Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RodneyCisse said:

Aye, you’ve got to be careful what you wish for with a box.

11/12 is class but has such good memories linked to it.

I like the 11/12 home to probs down to the season we had, but in reality that was a terrible jersey ? always surprising the love it gets 12 years on , because I'll never forget the outrage on here when that was leaked/released lol.... 

Remember when the 10/11 came out and i couldn't believe the quality or should I say lack of quality compared to the stuff adidas produced...

On to the new Jersey and that is a thing of beauty, will be buying it for me and the daughter not that she could give 2 shits right enough ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SEMTEX said:

 

Everything is photoshopped beyond belief in retail innit. But yeah they clearly decided to go a bit mental with it this time. It's pretty terrible. My guess is that nee1 arranged any proper photoshoot with players and they just went rogue.

I can't believe that image of Bruno controlling the ball is real. I thought it was a commercial tie in with the new EA Sports football game or something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, RodneyCisse said:

No pictures of the back?

 

Looks a little like one might have a white back (Darren Eales video holding it up) photoshopped kit looks to have stripes on back.

Close up shots show stripes on the back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First kit I'll be buying from the club since the golden northern rock one. Was tempted to buy one this season but ultimately very glad I waited until Fun88 was gone. Love the simple design with black & white logo. 

 

Any pictures of the back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, MrRaspberryJam said:

Zooming in, doesn't look like there's any stripes (or stripe) on the back (or at least on the top of the back). Could be like what we had in 10/11 where majority of it was plain white.  our first wirh puma iirc.

 

 

IMG_0057.jpeg

 

E96E07CF-8070-4FA1-92F0-6B97BD66A618.jpeg

70E4DEB6-5BE0-401E-88E4-862F9D2A064D.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, MrRaspberryJam said:

 

Listen. I'd rather you just said I was talking shit

Pictures were required due to the sheer level of shit where I just couldn’t be arsed to put it in words. 
 

but aye, black and white stripes on the back. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Geordie Boyo said:

Pictures were required due to the sheer level of shit where I just couldn’t be arsed to put it in words. 
 

but aye, black and white stripes on the back. 

 

I don't want to fall out over it or anything 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Geordie Boyo said:

 

E96E07CF-8070-4FA1-92F0-6B97BD66A618.jpeg

70E4DEB6-5BE0-401E-88E4-862F9D2A064D.jpeg

Don't like thoose light blue dots on the side.

 

Otherwise a really nice shirt!

 

On theese pictures it looks like it has stripes on the back.

Probably one homekit in PL and one without stripes on the back in CL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Toon No9 said:

Don't like thoose light blue dots on the side.

 

Otherwise a really nice shirt!

 

On theese pictures it looks like it has stripes on the back.

Probably one homekit in PL and one without stripes on the back in CL.


The dots are only on the pro shirt 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like the Noon patch either because the yellow stands out like a sore thumb on black and white and, as a colour, has no association at all with any other part of the kit. The red of that tyres one from 2017/18 was much less garish. 

 

848001734-newcastle-united-v-stoke-city-

 

Ultimately it would be better not to have a company logo there at all but this is where we are and I'm just grateful there's (presumably) a rule preventing manufacturers/clubs from going overboard and turning kits into the middle pages of Readers Digest. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

I don't like the Noon patch either because the yellow stands out like a sore thumb on black and white and, as a colour, has no association at all with any other part of the kit. The red of that tyres one from 2017/18 was much less garish. 

 

848001734-newcastle-united-v-stoke-city-

 

Ultimately it would be better not to have a company logo there at all but this is where we are and I'm just grateful there's (presumably) a rule preventing manufacturers/clubs from going overboard and turning kits into the middle pages of Readers Digest. 

 

There's an 80s-90s French kit for that. PSG 92/93 for instance. 

 

image.thumb.png.1ac5b0a8a4bcb7a28b602782c57b16e2.png

 

 

Edited by Optimistic Nut

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Geordie Boyo said:

26AA9215-65DD-43B3-91F5-26D428545121.jpeg

This is the only picture I've seen that I thought - Ok, that's alright.

 

Every other one looked AI generated or photoshopped, the black was blacker than the shirt, likewise the white - whiter than white. Made it look, what, unprofessional? As long as the black and white shades don't stand out from one another I'd say it's pretty cool.

 

Or maybe it was all just the lighting and you'd never notice on match day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

 

There's an 80s-90s French kit for that. PSG 92/93 for instance. 

 

image.thumb.png.1ac5b0a8a4bcb7a28b602782c57b16e2.png

 

 

 


In my mind Montpellier always have about 60 sponsors on their shirt. South America is pretty bad for it too.

 

 

Gonna be like playing at Old Trafford every game with those socks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...