Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest bimpy474

I'd sell to anyone to get this poisonous rat away from the running of this club;  Al-Queida, anyone.

 

At least we could expect an occasional trip to the twin towers.

 

http://gifsforum.com/images/gif/shocked/grand/95262675-shocked-reaction.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd sell to anyone to get this poisonous rat away from the running of this club;  Al-Queida, anyone.

 

At least we could expect an occasional trip to the twin towers.

 

Yeaaaah, that's a bit much.

 

the 10 year rule

 

Of course, "twin towers" was a name for Wembley years before the NYC incarnation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The negativity which Wonga brings into the club is worth the 4m a year to the fat cunt. He must value pissing us off and seeing Newcastle United's name dragged through the shite more than he values profit. What other explanation could there be , if true , of course?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Course its not true, Virgin said they'd match what Wonga had to offer if we'd had spoken to them first. If it was less they'd have said so. Dear me, any old shite gets past of as fact these days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

Does that figure include the naming rights and the money they are supposed to be investing in local area and the academy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Course its not true, Virgin said they'd match what Wonga had to offer if we'd had spoken to them first. If it was less they'd have said so. Dear me, any old s**** gets past of as fact these days.

 

Take it up with the site they got the information from Bergerac  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Course its not true, Virgin said they'd match what Wonga had to offer if we'd had spoken to them first. If it was less they'd have said so. Dear me, any old shite gets past of as fact these days.

 

Virgin were never informed how much Wonga were willing to pay, they were simply told that the deal would be ending and the club weren't prepared to listen to an offer from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Course its not true, Virgin said they'd match what Wonga had to offer if we'd had spoken to them first. If it was less they'd have said so. Dear me, any old shite gets past of as fact these days.

 

It says Virgin were never given the opportunity to compete in the article.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Course its not true, Virgin said they'd match what Wonga had to offer if we'd had spoken to them first. If it was less they'd have said so. Dear me, any old shite gets past of as fact these days.

 

The article says otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Course its not true, Virgin said they'd match what Wonga had to offer if we'd had spoken to them first. If it was less they'd have said so. Dear me, any old shite gets past of as fact these days.

 

Virgin were never informed how much Wonga were willing to pay, they were simply told that the deal would be ending and the club weren't prepared to listen to an offer from them.

 

That is correct, they also said they would have been willing to match any offer. This was after the Wonga deal was announced, therefore they could have easily stuck the boot in and said why accept a lower offer, which no one mentioned at all at the time?

 

It is also widely accepted we are receiving £8m a year without any clauses while receiving addons for the youth academy and other projects. So the article is wrong however you look at it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Course its not true, Virgin said they'd match what Wonga had to offer if we'd had spoken to them first. If it was less they'd have said so. Dear me, any old shite gets past of as fact these days.

 

Virgin were never informed how much Wonga were willing to pay, they were simply told that the deal would be ending and the club weren't prepared to listen to an offer from them.

 

That is correct, they also said they would have been willing to match any offer. This was after the Wonga deal was announced, therefore they could have easily stuck the boot in and said why accept a lower offer, which no one mentioned at all at the time?

 

It is also widely accepted we are receiving £8m a year without any clauses while receiving addons for the youth academy and other projects. So the article is wrong however you look at it.

 

I didn't hear that bit, and it's easy for them to say that after the fact, but do we really think they would have matched ANY offer? Not a very clever way to run a business. I'm still not seeing anything that makes me think Virgin knew how much Wonga were paying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Course its not true, Virgin said they'd match what Wonga had to offer if we'd had spoken to them first. If it was less they'd have said so. Dear me, any old shite gets past of as fact these days.

 

Virgin were never informed how much Wonga were willing to pay, they were simply told that the deal would be ending and the club weren't prepared to listen to an offer from them.

 

That is correct, they also said they would have been willing to match any offer. This was after the Wonga deal was announced, therefore they could have easily stuck the boot in and said why accept a lower offer, which no one mentioned at all at the time?

 

It is also widely accepted we are receiving £8m a year without any clauses while receiving addons for the youth academy and other projects. So the article is wrong however you look at it.

 

I didn't hear that bit, and it's easy for them to say that after the fact, but do we really think they would have matched ANY offer? Not a very clever way to run a business. I'm still not seeing anything that makes me think Virgin knew how much Wonga were paying.

 

They didn't it was done behind their backs but after the deal came to light they said this, they could have easily said why stop a deal and accept less? There would have been a massive kick off on here and in the media ans why I know it didn't happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You heard of something called a law binding agreement? That's what happens on multi million deals.

 

:facepalm:

 

Have you heard yourself man? All of you. Mike Ashley the man obsessed with money goes out of his way to accept a lower offer to what, piss off the fans and drag the name of the club through the mud because its good advertising  :lol:

 

Any more conspiracies you got while we are at it? Mike Ashley behind 9/11 so he could sell more secure luggage? He invented Bird Flu so he could sell trainers to run away from swans?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You heard of something called a law binding agreement? That's what happens on multi million deals.

 

:facepalm:

 

Have you heard yourself man? All of you. Mike Ashley the man obsessed with money goes out of his way to accept a lower offer to what, p*ss off the fans and drag the name of the club through the mud because its good advertising  :lol:

 

Any more conspiracies you got while we are at it? Mike Ashley behind 9/11 so he could sell more secure luggage? He invented Bird Flu so he could sell trainers to run away from swans?

 

 

Calling Womblemaster!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...