Hanshithispantz Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 And no, we don't need a Pulis Fucking hell man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 Fuck Moyes as well, while we're at it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 Sunderland constantly make s**** appointments man, Sam's just the next on the list. They're no better than us. They'll stay up imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 And no, we don't need a Pulis f***ing hell man. Who would you (realistically) go for then? And why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 And no, we don't need a Pulis f***ing hell man. Who would you (realistically) go for then? And why? Pulis isn't particularly realistic considering he's at a club tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 I think I'm past caring to be honest, the situation's completely toxic. Cracks were papered over for many years due to the manager's main interest in keeping his newly salvaged personal reputation intact. It's actually getting really boring now, veering from one awful losing streak to the next with no end in sight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 And no, we don't need a Pulis f***ing hell man. Who would you (realistically) go for then? And why? Pulis isn't particularly realistic considering he's at a club tbh. Hence 'a pulis'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 It's a loaded question, sick of people asking it in response to me saying I don't want a Tony Pulis or a Mark Hughes tbh. I want us to stop going in for shit journeymen managers and going through the same process of being told they need to be given time before we can sack them for being shite. Looking abroad would be a start. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 It's a loaded question, sick of people asking it in response to me saying I don't want a Tony Pulis or a Mark Hughes tbh. I want us to stop going in for s*** journeymen managers and going through the same process of being told they need to be given time before we can sack them for being s****. Looking abroad would be a start. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Imagine having the audacity to laugh at me after saying "we need a pulis" man you radge packet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 I reckon we should gan in for Tony Mowbray. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Imagine having the audacity to laugh at me after saying "we need a pulis" man you radge packet. I'm laughing at the mini rant, I tried to highlight that but it didn't work on my phone. So you know who you don't want, you just don't know who you do? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Imagine having the audacity to laugh at me after saying "we need a pulis" man you radge packet. By the way, I don't want a pulis type manager either, but we're so far f***ed I can't see another head coach type working, we're too f***ed for a Garde or mcclaren, who were their two main choices last time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 I'd sooner keep McClaren that get Redknapp like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 I'd sooner keep McClaren that get Redknapp like. Redknapp would be grim as fuck like, no doubt. His record of fixing toxic dressing rooms isn't the best either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Why is that such a difficult concept to understand? It's pointless naming managers I want as it's easily battered away by "they're out of reach." Something I genuinely don't believe is true, our perimeters are only defined by Ashley, we don;t have to accept that though. And there's not a chance I'm accepting that Tony Pulis is the best we can get like, fucking come on man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Why is that such a difficult concept to understand? It's pointless naming managers I want as it's easily battered away by "they're out of reach." Something I genuinely don't believe is true, our perimeters are only defined by Ashley, we don;t have to accept that though. And there's not a chance I'm accepting that Tony Pulis is the best we can get like, f***ing come on man. Nobody said he was btw (the best we can get). The limits are there while Ashley is there. We couldn't get an Eddie howe under Ashley man, let alone a European big name. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 I'd sooner keep McClaren that get Redknapp like. Redknapp would be grim as fuck like, no doubt. His record of fixing toxic dressing rooms isn't the best either. He's done, would be another yesterday's man. Not even going to get started on his personality. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Why is that such a difficult concept to understand? It's pointless naming managers I want as it's easily battered away by "they're out of reach." Something I genuinely don't believe is true, our perimeters are only defined by Ashley, we don;t have to accept that though. And there's not a chance I'm accepting that Tony Pulis is the best we can get like, f***ing come on man. It's also not a difficult concept to understand, I asked a question, obviously the answer is yes, and thats fine. Presumptuous fecker aren't you! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 "We couldn't get an Eddie howe under Ashley man, let alone a European big name" It doesn't matter though, that's my point. Whoever we get I'll not accept it unless they're good enough, I don't know why anyone would. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Went for Ketsbaia and Jemez as I think they'd be realistic options for us and i'd love to see either of them at the club. I think Viera or Seedorf could be what we need as well like. Imagine the players reaction when Patrick Viera walks into the dressing room and starts talking, instant respect. Same goes for Seedorf really. Keegan would be lovely as well but I reckon that'll happen around the same time Charnleys hair grows back and Ashley wins philanthropist of the year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 For me the answer is always Bielsa but more realistically I'd say Galtier or Ketsbaia. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanSkÃrare Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 It's not so much about who we could get or who would actually want the job, but rather who fits Ashley's idea of a manager. It'd be someone to do his bidding and someone who's forever indebted to him for lending him the chance. Like Pardew and McClaren. The manager is key to his construction, but will always expose him for what he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 It's not so much about who we could get or who would actually want the job, but rather who fits Ashley's idea of a manager. It'd be someone to do his bidding and someone who's forever indebted to him for lending him the chance. Like Pardew and McClaren. The manager is key to his construction, but will always expose him for what he is. The thread title is "Who would you go for?"... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samag Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 It will makes no difference who we get. Until we get players who are good enough we will always struggle. Until the manager has control of who we sign no half decent manager will come near this place and the quality of players we sign will not improve either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now