Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So crap. Yeah it's technically correct but fuck that, man. The rule needs looking at. Was there an advantage gained? No. So it's a goal.

 

Not even necessarily technically correct

 

If its that close it has to be let go, the pixels on the still frame a so poor its impossible to tell for sure

Link to post
Share on other sites

So crap. Yeah it's technically correct but fuck that, man. The rule needs looking at. Was there an advantage gained? No. So it's a goal.

 

Not even necessarily technically correct

 

If its that close it has to be let go, the pixels on the still frame a so poor its impossible to tell for sure

 

And there is no way the studio have paused it at the exact moment the ball leaves the players foot.  And then framerate will further reduce the accuracy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be so easy to say, "yeah, let's have an 'umpires call' style 5 to 10 cm margin for error* on tight offside calls when being reviewed by VAR."

 

*I guess someone could actually work out what the margin for error is with the technology.  But that would mean the FA would have to stop with their 100% accurate propaganda.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should be based on feet being in line imo, you want forwards to be leaning forward to encourage goals being scored. Benefit of the doubt is meant to go to the attacker for that reason, not ruling it out as 2mm of armpit is offide

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh God, "Net Spend", fuck off.

 

Average basic annual pay in 2018 according to SportingIntelligence's annual survey:

 

http://www.sportingintelligence.com/2018/11/26/messis-barcelona-break-10m-a-year-barrier-to-hit-no1-in-global-pay-261101/

 

1. Barca 10.45M (roughly 200K pw)

2. Real 8.1M

 

then lots of NBA teams

 

then some Premier league clubs:

 

10. Man U - 6.5M

20. Man City - 6M

35. Chelsea - 5M

38. Liverpool - 4.9M (94K pw)

39. Arsenal - 4.9M

66. Spurs - 3.5M (67K pw)

69. Everton - 3,3M

 

etc past West Ham, Crystal Palace, Leicester, Southampton.

 

141. Bournemouth - 2M (38K pw)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does he not mean net spend in transfer fees and that refer to salaries?

 

I presume he means net spend in transfer fees. My point is that that's not a great measure of spending - or in his own words "spending sense". Haven't got on that particular high horse for a while so wanted to get back in the saddle for a tic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...