Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Cool. Feels like you've picked up homework here, but interesting :lol:

 

 

In this instance specifically, indeed, I see no reason for a Brown Ale to get in the way as there is so little downside if any. Just wonder how and if they could given different circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a previous life I worked at toffs and they had an agreement to use a retro brown ale logo on a 1927 shirt, was especially popular in the USA.

 

just seen the 96/97 training gear in the background of some of the promo shots, hopefully they’ll be next off the the converter belt. The three t shirts in particular were class.

 

 

Edited by ramirez

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ramirez said:

In a previous life I worked at toffs and they had an agreement to use a retro brown ale logo on a 1927 shirt, was especially popular in the USA.

 

just seen the 96/97 training gear in the background of some of the promo shots, hopefully they’ll be next off the the converter belt. The three t shirts in particular were class.

 

 

 

Now that I’d consider getting 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 08/01/2025 at 20:29, gdm said:

https://x.com/amyalby2904/status/1876989684573716666?s=46

 

this lass seems to thing the collar & material is all wrong 

This is absolute bullshit to be honest. Just had a look at it in person - she's right about the namesets being vinyl but in no way is it "far inferior" to the original. The flock is not poor quality, the badge isn't yellowing (no idea what she's on about) and the collar details are exactly the same as the original, right down to the material which has the same weave pattern on it. It is not just a Score Draw remake with an adidas badge slapped on it - it is superior in every aspect to the Score Draw. If anything the only difference is the fit, and that the badge and the sponsor are actually better executed than the original. 

Don't know if her assessment is anything to do with the fact that she seems to work for Classic Football Shirts who charge at the absolute top end of the market for the original (as well as not disclosing aftermarket namesets on shirts)

 

 

Edited by Harry 209

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harry 209 said:

This is absolute bullshit to be honest. Just had a look at it in person - she's right about the namesets being vinyl but in no way is it "far inferior" to the original. The flock is not poor quality, the badge isn't yellowing (no idea what she's on about) and the collar details are exactly the same as the original, right down to the material which has the same weave pattern on it. It is not just a Score Draw remake with an adidas badge slapped on it - it is superior in every aspect to the Score Draw.. If anything the only difference is the fit, and that the badge and the sponsor are actually better executed than the original. 

Don't know if her assessment is anything to do with the fact that she seems to work for Classis Football Shirts who charge at the absolute top end of the market for the original (as well as not disclosing aftermarket namesets on shirts)

Final paragraph nails it 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ramirez said:

In a previous life I worked at toffs and they had an agreement to use a retro brown ale logo on a 1927 shirt, was especially popular in the USA.

 

just seen the 96/97 training gear in the background of some of the promo shots, hopefully they’ll be next off the the converter belt. The three t shirts in particular were class.

 

 

 


 

Hope not. My net worth shrinks by 75% if they do them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's much better in person like. 

 

Wouldn't say it's £90 worth (but what is these days), but it's definitely way above the snides.

 

Bring on the away kit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took a look at it in Fenwicks today. I have the original so can compare and basically the parts that can be considered a downgrade are the thinner material and the fit, even then it's down to personal taste. The rest of it looks fantastic and better quality. £90 is obviously a rip off, but it's not poor quality at all like, it looks and feels class.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kid Icarus said:

I took a look at it in Fenwicks today. I have the original so can compare and basically the parts that can be considered a downgrade are the thinner material and the fit, even then it's down to personal taste. The rest of it looks fantastic and better quality. £90 is obviously a rip off, but it's not poor quality at all like, it looks and feels class.

 

 

 

 

The crest looks extra crispy compared to original also, I like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mines just arrived. Slightly thinner/lightweight material. Probably a good thing as it’s clearly a more modern knit, however the waffle/stripe style remains. Everything else is bob on. The brown ale badge is super bright, but I think people remember when it was a bit faded after a few washes. Our crest is much better than the original though, again modern techniques I suppose. The rest is pretty much bang on. Obviously square box sizing aside. Sleeves are still OG long too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 05/01/2025 at 20:33, geordie_b said:


Print is fine, had this for over 20 years, was multiple versions of the nameset

IMG_1702.jpeg

When I originally had my home shirt printed in '95 I remember the nameset was dual layered (a white one applied on top of a black one) but I have a shirt that I bought more recently where the letters are just a single letter that's two colours  (see below). Did they do single layered letters back in 95-97 or are these aftermarket? The patina on them looks right to me, they don't look new.20250111_060941.thumb.jpg.68d9dfe80b59c37ec6091db8ffbb7aee.jpg

 

 

Edited by Harry 209

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said:

You an Admin? 

 

 

 

Just doing my bit for charity

 

Was the British Heart Foundation selling it on Ebay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@M4

 

The Heineken Marketing bod didn’t even know that Adidas were reissuing a shirt with the Brown Ale logo on 

 

But the view was that it’s free advertising for a beer brand that they spend zero money promoting, so no downside for Heineken 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bobbydazzla said:

@M4

 

The Heineken Marketing bod didn’t even know that Adidas were reissuing a shirt with the Brown Ale logo on 

 

But the view was that it’s free advertising for a beer brand that they spend zero money promoting, so no downside for Heineken 

Really think Brown Ale would sell better with more marketing to be honest.

Seems to become lesser and lesser known as time goes on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...