Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I never really got the big deal over this, FIFA have a very understandable policy designed to keep political fucknuttery out of football, and it's up to countries whether they obey the rule or take a fine. If it's really as important as so many think it is to wear the poppy then you take the fine and move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never really got the big deal over this, FIFA have a very understandable policy designed to keep political fucknuttery out of football, and it's up to countries whether they obey the rule or take a fine. If it's really as important as so many think it is to wear the poppy then you take the fine and move on.

 

We should pay the fine when FIFA settle up for the losses incurred by the FA as a result of the proven, industrial-scale corruption surrounding the 2018 and 2022 World Cup venue 'wins'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never really got the big deal over this, FIFA have a very understandable policy designed to keep political fucknuttery out of football, and it's up to countries whether they obey the rule or take a fine. If it's really as important as so many think it is to wear the poppy then you take the fine and move on.

 

We should pay the fine when FIFA settle up for the losses incurred by the FA as a result of the proven, industrial-scale corruption surrounding the 2018 and 2022 World Cup venue 'wins'.

 

By losses you mean the fancy handbags we bought for the delegates wives?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never really got the big deal over this, FIFA have a very understandable policy designed to keep political fucknuttery out of football, and it's up to countries whether they obey the rule or take a fine. If it's really as important as so many think it is to wear the poppy then you take the fine and move on.

 

We should pay the fine when FIFA settle up for the losses incurred by the FA as a result of the proven, industrial-scale corruption surrounding the 2018 and 2022 World Cup venue 'wins'.

 

By losses you mean the fancy handbags we bought for the delegates wives?

 

No, I mean the £14m total to prepare the bid that was fixed. It was the FA's refusal to pay proper bribes that meant we were never in the running.

 

The bags obviously didn't make much difference when FIFA wanted bribes in the tens of millions of dollars for their votes, so yes, we'll have the bags back, or their monetary equivalent, and send that and another large donation to the Earl Haig fund; and the remaining £13,900,000+ also, and decide what to do with that as and when.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never really got the big deal over this, FIFA have a very understandable policy designed to keep political fucknuttery out of football, and it's up to countries whether they obey the rule or take a fine. If it's really as important as so many think it is to wear the poppy then you take the fine and move on.

 

We should pay the fine when FIFA settle up for the losses incurred by the FA as a result of the proven, industrial-scale corruption surrounding the 2018 and 2022 World Cup venue 'wins'.

 

By losses you mean the fancy handbags we bought for the delegates wives?

Also the watch that we had to give back [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never really got the big deal over this, FIFA have a very understandable policy designed to keep political fucknuttery out of football, and it's up to countries whether they obey the rule or take a fine. If it's really as important as so many think it is to wear the poppy then you take the fine and move on.

 

We should pay the fine when FIFA settle up for the losses incurred by the FA as a result of the proven, industrial-scale corruption surrounding the 2018 and 2022 World Cup venue 'wins'.

 

By losses you mean the fancy handbags we bought for the delegates wives?

Also the watch that we had to give back [emoji38]

 

Not sure the watches Brazil - and delegates were ordered to return, in an attempt to convince people FIFA is not still uterly corrupt - gave out for WC 2014 are relevant here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never really got the big deal over this, FIFA have a very understandable policy designed to keep political fucknuttery out of football, and it's up to countries whether they obey the rule or take a fine. If it's really as important as so many think it is to wear the poppy then you take the fine and move on.

 

We should pay the fine when FIFA settle up for the losses incurred by the FA as a result of the proven, industrial-scale corruption surrounding the 2018 and 2022 World Cup venue 'wins'.

 

By losses you mean the fancy handbags we bought for the delegates wives?

Also the watch that we had to give back [emoji38]

 

Not sure the watches Brazil - and delegates were ordered to return, in an attempt to convince people FIFA is not still uterly corrupt - gave out for WC 2014 are relevant here.

Course they are can't attack Fifa for being corrupt when Greg took his watch and refused for ages to give it back. We are part of the problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a load of bollocks really. As much as I agree with anyone's right not to wear the poppy, and find the whole annual circus surrounding it tedious, I think if people want to wear it they also should be able to. I know anything can mean different things to different people, but the poppy as a political symbol is a world away from shitcunts like Argentina holding up banners in support of invading the Falklands before kick-off. The problem I'd imagine from FIFA's perspective is if you allow one, it's harder not to allow another and it would be a slippery slope. If we want the slightest chance of hosting a world cup in our lifetimes the best thing is to take the fine and not kick up a fuss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never really got the big deal over this, FIFA have a very understandable policy designed to keep political fucknuttery out of football, and it's up to countries whether they obey the rule or take a fine. If it's really as important as so many think it is to wear the poppy then you take the fine and move on.

problem for me anyway this time around is the precedent had already been set in 2011 (?) when they were allowed to wear armbands with it, so why is one instance okay and not the other?

As for Ireland and the Easter Rising thing I just find it funny that if that MP hadn't have pointed it FIFA would have never noticed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never really got the big deal over this, FIFA have a very understandable policy designed to keep political fucknuttery out of football, and it's up to countries whether they obey the rule or take a fine. If it's really as important as so many think it is to wear the poppy then you take the fine and move on.

problem for me anyway this time around is the precedent had already been set in 2011 (?) when they were allowed to wear armbands with it, so why is one instance okay and not the other?

As for Ireland and the Easter Rising thing I just find it funny that if that MP hadn't have pointed it FIFA would have never noticed.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/england/8879577/Fifa-backs-down-and-allow-England-players-to-wear-poppies-on-black-armband-against-Spain.html

After a day of extraordinary interventions, including both Prince William and Prime Minister David Cameron writing to Fifa asking that the players’ shirts be embroidered with poppies, world football’s governing body relented on its previously unshakeable stance.

 

Up until then Fifa had made clear, despite protestations from the FA, that it considered placing a poppy on a player’s shirt as contravening its rules banning political, religious and commercial messages.

 

It is understood that despite the high-level interventions - the Duke of Cambridge is also president of the FA and wrote in that capacity - it was a discussion between Conservative MP Chris Heaton-Harris and Fifa general secretary Jérôme Valcke that helped broker a deal.

 

Heaton-Harris is a relatively new MP, elected to the Daventry seat last year, and was previously a member of the European Parliament, where he struck up an acquaintance with Valcke, who has been handling the issue for Fifa.

 

Heaton-Harris was previously president of the Sports Intergroup, a group of 40 MEPs who have an interest in sport. It is believed it was his suggestion to allow the poppies on the armbands with Valcke then authorising the move.

 

Probably took a bung tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[emoji38] That's not how fines work.

 

In normal circumstances I agree but have been fined by one of the most corrupt organisations ever I think we have a right to know where the money is going

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Further ruining the World Cup from 2026 seems to be high on the agenda in the next couple of days. Quite a lot of journo's reporting they reckon it'll be 48 teams and potentially loads of penalty shootouts if games are draws.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...