfer activity, unless you can confidently state that a club can consistently produce youth players or find free transfers which will produce results sufficient to maintain revenue streams (ie stay in the PL). If a club has an operating profit of £5m a year but has to spend £10m each year on players to stay in the PL, that I don't think you can label that as sustainable. Yeah, my mistake. You're right, it's a depreciable asset otherwise you're allowing clubs to deduct taxes twice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/newcastle-united/11441308/Newcastle-United-set-to-announce-bigger-profits-than-top-Premier-League-and-Champions-League-clubs.html Yawn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ConnyBongo Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 Decent news, more bothered about the problems on the pitch. Or the problem just by the side of pitch for that matter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 I'm buzzin off it personally. Don't get me wrong, so am I. I think we're that used to it that some of us are becoming arrogant about it and expect it as a god given right. I now know how it must have felt when Man U were winning trophies season after season and I think that breeds arrogance, rightly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 Decent news, more bothered about the problems on the pitch. Or the problem just by the side of pitch for that matter. You can't have everything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Complicated: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/rangers/11443457/.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Complicated: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/rangers/11443457/.html I still think his arse kicking at rangers will somehow have a negative effect on us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Complicated: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/rangers/11443457/.html I still think his arse kicking at rangers will somehow have a negative effect on us It's not anywhere near an arse kicking, he still controls all the bits that make money and holds security over the assets, win win for Mikey boy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Complicated: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/rangers/11443457/.html I still think his arse kicking at rangers will somehow have a negative effect on us It's not anywhere near an arse kicking, he still controls all the bits that make money and holds security over the assets, win win for Mikey boy. Exactly. There's no way he's not coming out of this massively in credit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 He'll probably do something daft like buy Gateshead or something. LOL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Pinkman Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 When are these finances released? Cant wait its our new cup final Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gleebals Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 How we people feel if he has wiped say £30M of the debt owed to him? I personally would not have in issue IF he was investing a similar amount back into the team. Would seem a bit strange IMO if he does neither! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 I know relegation is mainly down to him but I've got no issue with him taking his loan back from us. He can still spend far more than he has though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 Yup - no issues with the loan being paid back at all. What my problem is, that it's being used as an excuse for him to exploit the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 Yup - no issues with the loan being paid back at all. What my problem is, that it's being used as an excuse for him to exploit the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Dave King claims in a statement he has won a 'landslide victory' and is on the verge of taking control of @RangersFC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varadi Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/312447-dave-king-announces-landslide-win-in-bid-to-take-control-of-rangers/? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 I wonder if we will be hit by Ashley's retribution. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 How we people feel if he has wiped say £30M of the debt owed to him? I personally would not have in issue IF he was investing a similar amount back into the team. Would seem a bit strange IMO if he does neither! I've said it before, but the interest free nature of the loan is being used by the club as a justification for SD's free sponsorship. For that reason repaying the loan in part should only be acceptable if it meant SD starts to pay for the privilege of soiling SJP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 How we people feel if he has wiped say £30M of the debt owed to him? I personally would not have in issue IF he was investing a similar amount back into the team. Would seem a bit strange IMO if he does neither! I've said it before, but the interest free nature of the loan is being used by the club as a justification for SD's free sponsorship. For that reason repaying the loan in part should only be acceptable if it meant SD starts to pay for the privilege of soiling SJP. Remember when people were saying SD will be paying for the space and the naming rights :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts