Jump to content

Papiss Cissé


Guest kingdawson

Happy Cisse has left?  

239 members have voted

  1. 1. Happy Cisse has left?

    • Yes
      2
    • No
      5


Recommended Posts

Because he actually participates in the build up unlike Bent and that touch and pass to Gouffran for our 2nd goal last week is something Bent is not capable of.

 

He was good in the first half when we actually played quite close to him, he struggled when there was a massive gap between him and the rest. ( unsurprisingly)

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is not similar to Darren Bent.

 

How is he not? His game is all about getting in behind the defence, movement off the ball and pure finishing with head or feet.

 

Also, like Bent, he seems effective only when played as a lone striker. I don't think they're all that similar, but there certainly are comparisons to be made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because he actually participates in the build up unlike Bent and that touch and pass to Gouffran for our 2nd goal last week is something Bent is not capable of.

 

He was good in the first half when we actually played quite close to him, he struggled when there was a massive gap between him and the rest. ( unsurprisingly)

 

So would it be fair to see he's not an ideal striker in a 451 where we're up against stronger opposition and expecting to be under the cosh quite a bit, seeing as he doesn't seem to be the type of forward who is capable of creating something on his own at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because he actually participates in the build up unlike Bent and that touch and pass to Gouffran for our 2nd goal last week is something Bent is not capable of.

 

He was good in the first half when we actually played quite close to him, he struggled when there was a massive gap between him and the rest. ( unsurprisingly)

 

So would it be fair to see he's not an ideal striker in a 451 where we're up against stronger opposition and expecting to be under the cosh quite a bit, seeing as he doesn't seem to be the type of forward who is capable of creating something on his own at all?

 

I would agree with that which is why i now agree some quality competition would be nice. I do find these Bent comparisons a bit sickening though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like Bent could have sent Gouffran clear last week with that wonderful piece of link up play.

 

How embarrassing to see our own supporters making that comparison.

 

If you can't see certain similarities because one is capable of something the other (arguably) isn't, then God help you. Nobody is arguing they're one and the same person FFS :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because he actually participates in the build up unlike Bent and that touch and pass to Gouffran for our 2nd goal last week is something Bent is not capable of.

 

He was good in the first half when we actually played quite close to him, he struggled when there was a massive gap between him and the rest. ( unsurprisingly)

 

So would it be fair to see he's not an ideal striker in a 451 where we're up against stronger opposition and expecting to be under the cosh quite a bit, seeing as he doesn't seem to be the type of forward who is capable of creating something on his own at all?

 

Playing as the 1 in a 4-5-1 against good opposition is more about working very hard for the team than creating something from nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worked hard and his hold up play was a lot better today which is the biggest weakness IMO. The isloation he has seen in the past could be helped by doing what he did today and chest, look for throw ins and corners as well as laying it off when under control to bring others in to the game.

 

If he's only held his run for that split second when he went to early and the score could be so much different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do people want him to do? He is a limited player but such a letal man to have in the box. He should only be in box, help defending and used simply as a targetman.

 

With arfa back he will be better...Jonas does not help him.

 

I Think cisse is really good...a limited player - yes. But with other attacking options and better/more delivery he will be very good!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

He is better than Bent but they are very similar types of striker, both have limited games, only Cisse has less of a limited game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do people want him to do? He is a limited player but such a letal man to have in the box. He should only be in box, help defending and used simply as a targetman.

 

With arfa back he will be better...Jonas does not help him.

 

I Think cisse is really good...a limited player - yes. But with other attacking options and better/more delivery he will be very good!

 

Being lethal in the box would be a start :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This wouldn't even be up for debate if our manager knew how to orchestrate an attacking game plan that gives Cisse the service that he needs.

 

Conversely, the attacking game plan wouldn't even be up for debate if Cisse took the chances that fall to him week in week out, like he did last season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do people want him to do? He is a limited player but such a letal man to have in the box. He should only be in box, help defending and used simply as a targetman.

 

With arfa back he will be better...Jonas does not help him.

 

I Think cisse is really good...a limited player - yes. But with other attacking options and better/more delivery he will be very good!

 

Being lethal in the box would be a start :lol:

 

Would be good if wasn't instructed to be on the half way line instead of in the box..... he's hardly ever in the box because of Pardew tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like Bent could have sent Gouffran clear last week with that wonderful piece of link up play.

 

How embarrassing to see our own supporters making that comparison.

 

Agreed.

Embarrassing. :lol: Both are very good players. I think Cisse is slightly better, but they have very similar limitations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do people want him to do? He is a limited player but such a letal man to have in the box. He should only be in box, help defending and used simply as a targetman.

 

With arfa back he will be better...Jonas does not help him.

 

I Think cisse is really good...a limited player - yes. But with other attacking options and better/more delivery he will be very good!

 

Being lethal in the box would be a start :lol:

 

Would be good if wasn't instructed to be on the half way line instead of in the box..... he's hardly ever in the box because of Pardew tbh.

 

Rubbish. Which striker ever stays in the box all game long? Cisse would just be offside even more than he is already.. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...