Guest Micktoon Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see. Make a sentence out of the following, "go back to following netball you clueless fuckwit, if you had one more fucking braincell you could bark". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 The first posters got a point, I mean he's no Paulo Maldini is he? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Luque Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 but paulo maldini is like 60 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 The lads gone from Kingston park to St james Park, where everytime a player makes the slightest mistake....52,000 people go "ARRRRRGGGHHH MAN" He is 19 years old, and in my eyes has played just as well as stephen Carr. Only thing I saw was the fact he didnt push up and he kept the watford attack onside on a couple of occasions. But that really down to him alone... ithink there wasnt enough communication towards him.. he should have had more help from the likes of taylor and given. He's new to the back four, so he needs TIME and he needs help off people ... And people like the idiot who posted this thread should lay off or he'll just turn into a quivering wreck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 but paulo maldini is like 60 Aeroplane Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see. Make a sentence out of the following, "go back to following netball you clueless fuckwit, if you had one more fucking braincell you could bark". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
matta Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 i think he looks like a big prospect for the future, and the fact that he plays quite well out of position makes him quite valuable to our squad as it is at the moment. Can only become better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thaitoon Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 the thing about defensive players is, they dont need to have great individual talent [of course its preferable] but the requirement is to play as a unit, what roader will be working is to get them to understand their defensive duties, to get as many games together , to learn the ways of defending as a unit. Huntington looks a far better prospect than boumsong ever did, when was the last time we had 3 younguns at the back , that we didnt spend boat loads on, it reminds me of the defence when moncur and co was there, with taylor becoming the new moncur, has anyone noticed how hes trying to organise his defence, hes going to be one hell of a player, leader. no if we can hold out this season , the future for the back 4 looks good, if they can learn to play as a unit. interesting times Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Its a typival newcastle way of doing things. Blooding young kids into the team. But in a wrong position. Surely it will do the confidence no good. You actually know fuk all about football. You must be a mackem WUM tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 he played quite well - FFS He's out of the youth team into sitting on teh bench and palying at Chelski in a coupleof months and he hasn't disgraced us - I'd rather see him than Bramble on the pitch anyday Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppe Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 From Sir Bobby's book: "Supporters who immediately condemn young players for not being good enough should remember that a large measure of disorientation comes with the promotion to the first eleven. It takes time for the shock to wear off and for a boy's confidence to grow" blueyes.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nufcandy Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 he played quite well - FFS He's out of the youth team into sitting on teh bench and palying at Chelski in a coupleof months and he hasn't disgraced us - I'd rather see him than Bramble on the pitch anyday spot on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see. Make a sentence out of the following, "go back to following netball you clueless fuckwit, if you had one more fucking braincell you could bark". Another example of where abuse becomes acceptable because the admins don't agree with the initial post of the person being abused. Typical. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 From Sir Bobby's book: "Supporters who immediately condemn young players for not being good enough should remember that a large measure of disorientation comes with the promotion to the first eleven. It takes time for the shock to wear off and for a boy's confidence to grow" blueyes.gif What the f*ck did he know! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Anyone know why he didn't go to Plymouth on loan after? Didn't go to Plymouth because Hollaway had a look at him but then decided against taking him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Lol Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Its a typival newcastle way of doing things. Blooding young kids into the team. But in a wrong position. Surely it will do the confidence no good. Sol Campbell played for Spurs at right back, central midfield and striker for about 20 matches before he played at the heart of the defence, which was always going to be his final destinaton. It simply gave him an opportunity to get used to the pace of the first team whilst getting a bit more support around him than he would have done as a central defender. It's only the super confident or the top notch youngsters that go straight to CD. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see. your mental mate. fact. and as dave says, nice avatar. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see. Make a sentence out of the following, "go back to following netball you clueless fuckwit, if you had one more fucking braincell you could bark". Another example of where abuse becomes acceptable because the admins don't agree with the initial post of the person being abused. Typical. No comeback fellers? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,20035.0.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,20035.0.html I couldn't give two fucks if you ban him, and I'm not trying to get him banned. I'm simply asking why he wasn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Personally I think the original poster is clearly on a wind-up, aiming to get bites. Check my posts in this thread confirming this. These bites have arrived, and the poster has not backed up his 'opinion'. It's the same as when kingdawson comes on purely to wind people up. Therefore I think he's deserving of everything he gets, as it's clearly meant that way IMO. Should we ban everyone who told mufcgeordie/Lee Stewart what they thought of him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Personally I think the original poster is clearly on a wind-up, aiming to get bites. Check my posts in this thread confirming this. These bites have arrived, and the poster has not backed up his 'opinion'. It's the same as when kingdawson comes on purely to wind people up. Therefore I think he's deserving of everything he gets, as it's clearly meant that way IMO. Should we ban everyone who told mufcgeordie/Lee Stewart what they thought of him? So abuse is fine if you think the person it's aimed at deserves it? That's a new one. So despite indigo admitting he was harsh in banning me for posting a youtube link, do you not therefore think my abuse towards him was justified and the subsequent ban unjustified? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Personally I think the original poster is clearly on a wind-up, aiming to get bites. Check my posts in this thread confirming this. These bites have arrived, and the poster has not backed up his 'opinion'. It's the same as when kingdawson comes on purely to wind people up. Therefore I think he's deserving of everything he gets, as it's clearly meant that way IMO. Should we ban everyone who told mufcgeordie/Lee Stewart what they thought of him? So abuse is fine if you think the person it's aimed at deserves it? That's a new one. So despite indigo admitting he was harsh in banning me for posting a youtube link, do you not therefore think my abuse towards him was justified and the subsequent ban unjustified? I think it comes down to common sense in the end mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Common sense? That's a new one. :roll: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 We've been letting abuse against blatant WUMs go for ages. Douga signed up yesterday primarily to have a go at Huntington ffs. Still, any excuse for thompers to whine like a little girl, eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now