Jump to content

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Rich said:

Just looked like the 4-3-3 with Woltemade in the Joelinton role to me, mind.

With much more dynamism. We've had more midfielders getting beyond the forward and leaving their set line since the PSG game than we had the previous 2 yrs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I thought Woltemade looked closer to a 10 than an 8 against Villa, but he was much more obviously an out-and-out midfielder tonight. Had another really good game.

 

It's quite funny if the solution to him is literally just the same as Joelinton's, and he's just being fed through an identical reforging process. 

 

Heck of a move from Howe as well, if he's figured out that the way to get us going this season was, all along, to put Gordon up top. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Enjoyed Woltemade in the last couple of games but think he's too slow to be an 8 at a high level 

 

Fair enough as a 10, but the problem is that we always play a 4-5-1 out of possession, so he'd have to perform midfield duties / cover the left hand side 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don’t pay £60m+ for neat and tidy sideways-passing midfielders when you’re already overloaded in the midfield department.  
 

Just now, andyc35i said:

Maybe we were always looking for him to play behind Isak in this type of role he’s been doing recently. In the same way we tried hard to get Joao Pedro

We’d already sold Isak when we signed him, so probably not

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pissed away two decent home points in the last two home games trying to win games by playing too high up the pitch and aggressively in games where we have not played well. I appreciate the mentality to a degree but when we equalise we need to be stabilising the games and thinking how we can build again, not going for a winner suicidally. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Ronson333 said:

 


I’d hazard a guess this is a huge factor. The mental as well as physical fatigue of playing so many games. We don’t have the squad for it. Or the mindset tbh.


I also think our most successful style is when we’re just outrunning teams. That’s always going to be incredibly hard to do for 55-60 games a season (if we get CL again). Even with a better squad, you can’t rotate everyone every other match. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We now play this organised way from home, but at home it’s regularly a basketball match.. Eddie and the team this isn’t good enough, we need to be well drilled all the time 

 

 

Edited by Ronson333

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, if Howe stays then I think the chances of a ‘major rebuild’ are very slim. 
 

Eddie likes continuity and there’s very few players he will accept because the exacting physical demands he requires.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lotus said:

Also, if Howe stays then I think the chances of a ‘major rebuild’ are very slim. 
 

Eddie likes continuity and there’s very few players he will accept because the exacting physical demands he requires.

A lot of those players are at the end of the cycle or will ask out we likely need a 

GK

GK back up

CB

LB back up

RB first team

RB back up

CM Tonali replacement

CM Willock replacement

RW

LW Gordon replacement

ST

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, stozo said:

Pissed away two decent home points in the last two home games trying to win games by playing too high up the pitch and aggressively in games where we have not played well. I appreciate the mentality to a degree but when we equalise we need to be stabilising the games and thinking how we can build again, not going for a winner suicidally. 

Just rewatched the match and feel this even more strongly now. Somehow both the full backs are more advanced than Gordon when he loses the ball. Obviously frustrating for Gordon to lose the ball but it's literally a 4x4 as soon as the ball is turned over, which is just asking for trouble. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TRC said:

A lot of those players are at the end of the cycle or will ask out we likely need a 

GK

GK back up

CB

LB back up

RB first team

RB back up

CM Tonali replacement

CM Willock replacement

RW

LW Gordon replacement

ST

 


Do you honestly believe we’re going to sign 11 players in the summer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As many have said, this summer is absolutely critical to get right. I don't want to hear any monitoring, considering, evaluating, tracking, shortlisting, pondering, or weighing up a bid. Just bloody do it quick or move on to the next target. 

 

Without too much exaggeration I think, the following might need to be done:

 

GK (Pope replacement) 

GK (Ramsdale replacement) 

GK (Ruddy replacement) 

RB (Trippier replacement) 

RB (Krafth replacement)

RB/LB (Livra replacement?)

LB 

CB (Schar replacement)

CM/DM (J7 upgrade?)

CM (Tonali replacement?) 

AM (creative talent, ideally someone who can take set pieces too) 

LW (Gordon replacement?) 

RW (young player to upgrade on Murphy) 

ST (Osula replacement) 

ST (if we manage to flog Wissa/Wolte) 

 

Just the 15 players then [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

GK - RB - CB - LB - AM - RW for a start 

 

I have zero confidence in Woltermade - Wissa and Osula - for me none have a future here - worst case Big Nick stays - the other two are surplus 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TRC said:

No, but is that what we likely need?


Im not even sure bringing that many players , even in if we could, would be a good idea. Too much turnover and upheaval.

 

2 or 3 starters. Or what look like starters but may need 6 months to bed into the system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Likely only sign 3 or 4 main players and have to try and get some younger, cheaper players from continent or blood some of our own before end of season.

 

We also can't be fucking about and need deals wrapped up before end of season not some stupid transfer summit, watch all these players and make bids far to late. We could have bought better fit for the team than Elanga, Woltemade and Wissa for less than the 160m we paid for those. Those 3 just haven't done anywhere near enough and aren't aggressive enough. Wilson used to cause havoc because he was a menace, Isak because his pace and movement and Gordon and Barnes are capable of that if have right players around them.

 

Need to dump Pope, Trippier and Murphy as a minimum and consider selling Willock/Joelinton as well. I love big Joe but we need to evolve the team. Core players like Hall, Thiaw, Tonali, Bruno, Miley, Gordon and Barnes need to stay and Ramsey as he will fit into a better team. The rest should have for sale signs attached. Those core players have the quality, although some consistency issues, the rest just aren't game changers in any way

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Lotus said:


Im not even sure bringing that many players , even in if we could, would be a good idea. Too much turnover and upheaval.

 

2 or 3 starters. Or what look like starters but may need 6 months to bed into the system.

4 starters - GK - CB - RW - CF - non negotiable 

 

2 full backs to provide cover and competition - there is no way I am relying on Trippier (Krafth)

 

Then an attacking mid and CF

 

Ruddy - Gillespie - Ramsdale - Trippier - Krafth - Schar - Willock - Osula - Wissa - Woltermade - all go

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...