Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You can't criticise some players on here without others bursting into tears.  for example - Wij and Ayoze were two of the most poor and anonymous players against Palace which was rarely mentioned. Cisse was one player to actually do something good in that game. 

 

I'm no fan of Cisse, he's a limited footballer and I don't think he can be a focal point for a good team. He can't get involved and work with others in build up. I can see Mitro being a part of a really slick attacking outfit.  However, even with Mitro we still suck going forward and struggle to score goals.  Mitro rarely looks like scoring.  His movement in the box isn't great and he's often. On his heels.  Cisse is the more likely to score imo. We need to keep it tight and have a few players that can knick us goals and Cisse's that player for us.  Only for the short or medium term would I play Cisse like.

 

At this stage a strike force of Ayoze and Mitro won't get us enough goals. Would like to see both in the team sooner rather than later though. 

 

The persecution complex is strong in this one.

 

Buddy, Ayoze was the least of our problems against Palace and Leicester when our entire fucking midfield was non existent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can handle Mitrovic's gamesmanship tbh. It's nothing to be proud of, and it's the kind of thing I'd be spitting feathers about if it went against us (back when I cared, anyway). But it's gamesmanship - part of the game and part of any other game. As others have said, I don't mind having a twat on the team as long as he's not absolutely taking the piss with diving like Ashley Young, or something, which is just blatant cheating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't criticise some players on here without others bursting into tears.  for example - Wij and Ayoze were two of the most poor and anonymous players against Palace which was rarely mentioned. Cisse was one player to actually do something good in that game. 

 

I'm no fan of Cisse, he's a limited footballer and I don't think he can be a focal point for a good team. He can't get involved and work with others in build up. I can see Mitro being a part of a really slick attacking outfit.  However, even with Mitro we still suck going forward and struggle to score goals.  Mitro rarely looks like scoring.  His movement in the box isn't great and he's often. On his heels.  Cisse is the more likely to score imo. We need to keep it tight and have a few players that can knick us goals and Cisse's that player for us.  Only for the short or medium term would I play Cisse like.

 

At this stage a strike force of Ayoze and Mitro won't get us enough goals. Would like to see both in the team sooner rather than later though. 

 

The persecution complex is strong in this one.

 

Buddy, Ayoze was the least of our problems against Palace and Leicester when our entire f***ing midfield was non existent.

Bearing in mind Ayoze plays behind rather than alongside the striker, should he not shoulder some of the blame for our abysmal midfield given that it's his job to help out to an extent? By contrast, De Jong more or less played the same role at the weekend and made a decent contribution towards possession, pressing, winning the ball back and the like. I'm a huge fan of Ayoze for the record but I think it's very generous to call him the least of our problems recently - he's been poor the last couple of games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't criticise some players on here without others bursting into tears.  for example - Wij and Ayoze were two of the most poor and anonymous players against Palace which was rarely mentioned. Cisse was one player to actually do something good in that game. 

 

I'm no fan of Cisse, he's a limited footballer and I don't think he can be a focal point for a good team. He can't get involved and work with others in build up. I can see Mitro being a part of a really slick attacking outfit.  However, even with Mitro we still suck going forward and struggle to score goals.  Mitro rarely looks like scoring.  His movement in the box isn't great and he's often. On his heels.  Cisse is the more likely to score imo. We need to keep it tight and have a few players that can knick us goals and Cisse's that player for us.  Only for the short or medium term would I play Cisse like.

 

At this stage a strike force of Ayoze and Mitro won't get us enough goals. Would like to see both in the team sooner rather than later though. 

 

The persecution complex is strong in this one.

 

Buddy, Ayoze was the least of our problems against Palace and Leicester when our entire f***ing midfield was non existent.

Bearing in mind Ayoze plays behind rather than alongside the striker, should he not shoulder some of the blame for our abysmal midfield given that it's his job to help out to an extent? By contrast, De Jong more or less played the same role at the weekend and made a decent contribution towards possession, pressing, winning the ball back and the like. I'm a huge fan of Ayoze for the record but I think it's very generous to call him the least of our problems recently - he's been poor the last couple of games.

 

While both he and Mitro were ineffective in those games, I still think the main issues lie further down south from where Ayoze plays, we so badly need at least 1 solid DM, I am tired of hitting my head against the wall in the hope this dramatic exhortation translates to us actually getting one in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

What Cisse offered against Liverpool was width (stretching play) and off the ball runs inbetween and in behind. He didn't work their defenders physically, but he sure made them move around and if you can make defenders move around you help create space and openings for team-mates and help to destabilise a back-four. Mitrovic doesn't do this. He backs into his marker, wins a few balls and slugs it out. He is better than Cisse at holding the ball up and in the air, he is more of a physical presence, but Cisse is a goal threat and more mobile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

If we are to get the best out of Mitrovic, he needs wingers and crosses and someone buzzing off of him. Basically similar to how we were set up under Sir Bobby. Mitrovic will only work with a Bellamy type alongside him and wingers who can cross the ball. We lack the right players all over the park in general regardless of systems and tactics Mind so it's a bit pointless at the moment trying to analyse everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Cisse has looked good the last couple of games, but this is Cisse we're talking about FFS. How long is this going to last? How long until he returns to being perennially off-side and disinterested, planning his next wedding decor in his head? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

I agree Cisse has looked good the last couple of games, but this is Cisse we're talking about FFS. How long is this going to last? How long until he returns to being perennially off-side and disinterested, planning his next wedding decor in his head? 

 

Personally I'd get rid of him in January and go for someone like Austin, but as its stands he is our best bet for a goal and our best bet at making things tick with what we have behind him in midfield.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Cisse has looked good the last couple of games, but this is Cisse we're talking about FFS. How long is this going to last? How long until he returns to being perennially off-side and disinterested, planning his next wedding decor in his head? 

 

It's a squad game, man. This is the benefit of having competition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

By the way in classic N.O backtracking mode, my comments about Mitrovic where stupid, but the Norwich game aside, where a I was hoodwinked a tad, he has looked extremely average for us and I'm not liking a few of his traits like. We can't just write him off though and given his cost, he needs the right players around him to do well and we lack those players badly. I personally believe if McClaren had his own way, we wouldn't have went for a Mitrovic type forward, he likes his mobile off the cuff type forwards doesn't he Hasslebaink, Yakubu, that Brazillian fella from Holland etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He might, just might, have decided to protect 2 young players and gone for more experience up top to try and lead the team better.

 

Agreed. I didn't think it was correct but it makes sense. He put out the most experienced team he could and has been trending that way.Flies in the face of "throw in absolutely anyone else... Thauvin... Mbabu.. GOUFFRAN" that has been prevalent on this board the last few weeks. The lads that had been left out.. Cisse and De Jong played with some fire too.

 

 

Long term neither will prove the answer. One is bound to return to shitness when comfortable and the other will get injured. But we need results now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely everything you want from a centre forward after he came on. Won headers, held it up, brought others into play, bullied their centre halves and got a goal and an assist.

 

More of this please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...