Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just an observation, but Seems like a generation of Dutch players are ALL getting into management and/or coaching of some kind (Cocu, De Boer bros, Bergkamp, Kluivert, RVN etc) But generally the same generation of say English players are not - they get into media.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did he manage him at Liverpool?

 

I don't think you can describe what he did at Liverpool as "managing".

 

He had a habit of picking random Liverpool players for England that he'd managed (Martin Kelly springs to mind) so I thought that might be in his reasoning

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone do a Best XI of recently active managers? So for example you could have  players such as Seedorf, Guardiola, Laudrup, Blanc, van Basten in there because they've recently managed at clubs. Preferably an XI without Maradona as that makes it a bit boring

 

Current manager and half decent player in their time XI

 

Preud'homme (Brugge)

Karanka (Boro) - de Boer (Ajax) - Mihajlović (Samp)

Enrique (Barça) - Deschamps (France) - Simeone (Atleti) - Cocu (PSV)

Mancini (Inter)

Palermo (Arsenal de Sarandi) - Klinsmann (USA)

 

Bench of: Zola, Bruce, Strachan, Montella and Montanier

 

In mildly related news Doriva, the old Boro gadgy is Vasco da Gama manager these days.

 

Excellent effort :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did he manage him at Liverpool?

 

I don't think you can describe what he did at Liverpool as "managing".

 

He had a habit of picking random Liverpool players for England that he'd managed (Martin Kelly springs to mind) so I thought that might be in his reasoning

 

You give him too much credit, methinks.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

outcry on motd's Facebook page coz that Stephanie Roche never got best goal award.

 

'if messi or ronaldo did that'

James's goal was the best like. Personally I think the best two we're that and Cahill's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone do a Best XI of recently active managers? So for example you could have  players such as Seedorf, Guardiola, Laudrup, Blanc, van Basten in there because they've recently managed at clubs. Preferably an XI without Maradona as that makes it a bit boring

 

Current manager and half decent player in their time XI

 

Preud'homme (Brugge)

Karanka (Boro) - de Boer (Ajax) - Mihajlović (Samp)

Enrique (Barça) - Deschamps (France) - Simeone (Atleti) - Cocu (PSV)

Mancini (Inter)

Palermo (Arsenal de Sarandi) - Klinsmann (USA)

 

Bench of: Zola, Bruce, Strachan, Montella and Montanier

 

In mildly related news Doriva, the old Boro gadgy is Vasco da Gama manager these days.

 

Excellent effort :thup:

 

I would definitely have Blanc over at least Bruce on the bench, but that's pretty awesome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an observation, but Seems like a generation of Dutch players are ALL getting into management and/or coaching of some kind (Cocu, De Boer bros, Bergkamp, Kluivert, RVN etc) But generally the same generation of say English players are not - they get into media.

 

They probably look at the likes of Paul Merson and think "If he can earn a living doing that, anyone can..."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Punditry is a safe game for them. Guaranteed job pretty much once you've got your feet under the table, no pressure, no having to go down the leagues etc.

 

I guess the money Sky/BT/BBC etc offers ex pros hammers what other countries offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We do have a few ex-pros serving as pundits, too, but not in the staggering amounts you do. We still have mostly professional "journalists" doing most stuff.

 

Not that the average Spanish football journo is going to win the Pullitzer anytime soon, mind. The best journalist that writes about Spanish football is a brit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Punditry is a safe game for them. Guaranteed job pretty much once you've got your feet under the table, no pressure, no having to go down the leagues etc.

 

I guess the money Sky/BT/BBC etc offers ex pros hammers what other countries offer.

 

Less pressure, just as much (or more) pay, less work each week, etc. You see a lot of the more successful NFL coaches going into TV more too, can't blame them it's a much more sensible decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We do have a few ex-pros serving as pundits, too, but not in the staggering amounts you do. We still have mostly professional "journalists" doing most stuff.

 

Not that the average Spanish football journo is going to win the Pullitzer anytime soon, mind. The best journalist that writes about Spanish football is a brit.

 

Speaking of which, I'm reading Lowe's weekly La Liga article (great read if you're interested in our OMGWEMIGHTFINISHTHIRD-crisis), and found this great bit:

 

http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/jan/12/lionel-messi-barcelona-unite-crisis-for-now

 

“The whore that gave birth to you,” he shouted. Which, dramatic and bizarre though it sounds is a pretty common and relatively harmless phrase in Spanish.

 

Sadly true :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

“The whore that gave birth to you,” he shouted. Which, dramatic and bizarre though it sounds is a pretty common and relatively harmless phrase in Spanish.

 

Sadly true :lol:

 

:lol:

 

Was trying to explain to my friends that it's really not that bad, and usually not really aimed at the person in that kind of way. I use it quite a lot whenever I rage :lol: But it's never really aimed to offend anyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Liverpool fan friend of mine just told me that "Newcastle were one of the richest clubs in England the 90s", in the middle of a "money doesn't buy success" tirade. Is that true? I know you were actually one of the top clubs in England (money-wise) in the 2000s, but not too sure before that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...