Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My fear is that we get rid of Carr and hand Pardew control of the transfers. Which would be the biggest mistake this club could ever possibly make.

 

I would say there's literally no chance whatsoever of that happening.

 

 

That does fascinate.

 

The thought of Pardew having full control of transfers, I would think we would actually be higher in the league than we are now.  In terms of style .. Well it would be no worse than the s*** he dishes out right now.

 

He would sign the right players for his route one bore fest .  Sort of mid table mediocrity at best but in a better place than where we are now.

 

But our player would be worth next to nothing in market value and the results would worsen over time as well because route one football isn't hard to counter act. Look at Stoke this season and West Ham gradually declining as the season has wore on.

 

Yes it would be damaging in the long run, but I was thinking perversely , we would probably be higher in the league than we are now if only by just a few places.  Strange but probrable.

 

Not that I would want him to be in control of transfers.  f*** me that gives me the shivers.

 

The man that preferred Mullins over mascherano, and harewood over tevez.

 

More on principle than anything else. Both players were signed above his head and he didnt like it. Keegan walked for the exact same thing.

 

The deals were also against the law.

 

Against the law? Lol

 

He basically cut his nose off to spite his own face the dumb cockney twat.

 

It was, third party ownership, worst ham had to pay Sheff utd something like £20m due to them being relegated in their place. (Tevez scored the winner against manu to keep them up irrc on the last day of the season)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My fear is that we get rid of Carr and hand Pardew control of the transfers. Which would be the biggest mistake this club could ever possibly make.

 

 

 

 

I would say there's literally no chance whatsoever of that happening.

 

 

That does fascinate.

 

The thought of Pardew having full control of transfers, I would think we would actually be higher in the league than we are now.  In terms of style .. Well it would be no worse than the s*** he dishes out right now.

 

He would sign the right players for his route one bore fest .  Sort of mid table mediocrity at best but in a better place than where we are now.

 

But our player would be worth next to nothing in market value and the results would worsen over time as well because route one football isn't hard to counter act. Look at Stoke this season and West Ham gradually declining as the season has wore on.

 

Yes it would be damaging in the long run, but I was thinking perversely , we would probably be higher in the league than we are now if only by just a few places.  Strange but probrable.

 

Not that I would want him to be in control of transfers.  f*** me that gives me the shivers.

 

The man that preferred Mullins over mascherano, and harewood over tevez.

 

More on principle than anything else. Both players were signed above his head and he didnt like it. Keegan walked for the exact same thing.

 

The deals were also against the law.

 

Against the law? Lol

 

He basically cut his nose off to spite his own face the dumb cockney t***.

 

It was, third party ownership, worst ham had to pay Sheff utd something like £20m due to them being relegated in their place. (Tevez scored the winner against manu to keep them up irrc on the last day of the season)

 

To be fair to Pardew, 3rd party ownership got f*** all to do with him.  Means to an end.  I know who got the better deal. Not Sheffield utd lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My fear is that we get rid of Carr and hand Pardew control of the transfers. Which would be the biggest mistake this club could ever possibly make.

 

 

 

 

I would say there's literally no chance whatsoever of that happening.

 

 

That does fascinate.

 

The thought of Pardew having full control of transfers, I would think we would actually be higher in the league than we are now.  In terms of style .. Well it would be no worse than the s*** he dishes out right now.

 

He would sign the right players for his route one bore fest .  Sort of mid table mediocrity at best but in a better place than where we are now.

 

But our player would be worth next to nothing in market value and the results would worsen over time as well because route one football isn't hard to counter act. Look at Stoke this season and West Ham gradually declining as the season has wore on.

 

Yes it would be damaging in the long run, but I was thinking perversely , we would probably be higher in the league than we are now if only by just a few places.  Strange but probrable.

 

Not that I would want him to be in control of transfers.  f*** me that gives me the shivers.

 

The man that preferred Mullins over mascherano, and harewood over tevez.

 

More on principle than anything else. Both players were signed above his head and he didnt like it. Keegan walked for the exact same thing.

 

The deals were also against the law.

 

Against the law? Lol

 

He basically cut his nose off to spite his own face the dumb cockney t***.

 

It was, third party ownership, worst ham had to pay Sheff utd something like £20m due to them being relegated in their place. (Tevez scored the winner against manu to keep them up irrc on the last day of the season)

 

To be fair to Pardew, 3rd party ownership got fuck all to do with him.  Means to an end.  I know who got the better deal.

 

Aye, tevez, masch and their agent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My fear is that we get rid of Carr and hand Pardew control of the transfers. Which would be the biggest mistake this club could ever possibly make.

 

 

 

 

I would say there's literally no chance whatsoever of that happening.

 

 

That does fascinate.

 

The thought of Pardew having full control of transfers, I would think we would actually be higher in the league than we are now.  In terms of style .. Well it would be no worse than the s*** he dishes out right now.

 

He would sign the right players for his route one bore fest .  Sort of mid table mediocrity at best but in a better place than where we are now.

 

But our player would be worth next to nothing in market value and the results would worsen over time as well because route one football isn't hard to counter act. Look at Stoke this season and West Ham gradually declining as the season has wore on.

 

Yes it would be damaging in the long run, but I was thinking perversely , we would probably be higher in the league than we are now if only by just a few places.  Strange but probrable.

 

Not that I would want him to be in control of transfers.  f*** me that gives me the shivers.

 

The man that preferred Mullins over mascherano, and harewood over tevez.

 

More on principle than anything else. Both players were signed above his head and he didnt like it. Keegan walked for the exact same thing.

 

The deals were also against the law.

 

Against the law? Lol

 

He basically cut his nose off to spite his own face the dumb cockney t***.

 

It was, third party ownership, worst ham had to pay Sheff utd something like £20m due to them being relegated in their place. (Tevez scored the winner against manu to keep them up irrc on the last day of the season)

 

To be fair to Pardew, 3rd party ownership got f*** all to do with him.  Means to an end.  I know who got the better deal.

 

Aye, tevez, masch and their agent.

 

And west ham, including the fine, money well spent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...