triggs Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 It did happen to Chelsea. Aye, probably the most famous football racism case there has been in recent years Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 If it took 3-months and he was still found guilty then you can be canny sure they have a good case, like How? Either he did it and there is evidence that week or he never. How can it take 3 months. It could of dragged on that long it would of looked even more of a joke if he was found not guilty I've no idea, maybe we got our lawyers involved or something which slowed things down? It's all guess work, but they wouldn't have just found him guilty for no reason, and they aren't just doing it to 'make the league interesting' which seems to get thrown about every-time a decision goes against us. I hope there's a chance he gets off on an appeal but I doubt it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubestationatmidnight Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Ban doesn't kick in until appeal lodged/not lodged. Can play v Sheff Wed Run the risk of him missing Brighton if they don't just accept it. Why just accept it if he and the club are saying he never did it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Ban doesn't kick in until appeal lodged/not lodged. Can play v Sheff Wed Run the risk of him missing Brighton if they don't just accept it. points in the bag the most important thing at this stage tho. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rompe Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 When will we get to know what he said? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 If it took 3-months and he was still found guilty then you can be canny sure they have a good case, like How? Either he did it and there is evidence that week or he never. How can it take 3 months. It could of dragged on that long it would of looked even more of a joke if he was found not guilty Thank fuck you're not on a jury. "All the evidence points to him being guilty but it happened a few months ago and not last week so he must be not guilty" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubestationatmidnight Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 If it took 3-months and he was still found guilty then you can be canny sure they have a good case, like How? Either he did it and there is evidence that week or he never. How can it take 3 months. It could of dragged on that long it would of looked even more of a joke if he was found not guilty I've no idea, maybe we got our lawyers involved or something which slowed things down? It's all guess work, but they wouldn't have just found him guilty for no reason, and they aren't just doing it to 'make the league interesting' which seems to get thrown about every-time a decision goes against us. I hope there's a chance he gets off on an appeal but I doubt it. That's certainly how it looks to me. Just so happens to be the best player in the league as well. Just when wolves beat us and we're getting all carried away at there own promotion hopes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasper Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 What a joke that is. Pathetic jealous people. Shame we will still walk this tinpot league without him for 5 games. So it's taken 3 months to say he's guilty. Pathetic. Getting hampered on and off the pitch by refs and panels. Nice try but still won't stop us Boohoo it took them too long to give a penalty to a racist player. Poor Jonjo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubestationatmidnight Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 If it took 3-months and he was still found guilty then you can be canny sure they have a good case, like How? Either he did it and there is evidence that week or he never. How can it take 3 months. It could of dragged on that long it would of looked even more of a joke if he was found not guilty Thank f*** you're not on a jury. "All the evidence points to him being guilty but it happened a few months ago and not last week so he must be not guilty" There obviously is no evidence or it wouldn't of took 3 months. Last I heard it was just 2 of our players words against 2 wolves players. I would rather side with ours Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 If it took 3-months and he was still found guilty then you can be canny sure they have a good case, like How? Either he did it and there is evidence that week or he never. How can it take 3 months. It could of dragged on that long it would of looked even more of a joke if he was found not guilty I've no idea, maybe we got our lawyers involved or something which slowed things down? It's all guess work, but they wouldn't have just found him guilty for no reason, and they aren't just doing it to 'make the league interesting' which seems to get thrown about every-time a decision goes against us. I hope there's a chance he gets off on an appeal but I doubt it. That's certainly how it looks to me. Just so happens to be the best player in the league as well. Just when wolves beat us and we're getting all carried away at there own promotion hopes You've got problems if you think it's a conspiracy against nufc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Honestly though we're very lucky he's only got 5 games Combined with the pretty unusual rescinding of his red against Forrest he's a pretty fortunate lad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 If it took 3-months and he was still found guilty then you can be canny sure they have a good case, like How? Either he did it and there is evidence that week or he never. How can it take 3 months. It could of dragged on that long it would of looked even more of a joke if he was found not guilty Thank f*** you're not on a jury. "All the evidence points to him being guilty but it happened a few months ago and not last week so he must be not guilty" There obviously is no evidence or it wouldn't of took 3 months. Last I heard it was just 2 of our players words against 2 wolves players. I would rather side with ours If that's the criterion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasper Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 If it took 3-months and he was still found guilty then you can be canny sure they have a good case, like How? Either he did it and there is evidence that week or he never. How can it take 3 months. It could of dragged on that long it would of looked even more of a joke if he was found not guilty Thank f*** you're not on a jury. "All the evidence points to him being guilty but it happened a few months ago and not last week so he must be not guilty" There obviously is no evidence or it wouldn't of took 3 months. Last I heard it was just 2 of our players words against 2 wolves players. I would rather side with ours There is obviously evidence or they wouldn't have found him guilty at all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 When will we get to know what he said? http://i.imgur.com/orjzALJ.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 If it took 3-months and he was still found guilty then you can be canny sure they have a good case, like How? Either he did it and there is evidence that week or he never. How can it take 3 months. It could of dragged on that long it would of looked even more of a joke if he was found not guilty Thank f*** you're not on a jury. "All the evidence points to him being guilty but it happened a few months ago and not last week so he must be not guilty" There obviously is no evidence or it wouldn't of took 3 months. Last I heard it was just 2 of our players words against 2 wolves players. I would rather side with ours There obviously is evidence if they've banned and charged him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Bad news. Hope he didn't say anything, but I can't see how we can successfully appeal it. Best case is it being reduced by a match and/or being a lower fine IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Honestly though we're very lucky he's only got 5 games Combined with the pretty unusual rescinding of his red against Forrest he's a pretty fortunate lad. Agreed. If it's true what I've heard he said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Honestly though we're very lucky he's only got 5 games Combined with the pretty unusual rescinding of his red against Forrest he's a pretty fortunate lad. Agreed. If it's true what I've heard he said. PM if you cannot write it on here? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 If it took 3-months and he was still found guilty then you can be canny sure they have a good case, like How? Either he did it and there is evidence that week or he never. How can it take 3 months. It could of dragged on that long it would of looked even more of a joke if he was found not guilty Thank f*** you're not on a jury. "All the evidence points to him being guilty but it happened a few months ago and not last week so he must be not guilty" There obviously is no evidence or it wouldn't of took 3 months. Last I heard it was just 2 of our players words against 2 wolves players. I would rather side with ours Aye, obviously Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Heard the panel was made up solely of Everton/Sunlun/Villa/Hull fans. Absolutely disgusting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubestationatmidnight Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 The same FA who have just gave Gareth Southgate a 4 year contract. They don't know what day it is man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Hope the cup game goes to a replay now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 When will we get to know what he said? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 The same FA who have just gave Gareth Southgate a 4 year contract. They don't know what day it is man God man your are pathetic. The same fa that rescinded both of our red cards vs forest, admitting the referee had made mistakes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JP Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Worth noting Brighton game is 28th Jan same weekend as FA Cup 4th round which you'd expect atleast one of the sides to make. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now