leffe186 Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Archway Sheet Metal were a pain in the arse, but it's ultimately easier to deal with one firm rather than the stuff other clubs would have to deal with, and the East side had local pitches rather than, say, listed housing. A jerry can and a box of matches, wasn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Love this btw The big kop stand goes over where it used to be, so adding that is a nice little touch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Those black seats are class. Would love to see something like that done in SJP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Love this btw The big kop stand goes over where it used to be, so adding that is a nice little touch It's insane to me that the stand at one end of the new stadium extends over the centre spot, as the Park Lane stand essentially starts in the same place as the new kop. Edit: fucking got the wrong end - I'm getting old. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Away fans in that corner Lersh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Looks amazing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Looks ridiculous. Mind they've had to pay for it, £650m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Temporary stands at Kingston Park? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Proper jealous of that like, it looks incredible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 We'd just play at the Heed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie1892 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. i thought they had restricted it in some capacity Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. i thought they had restricted it in some capacity Only by the council as Wembley's license only allowed for so many events. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL. Only some of the games are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickthemagpie Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium Just revive Castle Leazes if it were to ever happen, Dolly Potter is long dead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL. Only some of the games are. Earlier in the season and last season they weren't. The deal to allow them to use it from December onwards restricted the capacity to 51K. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL. Only some of the games are. Earlier in the season and last season they weren't. The deal to allow them to use it from December onwards restricted the capacity to 51K. Wrong. http://www.soccer-blogger.com/2017/12/20/tottenham-hotspur-crowds-at-wembley-2017-2018-attendances-stats-premier-league-champions-league-cup/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL. Only some of the games are. Earlier in the season and last season they weren't. The deal to allow them to use it from December onwards restricted the capacity to 51K. Wrong. http://www.soccer-blogger.com/2017/12/20/tottenham-hotspur-crowds-at-wembley-2017-2018-attendances-stats-premier-league-champions-league-cup/ Fuck me Neesy, what's with the Donald Trump stuff? Did you read what he wrote? https://www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/news/tottenham-wembley-season-new-stadium-15400190 The deal to stay on restricted capacity. We're apparently trying to negotiate an increase for certain games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL. Only some of the games are. Earlier in the season and last season they weren't. The deal to allow them to use it from December onwards restricted the capacity to 51K. Wrong. http://www.soccer-blogger.com/2017/12/20/tottenham-hotspur-crowds-at-wembley-2017-2018-attendances-stats-premier-league-champions-league-cup/ f*** me Neesy, what's with the Donald Trump stuff? Did you read what he wrote? https://www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/news/tottenham-wembley-season-new-stadium-15400190 The deal to stay on restricted capacity. We're apparently trying to negotiate an increase for certain games. My bad, yes it is restricted going forward. But it was suggested by upjest it was restricted last season which it clearly wasn't for most games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP. I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position. The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us. This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was. The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL. Only some of the games are. Earlier in the season and last season they weren't. The deal to allow them to use it from December onwards restricted the capacity to 51K. Wrong. http://www.soccer-blogger.com/2017/12/20/tottenham-hotspur-crowds-at-wembley-2017-2018-attendances-stats-premier-league-champions-league-cup/ f*** me Neesy, what's with the Donald Trump stuff? Did you read what he wrote? https://www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/news/tottenham-wembley-season-new-stadium-15400190 The deal to stay on restricted capacity. We're apparently trying to negotiate an increase for certain games. My bad, yes it is restricted going forward. But it was suggested by upjest it was restricted last season which it clearly wasn't for most games. He says exactly the opposite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted December 20, 2018 Share Posted December 20, 2018 If we were to ever do the same ourselves we'd be best to relocate to Leazes Park or something because we're pretty restricted at SJP. We wouldnt have room for the Spurs stadium there for a start. Leazes wouldnt be too far to move to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted December 20, 2018 Share Posted December 20, 2018 The arena site is big but it might be that little but too far out of town Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now