Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Good that we've moved on from complaining about spending nothing to complaining about spending £30m.

If we signed 8 players for £30m we'd have to be doing pretty darn well to be successful with that 8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it'll be the same 30m ish spent on 6-8 players to try and fumble through the season with the hope of unearthing another ayoze or selling a sissoko

 

Except we spent nowhere near that last summer.

 

You can take away about £11m combined from the Riviere and Cabella deals.

 

how much did we spend?  am i quoting the figures including colbacks wages for the length of his contract etc.? :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on rumoured fees it was about £30-£35m.  Take away sales that summer and you're down to around £20m.  Take away the January sale of Cabaye you're roughly breaking even.

 

It's not an honest argument to complain about Cabaye's sale contributing to both huge profits in 13/14 and a break even net spend in 14/15.

 

Cabaye Profits from 13/14 led to a £21.4m net spend in 14/15.

 

http://i61.tinypic.com/9773ip.png

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest chopey

Richest dude in China looking for a club. Sell up Ashley you prat.

 

Send him an email of the beautiful entrance gate into Stowel Street he'll be here in a shot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Richest dude in China looking for a club. Sell up Ashley you prat.

 

Send him an email of the beautiful entrance gate into Stowel Street he'll be here in a shot

 

:lol: Quick, we need a put a dossier together!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone read this?

 

http://www.themag.co.uk/2015/03/must-read-the-invasion-of-the-football-club-snatchers/

 

Whilst I agree with the sentiment, it reads like it's been written by a developmentally challenged 4 year old. The Mag has nee standards whatsoever.

 

Absolutely the editorial standards have slipped massively since the mag went digital. Any old crap will make it now, which was not the case when it had a hard copy.

 

Some of the stuff on there now is epidemically bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone read this?

 

http://www.themag.co.uk/2015/03/must-read-the-invasion-of-the-football-club-snatchers/

 

Whilst I agree with the sentiment, it reads like it's been written by a developmentally challenged 4 year old. The Mag has nee standards whatsoever.

 

Absolutely the editorial standards have slipped massively since the mag went digital. Any old crap will make it now, which was not the case when it had a hard copy.

 

Some of the stuff on there now is epidemically bad.

 

http://i.imgur.com/tnPYGr8.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone read this?

 

http://www.themag.co.uk/2015/03/must-read-the-invasion-of-the-football-club-snatchers/

 

Whilst I agree with the sentiment, it reads like it's been written by a developmentally challenged 4 year old. The Mag has nee standards whatsoever.

 

Absolutely the editorial standards have slipped massively since the mag went digital. Any old crap will make it now, which was not the case when it had a hard copy.

 

Some of the stuff on there now is epidemically bad.

 

http://i.imgur.com/tnPYGr8.gif

 

:lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...