Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A formal announcement of what has unofficially been known for some considerable time is of some interest - but perhaps more significantly, invalidates all recent claims of takeover bids and ongoing interest.

Quite simply were Amanda Staveley, those mysterious Chinese bidders or anyone else to have had a genuine interest in the club, this statement wouldn't exist.

That it does is confirmation that an awful lot of speculation masquerading as knowledge has been foisted on Newcastle supporters in recent weeks.

:thup:

Whole thing is bollocks IMO

Link to post
Share on other sites

A formal announcement of what has unofficially been known for some considerable time is of some interest - but perhaps more significantly, invalidates all recent claims of takeover bids and ongoing interest.

 

Quite simply were Amanda Staveley, those mysterious Chinese bidders or anyone else to have had a genuine interest in the club, this statement wouldn't exist.

 

That it does is confirmation that an awful lot of speculation masquerading as knowledge has been foisted on Newcastle supporters in recent weeks.

 

Or there is a buyer and hes  pushing this out there officially to speed up the sale/force it through to worry the potential buyer of a rival (s).

Link to post
Share on other sites

A formal announcement of what has unofficially been known for some considerable time is of some interest - but perhaps more significantly, invalidates all recent claims of takeover bids and ongoing interest.

 

Quite simply were Amanda Staveley, those mysterious Chinese bidders or anyone else to have had a genuine interest in the club, this statement wouldn't exist.

 

That it does is confirmation that an awful lot of speculation masquerading as knowledge has been foisted on Newcastle supporters in recent weeks.

 

Or there is a buyer and hes  pushing this out there officially to speed up the sale/force it through to worry the potential buyer of a rival (s).

 

Nah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Staveley was definately at the game. The rest was always just wild speculation

Exactly, at the end of the day, no one has a clue, what we do know is he's officially put the club up for sale, and whats the club sold before Christmas. That is great news, not really sure why people what to see this as a negative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A formal announcement of what has unofficially been known for some considerable time is of some interest - but perhaps more significantly, invalidates all recent claims of takeover bids and ongoing interest.

 

Quite simply were Amanda Staveley, those mysterious Chinese bidders or anyone else to have had a genuine interest in the club, this statement wouldn't exist.

 

That it does is confirmation that an awful lot of speculation masquerading as knowledge has been foisted on Newcastle supporters in recent weeks.

 

Or there is a buyer and hes  pushing this out there officially to speed up the sale/force it through to worry the potential buyer of a rival (s).

Imagine trying to ignite a bidding war between a legitimate buyer and hypothetical buyers who need an installment plan :lol:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting views on here and RTG about this news, and in many ways polar opposites.

 

Some RTG suggestions even proposed that Ashley should sell Newcastle and buy Sunderland, or that they wish that Short would buy Newcastle.  These comments made me think about how each owner is perceived by each club and what they have done from a business perspective. (Yes, we know that Short buying Newcastle was intended to assume that Short would have the same effect on Newcastle finances as he did on Sunderland). But actually, might the crazy scenario of the owners swapping clubs actually give the other club what it needs?

 

This board sees Ashley as someone who has taken the club backwards, in its ability to compete in the premier league, and he is hated by fans.

RTG look at Ashley and see that he  has put the club on a firm financial footing making NUFC financially self-sufficient. A few comments that they would like him to be their owner.

 

Whereas, RTG see Short as the guy who destroyed Sunderland by chasing PL rainbows and building insurmountable levels of debt, while we might look at Short as the type of owner that would invest/spend money where there a good possibility of a return on that investment.  I think he has been a good owner for them, but has been misled and let down by his board, managers and players. (His mistake, is not cutting off the money flow earlier)

 

So what if….

What if Ashley did sell Newcastle, and buy Sunderland.  Ashely would immediately put them on a financial plan to stability, and he would take a relegation (or two) to ensure that they are financially viable.  Never going to reach for the moon in terms of league placement but would invest enough to get into the Premier League and would be happy with lower-mid Prem League position.

 

And while Shorts failing has not been about the money spent (because he has spent and spent), but what it was spent on and by who.  With Short’s willingness to invest, wouldn’t he love to have the recruitment plan and manager from Newcastle that’s able to spend on the right players and have a positive cash flow?

 

Not that I want this to happen or believe that it would happen, but there is a certain symmetry that each club might just have what the other club needs.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think an offer is on the table that is way below what Ashley wants, so he is using his vast business experience (and a 14 year old lawyer) to flush out the rest 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A formal announcement of what has unofficially been known for some considerable time is of some interest - but perhaps more significantly, invalidates all recent claims of takeover bids and ongoing interest.

 

Quite simply were Amanda Staveley, those mysterious Chinese bidders or anyone else to have had a genuine interest in the club, this statement wouldn't exist.

 

That it does is confirmation that an awful lot of speculation masquerading as knowledge has been foisted on Newcastle supporters in recent weeks.

 

Or there is a buyer and hes  pushing this out there officially to speed up the sale/force it through to worry the potential buyer of a rival (s).

Imagine trying to ignite a bidding war between a legitimate buyer and hypothetical buyers who need an installment plan :lol:

 

True :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting views on here and RTG about this news, and in many ways polar opposites.

 

Some RTG suggestions even proposed that Ashley should sell Newcastle and buy Sunderland, or that they wish that Short would buy Newcastle.  These comments made me think about how each owner is perceived by each club and what they have done from a business perspective. (Yes, we know that Short buying Newcastle was intended to assume that Short would have the same effect on Newcastle finances as he did on Sunderland). But actually, might the crazy scenario of the owners swapping clubs actually give the other club what it needs?

 

This board sees Ashley as someone who has taken the club backwards, in its ability to compete in the premier league, and he is hated by fans.

RTG look at Ashley and see that he  has put the club on a firm financial footing making NUFC financially self-sufficient. A few comments that they would like him to be their owner.

 

Whereas, RTG see Short as the guy who destroyed Sunderland by chasing PL rainbows and building insurmountable levels of debt, while we might look at Short as the type of owner that would invest/spend money where there a good possibility of a return on that investment.  I think he has been a good owner for them, but has been misled and let down by his board, managers and players. (His mistake, is not cutting off the money flow earlier)

 

So what if….

What if Ashley did sell Newcastle, and buy Sunderland.  Ashely would immediately put them on a financial plan to stability, and he would take a relegation (or two) to ensure that they are financially viable.  Never going to reach for the moon in terms of league placement but would invest enough to get into the Premier League and would be happy with lower-mid Prem League position.

 

And while Shorts failing has not been about the money spent (because he has spent and spent), but what it was spent on and by who.  With Short’s willingness to invest, wouldn’t he love to have the recruitment plan and manager from Newcastle that’s able to spend on the right players and have a positive cash flow?

 

Not that I want this to happen or believe that it would happen, but there is a certain symmetry that each club might just have what the other club needs.

 

Exiled from Posting tbh  :dowiespin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...