Dokko Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Do Chelsea's managers actually get a big say in who they sign? Mourinho had. Scolary I think as well. Deco was his signing, at least. Jose really wanted Shevchenko. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17250464 They're f***ing dicks. He deserved it. Agree, though, they're dicks for sacking Ancelotti. Why? He spent 20 million on David Luiz and 50 mill on Torres. Aye, righto. I spent £70m on them too. Yeah but you didn't though. Neither did he. What he did was win the double in his first season and finish 2nd next time round. If that's worthy of a sacking, sack them all. Actually you're correct. It was 22 mill for s**** Colo. 72 million quid totals. And although I know Ancelotti wasn't sacked for this...with hindsight as a guide, he deserved to be. He deserved to be sacked because Chelsea signed Torres? Get back to your booze, bud. So you know for certain, even though Carlo Ancelotti was the manager of Chelsea Football Club at the time that David Luiz and Fernando Torres signed for them for a combined total of £72 million, that he actually didn't sign them? Have a word man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Despicable tosspot of a club. Why hire someone like him if you're not going to give him time? It's not like they're languishing down the bottom! This player power shit is ruining football. Hope they completely fizzle out and finish 9th or summat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 He's been rubbish, man. Their big mistake was getting him in the first place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17250464 They're f***ing dicks. He deserved it. Agree, though, they're dicks for sacking Ancelotti. Why? He spent 20 million on David Luiz and 50 mill on Torres. Aye, righto. I spent £70m on them too. Yeah but you didn't though. Neither did he. What he did was win the double in his first season and finish 2nd next time round. If that's worthy of a sacking, sack them all. Actually you're correct. It was 22 mill for s**** Colo. 72 million quid totals. And although I know Ancelotti wasn't sacked for this...with hindsight as a guide, he deserved to be. He deserved to be sacked because Chelsea signed Torres? Get back to your booze, bud. So you know for certain, even though Carlo Ancelotti was the manager of Chelsea Football Club at the time that David Luiz and Fernando Torres signed for them for a combined total of £72 million, that he actually didn't sign them? Have a word man. My memory extends to 2011, yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MrSundlofer Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Di Matteo caretaker then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Do Chelsea's managers actually get a big say in who they sign? Mourinho had. Scolary I think as well. Deco was his signing, at least. Jose really wanted Shevchenko. Was the beginning of the end iirc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Do Chelsea's managers actually get a big say in who they sign? Mourinho had. Scolary I think as well. Deco was his signing, at least. Jose really wanted Shevchenko. If Ancelotti hadn't wanted either, then he wouldn't have selected them, but he did play them both regularly. You can however see certain signings that some managers don't want...Keane and Benitez, and to a lesser extent AVB/Cahill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 £13.3 million plus wages and pay-off well spent. Clubs like Chelsea are ruining football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Do Chelsea's managers actually get a big say in who they sign? Mourinho had. Scolary I think as well. Deco was his signing, at least. Schevchenko disagrees. I have my doubts on Ballack too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Do Chelsea's managers actually get a big say in who they sign? Mourinho had. Scolary I think as well. Deco was his signing, at least. Jose really wanted Shevchenko. Was the beginning of the end iirc. Yep. RA doesn't seem to have taking this as a lesson either, something JM would deem as essential if he were to return. Personally I hope he does, great character to have in the league even if he's a dick sometimes, unlike KKK who is a dick all of the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17250464 They're f***ing dicks. He deserved it. Agree, though, they're dicks for sacking Ancelotti. Why? He spent 20 million on David Luiz and 50 mill on Torres. Aye, righto. I spent £70m on them too. Yeah but you didn't though. Neither did he. What he did was win the double in his first season and finish 2nd next time round. If that's worthy of a sacking, sack them all. Actually you're correct. It was 22 mill for s**** Colo. 72 million quid totals. And although I know Ancelotti wasn't sacked for this...with hindsight as a guide, he deserved to be. He deserved to be sacked because Chelsea signed Torres? Get back to your booze, bud. So you know for certain, even though Carlo Ancelotti was the manager of Chelsea Football Club at the time that David Luiz and Fernando Torres signed for them for a combined total of £72 million, that he actually didn't sign them? Have a word man. My memory extends to 2011, yes. He was manager of Chelsea when they signed but he didn't sign them. Forgive me if I appear to be being a thick cunt here but what am I missing? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 *Paying £72m for them (Middle ground that apparently doesn't exist) *Never selecting them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 £13.3 million plus wages and pay-off well spent. Clubs like Chelsea are ruining football. Who knows, without Roman Abramovic, we probably only would have got 15 million for Carroll. He started to ruin the football. Many people have followed him on that. He was just the start of that all.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Do Chelsea's managers actually get a big say in who they sign? Mourinho had. Scolary I think as well. Deco was his signing, at least. Jose really wanted Shevchenko. If Ancelotti hadn't wanted either, then he wouldn't have selected them, but he did play them both regularly. You can however see certain signings that some managers don't want...Keane and Benitez, and to a lesser extent AVB/Cahill. If Ancelotti wanted Torres for £50m, then he doesn't deserve to watch football nevermind manage a club. That transfer stinks of boardroom trying to go for a glory signing, 100% RA signing imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 He's been rubbish, man. Their big mistake was getting him in the first place. Not disagreeing. But if you make this sort of move as the Chelsea hierarchy, you must be doing it knowing that it may not necessarily be overnight success. When you've paid that sort of money to get him out of his contract at Porto, surely you're thinking long-term? Bananas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Do Chelsea's managers actually get a big say in who they sign? Mourinho had. Scolary I think as well. Deco was his signing, at least. Schevchenko disagrees. I have my doubts on Ballack too. Ballack was wanted. Just ask Gallas who suddenly got his Nr. 13 removed.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 *Paying £72m for them (Middle ground that apparently doesn't exist) *Never selecting them Come on then Columbo, explain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Do Chelsea's managers actually get a big say in who they sign? Mourinho had. Scolary I think as well. Deco was his signing, at least. Jose really wanted Shevchenko. If Ancelotti hadn't wanted either, then he wouldn't have selected them, but he did play them both regularly. You can however see certain signings that some managers don't want...Keane and Benitez, and to a lesser extent AVB/Cahill. If Ancelotti wanted Torres for £50m, then he doesn't deserve to watch football nevermind manage a club. That transfer stinks of boardroom trying to go for a glory signing, 100% RA signing imo. You know that for sure, do you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 and once again the egomanaic past it players get they're way. The likes of Drogba and Lampard espicially should be torn to shreds by the media over the way they've acted throughout this but will they? Golden boy Lamps? Nothings changed for Chelsea, Di Matteo will not make much of an impact and whomever gets the job for next season will face the exact same problem with past it players who ideally would be phased out but since their egos can't handle that they need to be thrown out of that club if Chelsea are to progress at a club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Do Chelsea's managers actually get a big say in who they sign? Mourinho had. Scolary I think as well. Deco was his signing, at least. Jose really wanted Shevchenko. If Ancelotti hadn't wanted either, then he wouldn't have selected them, but he did play them both regularly. You can however see certain signings that some managers don't want...Keane and Benitez, and to a lesser extent AVB/Cahill. If Ancelotti wanted Torres for £50m, then he doesn't deserve to watch football nevermind manage a club. That transfer stinks of boardroom trying to go for a glory signing, 100% RA signing imo. You know that for sure, do you? Yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Do Chelsea's managers actually get a big say in who they sign? Mourinho had. Scolary I think as well. Deco was his signing, at least. Jose really wanted Shevchenko. If Ancelotti hadn't wanted either, then he wouldn't have selected them, but he did play them both regularly. You can however see certain signings that some managers don't want...Keane and Benitez, and to a lesser extent AVB/Cahill. If Ancelotti wanted Torres for £50m, then he doesn't deserve to watch football nevermind manage a club. That transfer stinks of boardroom trying to go for a glory signing, 100% RA signing imo. You know that for sure, do you? Like I said IMO, no one is stating facts here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Based on the fact I dont think Pardew will get the best out of players, and that AVB plays positive football, get him in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 and once again the egomanaic past it players get they're way. The likes of Drogba and Lampard espicially should be torn to shreds by the media over the way they've acted throughout this but will they? Golden boy Lamps? Eh? What have Drogba and Lampard done wrong, apart from not playing particularly well? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 and once again the egomanaic past it players get they're way. The likes of Drogba and Lampard espicially should be torn to shreds by the media over the way they've acted throughout this but will they? Golden boy Lamps? Nothings changed for Chelsea, Di Matteo will not make much of an impact and whomever gets the job for next season will face the exact same problem with past it players who ideally would be phased out but since their egos can't handle that they need to be thrown out of that club if Chelsea are to progress at a club Nail. On. Head. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now