TRon Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 The thing I don't understand is why the other Muslims in our squad - Tiote and Ben Arfa - haven't kicked up the same amount of fuss if money lending at a rate of interest represents such a fundamental breach of Sharia law. I don't know it's a strange one. Sometimes I hear Muslims don't drink alcohol but then I see them out on the town throwing back tequila slammers and snorting coke. It's so strange how they all act different as if they were individuals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 The thing I don't understand is why the other Muslims in our squad - Tiote and Ben Arfa - haven't kicked up the same amount of fuss if money lending at a rate of interest represents such a fundamental breach of Sharia law. I don't know it's a strange one. Sometimes I hear Muslims don't drink alcohol but then I see them out on the town throwing back tequila slammers and snorting coke. It's so strange how they all act different as if they were individuals. it's like some christians are ok with gay marriage, some aren't. in this case though the stance taken by one is easily shot at. edit, I agree with the missing bit of your post about it possibly looking like an excuse to get out (like n'zogbia and insomniagate). there were rumours a little while back when it kicked off about it not really being him but pressure exerted on his family back in senegal, was this ever chacked out ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 :anguish: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearer9 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 So he is contractually obligated to wear the sponsor's logo? Surely he is now in breach of contract and the club shouldn't be paying him. A later decision to allow him to play without it should see his wage lowered, not raised. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Maybe he's been told that he will play the wide role and Bent as the central one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallsendmag Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 He's using this Wonga sponsorship as an excuse to leave. He was happy to wear the Virgin shirt last season and he's happy to play in the Barclays Premier League and wear their logo on his sleeve and last time I checked they were both in the business of lending money with interest repayable on it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Player acting a bit dumb (hypocritical yes but at least imo a slightly worthy cause, Wonga are a tacky company that prey on the vulnerable) is nothing new in the world of football, and essentially it looks like we're going to lose Cisse due to a sponsor logo row. I don't think it's reasonable to ever be in this position. I know Bent can score goals, but he's still just a f***ing poacher who isn't good enough for aston f***ing villa. Cisse may not be much more varied is his game but I'd like to see Bent try that Chelsea goal (or even Cisse's against Southampton this last season, or that juggle to the right leg against Stoke was it?), and for one Bent is a grumpy run of the mill premier league ego, I have remained deeply fond of Cisse even through his season long rough patch, that run into the crowd when he scored late on versus Fulham was magic. Bent is no upgrade, at best he is the same, he does not improve us, and as we learned last season we have to improve to stand still in the league. We should not be losing a striker who can be as brilliant as he was initially over a f***ing row about sponsors. The one thing I still kinda thought Pardew was ok at was man-management, keeping players on side, this is what we should be doing. Not f***ing ditching him for someone who elicits a shrug and well he'll at least score goals. We should be aiming higher but we're not and we never will be while we are owned by Ashley. May seem a bit longwinded, I think we can survive Cisse leaving alright if we sign Bent and someone better. (Ok much to ask for but we do need a more all round striker). We also need widemen and a Cabaye replacement if he's off. While Ashley is in charge 'this'll do' will be the philosophy for ever more. This seems pretty much symbolic of how much of a shambles our club is run by. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnes23 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 As ever with this club though there's a bigger picture and behind this muslim/Sharia law smokescreen lies another attempt to force Newcastle back to the table with an improved contract for Cisse - or sell him. from .com Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 As ever with this club though there's a bigger picture and behind this muslim/Sharia law smokescreen lies another attempt to force Newcastle back to the table with an improved contract for Cisse - or sell him. from .com Dunno if they know that for certain or if they're just citing the Independent article from a few weeks ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Sick of this shit tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 I wish Cisse would just pack it in like Fuck knows if it's genuine or not, I just wish he would stop it, because I doubt Ashley will. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 If he's using this to get a new contract from Ashley, he's not winning that one. If he did get a new contract somehow, how will it look when he suddenly wears the shirt, nah can't see it being that, it'll all just look ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 If he's using this to get a new contract from Ashley, he's not winning that one. If he did get a new contract somehow, how will it look when he suddenly wears the shirt, nah can't see it being that, it'll all just look ridiculous. I think he's using it to leave, did he look happy last season to you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 If he's using this to get a new contract from Ashley, he's not winning that one. If he did get a new contract somehow, how will it look when he suddenly wears the shirt, nah can't see it being that, it'll all just look ridiculous. I think he's using it to leave, did he look happy last season to you? that wouldn't really matter, only a better offer usually makes players get itchy feet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 If he's using this to get a new contract from Ashley, he's not winning that one. If he did get a new contract somehow, how will it look when he suddenly wears the shirt, nah can't see it being that, it'll all just look ridiculous. I think he's using it to leave, did he look happy last season to you? Nope, he look fecked off. We didn't give him decent service virtually all season long, can't blame him for that. If this is true and he does want to leave, and in that he is indeed using his religion as the lever. He can fuck off, as he's a coward and liar. Think there's more to it tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 If he's using this to get a new contract from Ashley, he's not winning that one. If he did get a new contract somehow, how will it look when he suddenly wears the shirt, nah can't see it being that, it'll all just look ridiculous. I think he's using it to leave, did he look happy last season to you? Nope, he look fecked off. We didn't give him decent service virtually all season long, can't blame him for that. If this is true and he does want to leave, and in that he is indeed using his religion as the lever. He can fuck off, as he's a coward and liar. Think there's more to it tbh. He'd probably have to film himself taking a shit on our club badge for me to have any ill will towards him after his form in the first half season here tbh. I could never hate the man that scored those two goals at Stamford Bridge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 If he's using this to get a new contract from Ashley, he's not winning that one. If he did get a new contract somehow, how will it look when he suddenly wears the shirt, nah can't see it being that, it'll all just look ridiculous. I think he's using it to leave, did he look happy last season to you? Nope, he look fecked off. We didn't give him decent service virtually all season long, can't blame him for that. If this is true and he does want to leave, and in that he is indeed using his religion as the lever. He can fuck off, as he's a coward and liar. Think there's more to it tbh. He'd probably have to film himself taking a shit on our club badge for me to have any ill will towards him after his form in the first half season here tbh. I could never hate the man that scored those two goals at Stamford Bridge. I love him and if Pardew would set the team up to make chances for him, i think he would score tons. Pardew won't and can't as he a complete idiot tactically attacking wise. Pardew.....well what else can be said about him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Yeah I am willing to give Papiss the benefit of any doubt this issue is explained properly. He has earn't that I feel with the way he has conducted himself so far for us. Poor year mainly last year but still came up with some massively crucial goals in the second half of the season despite a criminal lack of service. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 He looked sick as fuck at the end of last season, and who can blame him? The tactics aside, this is what happens when you have a poacher in a team of players who create fuck all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 He looked sick as fuck at the end of last season, and who can blame him? The tactics aside, this is what happens when you have a poacher in a team of players who create fuck all. Yep, spot on. He should just come out and say so and not use a wanky lie. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Cissé is as good as gone. The deal with Wonga was signed in October 2012 so he's know since then that they would be our sponsor. He should hand a transfer request in as there is no way he can get out of wearing the club sponsor on his shirt. If his reasoning for not wanting to wear the Wonga sponsored shirt are "religious grounds" then we know that he is a massive hypocrite. I wonder what a Muslim cleric's views would be on a Muslim going to casinos, smoking with a Hookah pipe, having 'relations' outside of marriage with a non-Muslim, wearing clothing sponsored by money lenders (Northern Rock, Virgin Money & Barclays), working in a place where alcohol is sold and advertised and where gambling is promoted (St James Park), etc. http://www.themag.co.uk/the-mag-articles/ridiculous-interest-rates-is-against-your-principles-then-how-can-anybody-play-in-the-barclays-premier-league/ Ridiculous Interest Rates Against Your Principles – Then How Can Anybody Play In The ‘Barclays’ Premier League? Yesterday by Archie Brand So, Cisse says ‘I object’ and may be given permission to wear a charity shirt. Tiote now feels bad and goes the same way. Followed by Haidara, Ben Arfa and goodness knows how many more, because now it’s not religious. It’s principle – and that’s much more serious. So there’s no reason why Taylor, Colo, Jonas, Krul and the rest should not join in, because lets face it, they would be pretty embarrassed by now, appearing to condone high interest loans. Who is going to sponsor a club’s shirts if the players can just boycott them as they wish, just because they ‘disagree’ with their business practices? For example a player decides that they will not play for a team sponsored by Samsung, because they ‘stole’ a “gesture” from Apple, or Etihad because of UAE human rights issues. Or the plethora of gambling sponsors. Where does it all end? Long and slippery slope guys. Take a look at the number of sponsors that we could take offence to. Open season. If Cisse refuses to wear the Wonga he is quite simply in breach of contract. He either walks or is sacked. And Ashley – regardless of what you may think of him, cannot allow any player to dictate these terms. It’s not about religion now. Shirt sponsorship is a huge money earner (just look at Etihad) and anyone who rocks that particular boat should be turfed overboard. Non- negotiable. Yes – it’s a shame that Mary Poppins didn’t offer to sponsor us, but one minute we are complaining about no money being spent, the next we’re complaining about where it’s coming from. For goodness sake, at which point do we actually take responsibility for our actions and stop blaming the likes of Wonga? We are adults. We know the terms. We make the decisions. Whether it’s high interest loans, casinos, cigarettes or booze, we have to accept the responsibility. Just out of interest – I’ve been plugging away at this one for weeks – Northern Rock and then Virgin Money both charge interest on their products, but nobody objected to that. OK – so here’s the big one. Where do you draw the line? Surely refusing to wear the shirt but continuing to accept the money is major league hypocrisy? (or perhaps that should be Premiere League Hypocrisy?) Are we saying that I’m happy to take the money, as long as I don’t have to wear the shirt, so please just keep giving me the fifty grand a week, because I quite like that part of the deal? If this really is a matter of principle based purely on the concept of interest (which we have already challenged) then I would assume that when he leaves Cisse will not go to another team in the BARCLAYS Premier League, because as far as I can tell, those buggers are still charging me interest on my mortgage. And who would want to be part of that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Yeah I am willing to give Papiss the benefit of any doubt this issue is explained properly. He has earn't that I feel with the way he has conducted himself so far for us. Poor year mainly last year but still came up with some massively crucial goals in the second half of the season despite a criminal lack of service. thing is the cliche used about strikers is that the best take their chances when they come along, last season he didn't. (crikey, reading at home in particular which seemed like a turning point we could/should have been at least 3, hat trick for cisse, by half time) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Agree with nearly all of that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Would Cissé have complained if our new sponsor had been Newcastle Brown Ale and would some fans be so quick to back him as they are over Wonga? Just about every sponsor in the Premiership isn't allowed for Muslims (Banking, gambling, alcohol, etc). A Muslim guy rang into the Football talk on BBC Radio Newcastle today (sometime between 6pm and 7pm) and he said if Cissé was such a devote Muslim he wouldn't appear at Football grounds as alcohol is sold in them all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Would Cissé have complained if our new sponsor had been Newcastle Brown Ale and would some fans be so quick to back him as they are over Wonga? Just about every sponsor in the Premiership isn't allowed for Muslims (Banking, gambling, alcohol, etc). A Muslim guy rang into the Football talk on BBC Radio Newcastle today (sometime between 6pm and 7pm) and he said if Cissé was such a devote Muslim he wouldn't appear at Football grounds as alcohol is sold in them all. would the fans have been so quick to back him had he been a reserve we were looking to offload ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now