Guest neesy111 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 The expectations from the club in their own statement announcing the sacking was to survive relegation, they are just about managing that at present - don't see what he's done wrong personally. If anyone deserves any sort of chance to finish the season, it's him. 0 league goals in 2017 is not managing it, everyone below them is showing something while their form is as bad as it gets. Aye, they are even worse than sunderland by a good distance at the moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisJbarnes Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Puts things into perspective when we get criticised for wanting Pardew out several seasons later when he got us to 5th "Deluded Geordies" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 The expectations from the club in their own statement announcing the sacking was to survive relegation, they are just about managing that at present - don't see what he's done wrong personally. If anyone deserves any sort of chance to finish the season, it's him. 0 league goals in 2017 is not managing it, everyone below them is showing something while their form is as bad as it gets. Aye, they are even worse than sunderland by a good distance at the moment. They've played only two home league games in 2017 which were against the two most in-form sides in the league (Chelsea and Man Utd). They'll score goals and win games at home which will keep them up (similar to Burnley). If anyone around the bottom went through a phase of 4 away matches & 2 home games against two of the best sides in the league, they'd be out of form too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Puts things into perspective when we get criticised for wanting Pardew out several seasons later when he got us to 5th "Deluded Geordies" I basically never agree with sackings at other clubs after that. I want them all to fucking suffer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 The expectations from the club in their own statement announcing the sacking was to survive relegation, they are just about managing that at present - don't see what he's done wrong personally. If anyone deserves any sort of chance to finish the season, it's him. 0 league goals in 2017 is not managing it, everyone below them is showing something while their form is as bad as it gets. Aye, they are even worse than sunderland by a good distance at the moment. They've played only two home league games in 2017 which were against the two most in-form sides in the league (Chelsea and Man Utd). They'll score goals and win games at home which will keep them up (similar to Burnley). If anyone around the bottom went through a phase of 4 away matches & 2 home games against two of the best sides in the league, they'd be out of form too. Like Hull have...... Also they got tortured in a 6 pointer vs Swansea in their last league game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jollof rice and pea Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Will defo be a random old big name shithouse, Trappatoni, Juande Ramos etc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 The expectations from the club in their own statement announcing the sacking was to survive relegation, they are just about managing that at present - don't see what he's done wrong personally. If anyone deserves any sort of chance to finish the season, it's him. 0 league goals in 2017 is not managing it, everyone below them is showing something while their form is as bad as it gets. Aye, they are even worse than sunderland by a good distance at the moment. They've played only two home league games in 2017 which were against the two most in-form sides in the league (Chelsea and Man Utd). They'll score goals and win games at home which will keep them up (similar to Burnley). If anyone around the bottom went through a phase of 4 away matches & 2 home games against two of the best sides in the league, they'd be out of form too. Like Hull have...... Hul's run of decent form started with a home game against Bournemouth, something I've just pointed out Leicester haven't had - an easy(ish) game at home. As I said earlier, which you cant comprehend. Their home form will keep them up, they have a good run of home games coming up before the end of the season that would have kept them up comfortably with Ranieri in charge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 The expectations from the club in their own statement announcing the sacking was to survive relegation, they are just about managing that at present - don't see what he's done wrong personally. If anyone deserves any sort of chance to finish the season, it's him. 0 league goals in 2017 is not managing it, everyone below them is showing something while their form is as bad as it gets. Aye, they are even worse than sunderland by a good distance at the moment. They've played only two home league games in 2017 which were against the two most in-form sides in the league (Chelsea and Man Utd). They'll score goals and win games at home which will keep them up (similar to Burnley). If anyone around the bottom went through a phase of 4 away matches & 2 home games against two of the best sides in the league, they'd be out of form too. Like Hull have...... Hul's run of decent form started with a home game against Bournemouth, something I've just pointed out Leicester haven't had - an easy(ish) game at home. As I said earlier, which you cant comprehend. Their home form will keep them up, they have a good run of home games coming up before the end of the season that would have kept them up comfortably with Ranieri in charge. I think it's debatable about that tbh, simply because of how bad they've looked in the league. They looked clueless both at the back and both upfront which is a terrible combination, though they did play better 2nd half yesterday. They've clearly got an appointment lined up as the timing is odd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Saw on twitter talking about Mourinho's sacking at chelsea after winning the league now this, obviously very different (Mou is kinda an overrated dick anyway) but both from player power out of control. When Wenger leaves pretty much every manager in the league can be sacked by their dressing room. Ludicrous and not going to lead to any great european success at least. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39071507?ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbc_match_of_the_day&ns_source=facebook&ns_linkname=sport Stay classy tim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
merlin Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 They could have went down and he'd have got them up straight away. Clough took Forest down and no one thinks any less of him. Completely different context and era though. ....and Clough in the dusk of his career after winning 2 European Cups for them - no comparison at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
merlin Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 A sign of the times....clubs are DESPERATE to stay in the PL and keep picking up the TV dosh..... We will be in just as much turmoil if we fail to go up this season - hopefully we won't have to find out if that is true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Did managers not used to get sacked when teams got relegated/were in danger of being relegated? You literally just do not survive these days. If you're in the bottom five for longer than a couple of weeks, chances are you're getting sacked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridman Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Queue a million Arsenal Fan TV videos being uploaded: "Leicester sacked Ranieri and he won them the facking LEAGUE, innit fam, blud, you get me, why can't we do that, why is everything ruined forever blud, I'm sick of it, Wenger Wenger blud fam Wenger deserve blud blud fam Wenger...." etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Will defo be a random old big name shithouse, Trappatoni, Juande Ramos etc Ranieri? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 If you support the sacking, then basically you are not in the camp of “you need a great manager to build up your club statue in long run aka the Ferguson works”. No fucking way. What Leicester should do is the opposite. Support the manager, flush out the rotten players after relegation, and let Ranieri to rebuild again. Afterwards no players would disrespect Ranieri and thats the real beginning of long term success. Does sacking Ranieri help to retain the players now? Obviously fucking no. If thats the case, rebuild is the only option then why not let the one with most credit to do it? This is a very short-sighted sacking. Exactly what we did to Sir Bobby and Leicester deserve to relegate and enter their dark era for this ridiculous decision. Relegation is not the worst outcome. Sinking without trace and direction is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 If you support the sacking, then basically you are not in the camp of “you need a great manager to build up your club statue in long run aka the Ferguson works”. No f***ing way. What Leicester should do is the opposite. Support the manager, flush out the rotten players after relegation, and let Ranieri to rebuild again. Afterwards no players would disrespect Ranieri and thats the real beginning of long term success. Does sacking Ranieri help to retain the players now? Obviously f***ing no. If thats the case, rebuild is the only option then why not let the one with most credit to do it? This is a very short-sighted sacking. Exactly what we did to Sir Bobby and Leicester deserve to relegate and enter their dark era for this ridiculous decision. Relegation is not the worst outcome. Sinking without trace and direction is. Depends if you think Ranieri is a great manager. Letting Sir Bob go wan't the problem, getting the right replacement was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 If you support the sacking, then basically you are not in the camp of “you need a great manager to build up your club statue in long run aka the Ferguson works”. No f***ing way. What Leicester should do is the opposite. Support the manager, flush out the rotten players after relegation, and let Ranieri to rebuild again. Afterwards no players would disrespect Ranieri and thats the real beginning of long term success. Does sacking Ranieri help to retain the players now? Obviously f***ing no. If thats the case, rebuild is the only option then why not let the one with most credit to do it? This is a very short-sighted sacking. Exactly what we did to Sir Bobby and Leicester deserve to relegate and enter their dark era for this ridiculous decision. Relegation is not the worst outcome. Sinking without trace and direction is. Depends if you think Ranieri is a great manager. Letting Sir Bob go wan't the problem, getting the right replacement was. The timing and manner of letting Bob go was the problem, and after that getting in the wrong replacement was a new problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 If you support the sacking, then basically you are not in the camp of “you need a great manager to build up your club statue in long run aka the Ferguson works”. No f***ing way. What Leicester should do is the opposite. Support the manager, flush out the rotten players after relegation, and let Ranieri to rebuild again. Afterwards no players would disrespect Ranieri and thats the real beginning of long term success. Does sacking Ranieri help to retain the players now? Obviously f***ing no. If thats the case, rebuild is the only option then why not let the one with most credit to do it? This is a very short-sighted sacking. Exactly what we did to Sir Bobby and Leicester deserve to relegate and enter their dark era for this ridiculous decision. Relegation is not the worst outcome. Sinking without trace and direction is. Depends if you think Ranieri is a great manager. Letting Sir Bob go wan't the problem, getting the right replacement was. The timing and manner of letting Bob go was the problem, and after that getting in the wrong replacement was a new problem. Definitely, for me Robson should have been edged out or up in that Summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Pardew to take over and win the Champions League, N-O shut down forever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Utter joke - he took a team of complete no-hopers to the title by TEN points and they bin him nine months later and they're in with a decent chance of reaching the last eight of the Champions League and he still has 1/3rd of the season to keep them where they are which is above the bottom three! A relegation three of this lot, Sunderland and Palace would be delicious especially if that dancing tosser gets this job! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyn davies Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 It doesn't matter what he did, it's where he's at now. Clearly the issue is with the players as a managers job depends on those on the pitch and if they want rid, they play poorly possibly deliberately. The same situation has even happened here in the past. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 It doesn't matter what he did, it's where he's at now. Clearly the issue is with the players as a managers job depends on those on the pitch and if they want rid, they play poorly possibly deliberately. The same situation has even happened here in the past. Thats exactly why the club should support the manager instead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 It doesn't matter what he did, it's where he's at now. Clearly the issue is with the players as a managers job depends on those on the pitch and if they want rid, they play poorly possibly deliberately. The same situation has even happened here in the past. Thats exactly why the club should support the manager instead. Cheaper to replace one guy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 The new guy is doing to have to buy a new back four anyway if they stay up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now