Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

Still Not Worthy Of A Thread

joeyt

by joeyt
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Tiresias

Tiresias

Posted
Posted

http://www.theguardian.com/media/blog/2013/nov/01/sky-bt-sport-rupert-murdoch

 

It was the 30-year anniversary last week of Sky TV's first UK satellite broadcast, a date that somehow passed largely unmarked, no doubt due in part to a widespread perception of Rupert Murdoch and his corporation as some sort of low-browed, profiteering, amoral, sociopathic corporate mega-parasite. This does seem a little graceless in the circumstances. Fair is only fair and sometimes you just have to take your hat off all the same. With this in mind this page may as well be the first to say it out loud. Happy low-browed, profiteering, amoral, sociopathic corporate mega-parasite 30th anniversary!

 

Obviously, that's just a little joke – and not just for legal reasons either as the fact is, like so many popular bogeymen, not least those of the quaveringly aghast political left, Murdoch himself is a more difficult figure to pin down. It might be convenient to dismiss the most significant living Australian as a kind of sulphurous aberration, but the fact is his achievements are both intricately wrought and, when it comes to English football, pretty much undo-able. He remains the founding father of the new world, those satellite dishes that first began appearing like a fungal infection across tower blocks and suburban streets 30 years ago resembling now the open pores, the great yawning liver spots of the impermeable Murdoch-skin stretched across every street, every piece of footballing infrastructure, enclosing an entire sporting industry within an airtight Murdoch membrane.

 

The reason for mentioning this now is not so much the missed anniversary as its coincidence with the first set of financial results for BT Sport, Sky's latest competitor and the first to actively market itself as a chattier, nicer, less frighteningly jackbooted alternative. This is no doubt a smart move on BT's part, who have been promoted as a kind of rebel alliance to Sky's imperial death star, a pop-up farmer's market of a TV channel headed up by Jake Humphrey and his magical striding world of sport.

 

It is a smart piece of timing, helped in recent weeks by the fact Sky seems to have gone slightly mad in some areas of its programming, not so much broadcasting live football on Monday nights as staging a forensic re-enactment of the Kennedy assassination. Jamie Carragher in particular – while obviously very good and very bright – still seems painfully intense on screen, like a man being publicly talked down from a rooftop siege, writhing and sweating and blurting out his grievances, while Gary Neville smiles and nods and edges closer, one hand on his taser.

 

Next to this BT Sport does seem lighter, more conversational, more agreeably Ewok-ish. Yet according to the latest figures it is already struggling, ratings for its live Premier League football worse than those for all the been-and-gone pretenders, worse even than Setanta, with its faded green and yellows, its wobbling sets, its sad-eyed presenters with broken smiles. No doubt this is in part to do with simply growing the business, not to mention poor scheduling, with BT basing its week around the graveyard-shift Saturday lunchtime Premier League game. It is, though, part of a wider narrative.

 

We have, let's face it, been here before. My first job in journalism was on the website of the unlamented ITV Sport Channel, launched on the outer edge of the first internet boom, a time of start-ups and land-grabs, of brave, clueless internet frontiersmen decisively skewering the digital future three times every morning before breakfast.

 

At ITV the big earth-changing gimmick was live, typed text commentary scrolling in a box next to the game. Quite why anybody ever thought this was a brilliant idea still isn't clear, but this is often the way of these things: someone important but clueless has a Big Idea, in this case an idea that saw us towards the end diligently typing live text commentary on matches that were watched, technically, by zero human beings, by no people, an audience so negligible it was in fact indivisible (after a while we got into a habit of simply typing in word for word whatever David Pleat said on co-commentary – "They need to get tighter on the wide players" "West Brom all bunched up in the centre" "The game opening up now").

 

ITV Sport Channel failed for the same reason all these sub-Sky ventures fail, because they are, in effect, simply a pastry frill around the edge of a pie that has already been divvied up. And this is really the point about all this. The appearance of BT Sport – which is in fact not a magical sporting farmer's market, but a gambit in the tactical repositioning of a communications giant – is further evidence of the degree to which English football has turned itself inside out for television. It is now almost entirely a televisual business, success defined not by cups or crowds but by simply remaining on Premier League television for another year. Having an interest in football or supporting a team has become a kind of consumer weakness to be exploited, the equivalent of accidentally smiling at a salesman in a shopping mall and finding yourself slammed up against the window of JD Sports by some hair-gelled predator with a clipboard.

 

It is hard not to wish BT Sport well, if only for the degree of energy expended in its conception. But it is hard also to avoid the feeling Sky Sports welcomes these intrusions, offering as they do the illusion of competition, while also enlarging the TV rights pot and thereby improving the basic product. A flex of the elbow was all it took to stop BT acquiring anything like a dangerous stake. Share prices are up. Audiences are up. And, in the end, all of this simply emphasises the scale of Sky's achievement. It is worth restating in anniversary week, but what has happened here is a very British kind of carve-up, a daring, bloody and irreversible industry transformation by a single interventionist provider.

 

Thirty years on from that first broadcast, and 22 years on from the moment the competition was decisively blown out of the water, we are all still looking out through Rupert's eyes.

 

Think Barney Ronay is one of the best sports writers around imo

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tiresias

Tiresias

Posted
Posted

iplayering 606, fulham fan desperate for Jol to be sacked (fair enough) before houghton so they can win the chase for martin o'neil  :lol: :lol:

 

Now a cringeworthy geordie praising jonas shola and pardew as if they're brilliant  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Optimistic Nut

Optimistic Nut

Posted
Posted

Just a random thought that made me think, 'fuck I'm getting old' a bit. I'd always thought the 1966 World Cup was like ancient history when I was a kid. The 1990 World Cup was my first proper football memory....yet that World Cup was the midpoint between 66 and the one coming up. :undecided:

Link to post
Share on other sites
jdckelly

jdckelly

Posted
Posted

iplayering 606, fulham fan desperate for Jol to be sacked (fair enough) before houghton so they can win the chase for martin o'neil  :lol: :lol:

pity for him Ireland won the race pretty much already......................they can have Keane though!

Link to post
Share on other sites
JH

JH

Posted
Posted

Just a random thought that made me think, 'f*** I'm getting old' a bit. I'd always thought the 1966 World Cup was like ancient history when I was a kid. The 1990 World Cup was my first proper football memory....yet that World Cup was the midpoint between 66 and the one coming up. :undecided:

 

Just to make you feel really old, I was 4 months old when the 1990 World Cup kicked off :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
jdckelly

jdckelly

Posted
Posted

out of idle curiosity and boredom decided to compare results between this season and last season in the equivilant fixtures (replacing the relegated sides with promoted ones in order of champ table) obviously far from perfect and a lot of other factors but could be a nice simplified way of keeping track of then vs now (would have tried to pull same thing off for 5th place season but it just gets complicated with relegation etc).

 

Thus far in the equivalent fixtures we're 3 points up and 8 goals better off in goal difference (mostly due to the 2-2 draw with liverpool compared to 6-0 loss)

 

City away-same result

West Ham (h)-1pt better off +1gd

Fulhan (h)- same result

Villa (a)- same result

Hull (compared to Reading) (h) -result and impact on GD the same

Everton (a) -1pt -1GD

Cardiff (compared to Wigan) (a)- +3pts +2GD

Liverpool (h)- +1pt +6 GD

Sunderland (a) -1pt -1gd

Chelsea (h)- same pts +1 GD

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...