Jump to content

Other clubs’ stadiums


Disco

Recommended Posts

Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP.

 

I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position.

 

The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium :lol:

 

You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us.

 

This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was.

The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL.

 

Only some of the games are.

Earlier in the season and last season they weren't.

The deal to allow them to use it from December onwards restricted the capacity to 51K.

 

Wrong.

 

http://www.soccer-blogger.com/2017/12/20/tottenham-hotspur-crowds-at-wembley-2017-2018-attendances-stats-premier-league-champions-league-cup/

 

f*** me Neesy, what's with the Donald Trump stuff? :lol: Did you read what he wrote?

 

https://www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/news/tottenham-wembley-season-new-stadium-15400190

 

The deal to stay on restricted capacity. We're apparently trying to negotiate an increase for certain games.

 

My bad, yes it is restricted going forward.  But it was suggested by upjest it was restricted last season which it clearly wasn't for most games.

I never said that. I said it was restricted going forward as part of the deal for them to continue using it into 2019.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP.

 

I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position.

 

The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium :lol:

 

You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us.

 

This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was.

The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL.

 

Only some of the games are.

Earlier in the season and last season they weren't.

The deal to allow them to use it from December onwards restricted the capacity to 51K.

 

Wrong.

 

http://www.soccer-blogger.com/2017/12/20/tottenham-hotspur-crowds-at-wembley-2017-2018-attendances-stats-premier-league-champions-league-cup/

 

f*** me Neesy, what's with the Donald Trump stuff? :lol: Did you read what he wrote?

 

https://www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/news/tottenham-wembley-season-new-stadium-15400190

 

The deal to stay on restricted capacity. We're apparently trying to negotiate an increase for certain games.

 

My bad, yes it is restricted going forward.  But it was suggested by upjest it was restricted last season which it clearly wasn't for most games.

I never said that. I said it was restricted going forward as part of the deal for them to continue using it into 2019.

 

The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL.

 

You didn't say going forward in this quote initially when in reply to the original question.

 

They only need it for 2 games in anycase in 2019.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP.

 

I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position.

 

The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium :lol:

 

You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us.

 

This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was.

The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL.

 

Only some of the games are.

Earlier in the season and last season they weren't.

The deal to allow them to use it from December onwards restricted the capacity to 51K.

 

Wrong.

 

http://www.soccer-blogger.com/2017/12/20/tottenham-hotspur-crowds-at-wembley-2017-2018-attendances-stats-premier-league-champions-league-cup/

 

f*** me Neesy, what's with the Donald Trump stuff? :lol: Did you read what he wrote?

 

https://www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/news/tottenham-wembley-season-new-stadium-15400190

 

The deal to stay on restricted capacity. We're apparently trying to negotiate an increase for certain games.

 

My bad, yes it is restricted going forward.  But it was suggested by upjest it was restricted last season which it clearly wasn't for most games.

I never said that. I said it was restricted going forward as part of the deal for them to continue using it into 2019.

 

The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL.

 

You didn't say going forward in this quote initially when in reply to the original question.

 

They only need it for 2 games in anycase in 2019.

I think it's quite clear that I meant it was restricted now, I never mentioned last season or earlier in the season.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Have to say like, if we ever got an owner rich enough to build us something like that, I’d gladly leave SJP.

 

I'm sure we could knock it down a rebuild on the same spot to keep that enviable city center position.

 

The thing is where do we relocate for a few years while it is built - I'm sure Sunderland would be happy to share their stadium :lol:

 

You know for a fact the FA would force us to play our home games at the training ground. No special treatment for us.

 

This is what I hate about the Wembley thing. Crowds should be limited to what the maximum capacity of WHL was.

The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL.

 

Only some of the games are.

Earlier in the season and last season they weren't.

The deal to allow them to use it from December onwards restricted the capacity to 51K.

 

Wrong.

 

http://www.soccer-blogger.com/2017/12/20/tottenham-hotspur-crowds-at-wembley-2017-2018-attendances-stats-premier-league-champions-league-cup/

 

f*** me Neesy, what's with the Donald Trump stuff? :lol: Did you read what he wrote?

 

https://www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/news/tottenham-wembley-season-new-stadium-15400190

 

The deal to stay on restricted capacity. We're apparently trying to negotiate an increase for certain games.

 

My bad, yes it is restricted going forward.  But it was suggested by upjest it was restricted last season which it clearly wasn't for most games.

I never said that. I said it was restricted going forward as part of the deal for them to continue using it into 2019.

 

The capacity is restricted to 51K which is less than the capacity of the new WHL.

 

You didn't say going forward in this quote initially when in reply to the original question.

 

They only need it for 2 games in anycase in 2019.

I think it's quite clear that I meant it was restricted now, I never mentioned last season or earlier in the season.

 

Well sbnufc didn't as well judging by his post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everton Football Club has announced it is proposing a capacity of 52,000 for its new stadium, with the potential for this to rise to 62,000 in the future.

 

The proposed capacity and design of the new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock will be subject to further public consultation and engagement with supporters during the design process, and with other important stakeholders, including Liverpool City Council and Historic England.

 

The projected capacity takes into account several factors which include design and orientation of the stadium on a dock site, current and future ticket demand and forecast revenues and costs. The stadium will also be ‘futureproofed’ for any changes in regulations in relation to ‘safe standing’. The design of two of the stands will make it easy to adopt a rail seating/safe standing solution, which will offer optionality and flexibility, should the law change in future.

 

The proposed figure follows extensive engagement with fans and consultation with a range of professional advisors who have expertise in stadium design and defining the optimum capacity for new stadia.

 

A widespread public consultation was held into the Club’s plans for Bramley-Moore Dock, which is part of Peel Land and Property’s Liverpool Waters site, and the creation of a community-led legacy at Goodison Park, during which questions on the capacity of the new stadium were among the most frequently asked.

 

A second public consultation will be held in the summer when proposed designs of the stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock and an initial overview of proposals for Goodison Park will be presented.

 

The Club intends to submit a detailed planning application for the stadium in the second half of 2019 and, at the same time, an outline planning application for the redevelopment of Goodison Park.

 

Colin Chong, Stadium Development Director said: “There is still much work to do as we develop our plans and seek the views of our supporters and local communities as well as bodies such as Liverpool City Council, the Local Planning Authority and Historic England.

 

“At this stage, it is important to stress that this is our ‘proposed’ capacity and it is what we are currently working towards. It is important to emphasise that the final capacity and design will be subject to further engagement and consultation.

 

“We believe that our approach is the right one because it is commercially and financially sustainable and will mean that, in the long term, we will be able to increase the capacity should there be a demand and requirement to do so.

 

“Extensive work has gone into assessing the optimum capacity at the point of opening to create the best possible atmosphere for fans and, in turn, supporting the players on the pitch.

 

“At this stage it is not possible to say if and when any capacity expansion to an absolute maximum of 62,000 would take place. That would also be subject to further design work, fan and community consultation and planning approval.”

 

Stadium architect Dan Meis said: “We know from all of the conversations we’ve had with fans that they want a stadium that is atmospheric, feels like a fortress and supports the players on the pitch. They also want the Club to be ambitious for the future.

 

“We believe this proposed approach to design and capacity meets with those aspirations.

 

“Our design and engineering approach will give us the potential to expand in the future. This will be done if and when we are at a stage where it is financially viable and fits with our key principles.”

 

http://www.evertonfc.com/news/2018/12/20/stadium-capacity

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not too bothered about the capacity, more the upkeep. But it does highlight the gap. Clubs are building, and we can't even give ours a wash.

 

They've painted the level 7 stairs 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not too bothered about the capacity, more the upkeep. But it does highlight the gap. Clubs are building, and we can't even give ours a wash.

Bigger capacity means more day trippers. The current capacity is enough to satisfy demand from actual fans.

There's already plenty moaning about atmosphere, be even worse with a bigger influx of day trippers.

The atmosphere was actually far better when we had a 36K capacity bowl.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not too bothered about the capacity, more the upkeep. But it does highlight the gap. Clubs are building, and we can't even give ours a wash.

Bigger capacity means more day trippers. The current capacity is enough to satisfy demand from actual fans.

There's already plenty moaning about atmosphere, be even worse with a bigger influx of day trippers.

The atmosphere was actually far better when we had a 36K capacity bowl.

 

What about the thousands  of old school fans (like me), who refuse to give Ashley a penny and would come back under new ownership?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

When does it open?

Jan 30th v Watford

 

:thup: Will probably do Spurs away then.

 

edited :lol: and if Neesy is right, I wasn't far of with April. Something else will come up and they'll end up not even using it this season I bet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest covmag

Looks finished like  :lol:

 

Spurs fans must be foaming , top 3 team, Wembley as ya home, go getter chairman, top young players  :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...