Deuce Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video ref Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 This is fucking stupid like, everyone who claimed video officiating was shit was right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Players just won't be able to celebrate goals anymore Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 I was all for it like but it cannot work if that's anything to go by, fine margin calls have never been an issue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 This is fucking stupid like, everyone who claimed video officiating was shit was right I operated correctly, the concept is a good one, but that was an absolute farce Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 I've got a bet on over 1.5 for fucks sake!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 This is fucking stupid like, everyone who claimed video officiating was shit was right I operated correctly, the concept is a good one, but that was an absolute farce I'd be all for blatant offsides being overturned but it's impossible to keep any consistency, who decides the cut off point? Being potentialy an inch offside was never really a problem but if they're to use the technology correctly (or try to) many of those close calls are going to end up like this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video refs have way more angles than the broadcasters have btw Not bothered personally. Justice for the shit call to rule out the Cameroon goal earlier Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Can't expect any football governing body to ever implement VAR correctly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video refs have way more angles than the broadcasters have btw Then they should be made public. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Is offside. Good call. http://i.imgur.com/beRmn7W.png "but VAR is rubbish " Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video refs have way more angles than the broadcasters have btw Not bothered personally. Justice for the shit call to rule out the Cameroon goal earlier Aye it's obviously offside, it never needed to be perfect though. That shite isn't good for the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Have always been firmly in the 'video ref is a shit idea' camp. Simply see no need for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Is offside. Good call. http://i.imgur.com/beRmn7W.png "but VAR is rubbish " It has nothing to do with wether it's the correct decition or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 This is fucking stupid like, everyone who claimed video officiating was shit was right I operated correctly, the concept is a good one, but that was an absolute farce I'd be all for blatant offsides being overturned but it's impossible to keep any consistency, who decides the cut off point? Being potentialy an inch offside was never really a problem but if they're to use the technology correctly (or try to) many of those close calls are going to end up like this. I can't remember who it was, but someone mentioned something similar, that it has to be clear cut and something that isn't opinionated, so like offsides, goal line clearances etc, but not whether deciding if a foul is a foul or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video refs have way more angles than the broadcasters have btw Not bothered personally. Justice for the shit call to rule out the Cameroon goal earlier Aye it's obviously offside, it never needed to be perfect though. That shite isn't good for the game. So it's ok for tight offside's to be incorrectly called? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 The whole discussion now surrounds some shite technology. What a vile, sadistic system. Keep the sport pure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video refs have way more angles than the broadcasters have btw Then they should be made public. Exactly. If they are going to use it then the viewer and fans (in stadiums with a big screen) should get all the angles and also the discussion between the video ref and normal ref should be heard on the telly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 This is fucking stupid like, everyone who claimed video officiating was shit was right I operated correctly, the concept is a good one, but that was an absolute farce I'd be all for blatant offsides being overturned but it's impossible to keep any consistency, who decides the cut off point? Being potentialy an inch offside was never really a problem but if they're to use the technology correctly (or try to) many of those close calls are going to end up like this. I can't remember who it was, but someone mentioned something similar, that it has to be clear cut and something that isn't opinionated, so like offsides, goal line clearances etc, but not whether deciding if a foul is a foul or not. That's fine, because you remove the human interpretation from it. Technology should be there to aid officials when they can't 100% be certain of a situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video refs have way more angles than the broadcasters have btw Then they should be made public. Exactly. If they are going to use it then the viewer and fans (in stadiums with a big screen) should get all the angles and also the discussion between the video ref and normal ref should be heard on the telly I agree with you on this to be honest. But this is the first major tournament with it. The main thing right now is them to get the decisions correct. I'm sure more things (such as this) can come later Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video refs have way more angles than the broadcasters have btw Then they should be made public. Exactly. If they are going to use it then the viewer and fans (in stadiums with a big screen) should get all the angles and also the discussion between the video ref and normal ref should be heard on the telly I'm gonna be sick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video refs have way more angles than the broadcasters have btw Then they should be made public. Exactly. If they are going to use it then the viewer and fans (in stadiums with a big screen) should get all the angles and also the discussion between the video ref and normal ref should be heard on the telly I'm gonna be sick. Why? it would make the public understand how these decisions are made and make the system transparent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 This is fucking stupid like, everyone who claimed video officiating was shit was right I operated correctly, the concept is a good one, but that was an absolute farce I'd be all for blatant offsides being overturned but it's impossible to keep any consistency, who decides the cut off point? Being potentialy an inch offside was never really a problem but if they're to use the technology correctly (or try to) many of those close calls are going to end up like this. Aye as well as that, in the game earlier a Portugal goal got disallowed for an offside from about 10 seconds before the goal. If you go back far enough in any goal there'll be a foul or offside Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video refs have way more angles than the broadcasters have btw Not bothered personally. Justice for the shit call to rule out the Cameroon goal earlier Aye it's obviously offside, it never needed to be perfect though. That shite isn't good for the game. Eh? You're either offside or you're not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Video refs have way more angles than the broadcasters have btw Then they should be made public. Exactly. If they are going to use it then the viewer and fans (in stadiums with a big screen) should get all the angles and also the discussion between the video ref and normal ref should be heard on the telly I'm gonna be sick. Why? it would make the public understand how these decisions are made and make the system transparent. Well, on a fundamental level I don't believe there's any need for 'VAR', but specifically regarding the listenable discussion - I'd rather minimise anything that turns the sport into more of a popcorn flick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts