Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

sunder↓and

Greg

by Greg
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Benwell Lad

Benwell Lad

Posted
Posted

So your retort to thousands of posts celebrating your great victory over the journalist and your fans chanting support for a paedophile is the horse punching thing  :lol:

You'd really be better off posting on RTG than coming on here all the time attempting to be some mackem missionary voice of reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Seymour

Seymour

Posted
Posted

just seen on that long thread about the echo that we are the obsessed ones :lol:

the lack of self awareness is scary

 

Theyve made a massive deal out of something yet again so they can spend yet another day talking and slagging us off

 

Thats all they ever do, its just an excuse of obsesssing over newcastle instead of supporting the club they apparantly love so much

Link to post
Share on other sites
samptime29

samptime29

Posted
Posted

Put down the pitchfork, Benwell Lad. SM isn't bad.

you can smell the RTG on him (even if hes trying to cover it), with mackems its word vomit they cant help themselves

 

Nah SM is alreet. He has a nibble here and there - but that's fine. 90% of RTG is just so bad though.

Link to post
Share on other sites
shintonsghost

shintonsghost

Posted
Posted

Put down the pitchfork, Benwell Lad. SM isn't bad.

you can smell the RTG on him (even if hes trying to cover it), with mackems its word vomit they cant help themselves

 

 

Totally agree....its the snidy remarks he pops up with when he's rattled.they all do it, show the true colours when they arent trying to fit in that sickens me.

 

 

He tries to be nice to stay here.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Fatwax

Fatwax

Posted
Posted

Put down the pitchfork, Benwell Lad. SM isn't bad.

you can smell the RTG on him (even if hes trying to cover it), with mackems its word vomit they cant help themselves

 

 

Totally agree....its the snidy remarks he pops up with when he's rattled.they all do it, show the true colours when they arent trying to fit in that sickens me.

 

 

He tries to be nice to stay here.

 

Your argument makes no sense. If he didn't want to be here he wouldn't pretend or whatever you're on about.

 

He either hates us and doesn't want to be around us, he's pretending for some bizarre social experiment or he's a fan of our local rival and has differing opinion to us on a number of things for that reason. He doesn't need to be 'baited' or whatever to be caught out. He'll either turn out to be a prick or more likely... he won't be, but he'll clash with us due to, y'know, the whole local rivalry thing.

 

Assuming it's a he. Could be a cheesy chip eating, blue pop drinking mackem slag. They're all like that you know. Seething.

Link to post
Share on other sites
UncleBingo

UncleBingo

Posted
Posted

 

 

You (Sunderland people) are celebrating like you've won something tonight  :lol:

You (Sunderland people) are far more upset by a Mag journalist working for your local rag than you were about your club  playing a paedophile.

You come on here regularly claiming not to be like most of your fellow supporters and hide your RTG identity.

You probably have very different opinions when you're on home turf.

 

You Newcastle people all punch horses.

You Newcastle people all smash up the Toon after a big defeat etc. etc.etc.

 

Lazy stereotyping.

 

I've never claimed not to be like most of my fellow fans. On the contrary, I suspect most Sunderland fans are just like me. We live and work with Mags day in, day out, and get on very well with a bit of p*ss taking every now and then. One of my best mates is from the darkside (well almost, he's from Hexham) and we've never had a cross word. People get carried away on the internet and the security they get from the anonymity.

 

I rarely post on RTG and if I do it's never in the PF forum.

 

It's not just the PF forum mind you. I was having a look.at the general chat section and virtually every thread gets infected by Newcastle hatred somehow.

Was particularly amused by a 'Biggest s*** hole in the North East thread on there the other day. Needless to say, anywhere North of the Tyne featured heavily but had to laugh when one goon was seriously suggesting Tynemouth and Whitley Bay as genuine candidates.......he himself was from South Shields. Tynemouth man!

 

I have to agree though that most of the Mackems I know are decent enough folk, and that place is in no way representative of their fan base. However, I did work there a lot when we were in our pomp under a Keegan and the anti Newcastle hatred I witnessed on a daily basis was incredible......particularly from the older generation. Not towards me I may add, it would just creep into general conversation before my football allegiance was known.....the women were the worst.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Raconteur

Raconteur

Posted
Posted

Put down the pitchfork, Benwell Lad. SM isn't bad.

you can smell the RTG on him (even if hes trying to cover it), with mackems its word vomit they cant help themselves

 

 

Totally agree....its the snidy remarks he pops up with when he's rattled.they all do it, show the true colours when they arent trying to fit in that sickens me.

 

 

He tries to be nice to stay here.

 

Your argument makes no sense. If he didn't want to be here he wouldn't pretend or whatever you're on about.

 

He either hates us and doesn't want to be around us, he's pretending for some bizarre social experiment or he's a fan of our local rival and has differing opinion to us on a number of things for that reason. He doesn't need to be 'baited' or whatever to be caught out. He'll either turn out to be a prick or more likely... he won't be, but he'll clash with us due to, y'know, the whole local rivalry thing.

 

Assuming it's a he. Could be a cheesy chip eating, blue pop drinking mackem slag. They're all like that you know. Seething.

 

Absolutely - especially as we've had some proper spackers like Wireside and that other dozy cunt who posted using the same name here and there (the name of whom I can't remember, but he was decent for a while and then flipped to full fuckwit mode)

 

Stray Mackem is a pretty good sport considering we have some proper rabid mackem-baiters here.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sima

Sima

Posted
Posted

 

Absolutely - especially as we've had some proper spackers like Wireside and that other dozy cunt who posted using the same name here and there (the name of whom I can't remember, but he was decent for a while and then flipped to full fuckwit mode)

 

Stray Mackem is a pretty good sport considering we have some proper rabid mackem-baiters here.

 

SM's never experienced a derby defeat which was the trigger for previous Sunderland supporters on here.  Not saying he will but that was the cause before.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Benwell Lad

Benwell Lad

Posted
Posted

Put down the pitchfork, Benwell Lad. SM isn't bad.

 

Not really a pitchfork attack (well not this time anyway :lol:) more just trying to explain the point which he was obviously missing or just ignoring.

In retort to comments about thousands of mackems celebrating the journalist thing or singing songs supporting Johnson he brings up the horse punching thing. Not quite the same really.

Had I said something like "all mackems attack their managers in the dug out" then of course his reply would have been justified.

More questioning his intellect/understanding than anything else.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tubestationatmidnight

Tubestationatmidnight

Posted
Posted

I honestly couldn't give a f*** about them, they are massively irrelevant. Rivals? Seriously? Rivals are someone or something that rivals you for something, a title, status or whatever. The mackems rival us for nothing. City? :lol: Please. Stadium, again please. There is nothing they can claim to rival us with or for or against. They are so far in our shadow they don't really exist. As a club, as people, as a city, as whatever. Bear in mind during the AJ trial mackems, lasses as well, teenagers even, were walking around in Mackem tops with his name on the back. Whenever I visit woolsington airport to travel abroad, I have lost count at the number of full kit Mackem family w*****s hovering around. Are they even human?

 

Spot on

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest dabe

Guest dabe

Posted
Posted

Put down the pitchfork, Benwell Lad. SM isn't bad.

 

Not really a pitchfork attack (well not this time anyway :lol:) more just trying to explain the point which he was obviously missing or just ignoring.

In retort to comments about thousands of mackems celebrating the journalist thing or singing songs supporting Johnson he brings up the horse punching thing. Not quite the same really.

Had I said something like "all mackems attack their managers in the dug out" then of course his reply would have been justified.

More questioning his intellect/understanding than anything else.

 

He's highlighting the false equivalency of tarring all of a subset with the same brush. Showing how inane an argument based on such a premise is.

 

There's some planks marauding around this thread these days, petty tribalism, it's as embarassing as stuff you see on RTG...cue retorts to the effect of "it's okay when we do it"...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lotus

Lotus

Posted
Posted

Don't agree with Stray Mackem about a few things, football nor politics, but he's a decent poster IMO.

 

He's going to be loyal to his feelings, pro Sunderland. That's totally expected. But he's an individual and representative of anyone but himself.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Benwell Lad

Benwell Lad

Posted
Posted

Put down the pitchfork, Benwell Lad. SM isn't bad.

 

Not really a pitchfork attack (well not this time anyway :lol:) more just trying to explain the point which he was obviously missing or just ignoring.

In retort to comments about thousands of mackems celebrating the journalist thing or singing songs supporting Johnson he brings up the horse punching thing. Not quite the same really.

Had I said something like "all mackems attack their managers in the dug out" then of course his reply would have been justified.

More questioning his intellect/understanding than anything else.

 

He's highlighting the false equivalency of tarring all of a subset with the same brush. Showing how inane an argument based on such a premise is.

There's some planks marauding around this thread these days, petty tribalism, it's as embarassing as stuff you see on RTG...cue retorts to the effect of "it's okay when we do it"...

 

Which I was also highlighting by comparing his horse punching jibe to them attacking managers in the dugout, not the very real and very popular support they gave to Johnson etc which was more than a "subset" (although I'm not sure what that means but assume you mean a small minority?)

 

Anyway, regarding the rest of your reply, most internet forums started going downhill years ago but to compare what goes on on here (even in this thread) to places like RTG is frankly ridiculous.

Regarding the individual in question, unlike some on here his attempt at being reasonable has not wooed me, I find his comments often snidey and condescending and would do irrespective of his football allegiance.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dembacha

Dembacha

Posted
Posted

Put down the pitchfork, Benwell Lad. SM isn't bad.

 

Not really a pitchfork attack (well not this time anyway :lol:) more just trying to explain the point which he was obviously missing or just ignoring.

In retort to comments about thousands of mackems celebrating the journalist thing or singing songs supporting Johnson he brings up the horse punching thing. Not quite the same really.

Had I said something like "all mackems attack their managers in the dug out" then of course his reply would have been justified.

More questioning his intellect/understanding than anything else.

 

He's highlighting the false equivalency of tarring all of a subset with the same brush. Showing how inane an argument based on such a premise is.

There's some planks marauding around this thread these days, petty tribalism, it's as embarassing as stuff you see on RTG...cue retorts to the effect of "it's okay when we do it"...

 

Which I was also highlighting by comparing his horse punching jibe to them attacking managers in the dugout, not the very real and very popular support they gave to Johnson etc which was more than a "subset" (although I'm not sure what that means but assume you mean a small minority?)

 

Anyway, regarding the rest of your reply, most internet forums started going downhill years ago but to compare what goes on on here (even in this thread) to places like RTG is frankly ridiculous.

Regarding the individual in question, unlike some on here his attempt at being reasonable has not wooed me, I find his comments often snidey and condescending and would do irrespective of his football allegiance.

 

Macktracking

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...