tgarve Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Why do people not like panenkas? It’s a needless risk most of the time. Managers must hate them. I'd say a higher proportion of panenka's go in than normal penalties Possibly, but that’s probably down to volume. If the panenka were the standard the conversion rate would be atrocious. Very true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 The fuss being made over Rodriguez, but none of these commentators or their favourite managers would play him. It's so annoying. Carlo has set the team up to accommodate him nicely, as he's not the best athlete and doesn't run around a lot, and kudos to him for having the sense and mind to do that. All these lot would bench him for being lazy, and wouldn't find the right system, but to listen to them fuss over all the things he does well though. So weird and bizarre. Bruce wouldn’t know what to do with James, so he’d have him on the bench. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 There is a distinct chance that we're going to win the league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 There is a distinct chance that we're going to win the league. :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 As a rule of thumb they usually add about 30 seconds for a goal Don't they have allowances for substitutions? You'd think they'd have the same for goals. Subs are a ~minute. Goals are nothing if there aren't long celebrations. Otherwise there would be 5-6 mins added time each game with lots of goals. When are there ever 10 or 12 goals in a game The general rule of thumb is 30secs for goals and subs The subs thing isn't a general rule of thumb though, it's a rule. A rule that we are aware of. I'm sure we'd know if there was a rule regarding goals. Law 7. Allowance for time lost Allowance is made by the referee in each half for all time lost in that half through: substitutions assessment and/or removal of injured players wasting time disciplinary sanctions medical stoppages permitted by competition rules e.g. ‘drinks’ breaks (which should not exceed one minute) and ‘cooling’ breaks (ninety seconds to three minutes) delays relating to VAR 'checks' and 'reviews; any other cause, including any significant delay to a restart (e.g. goal celebrations) The fourth official indicates the minimum additional time decided by the referee at the end of the final minute of each half. The additional time may be increased by the referee but not reduced. The referee must not compensate for a timekeeping error during the first half by changing the length of the second half. So not goals. Any other cause, PGMOL have said standard PL practice is 30 seconds per goal. OK. But the example given is goal celebration. So it definitely doesn't stipulate goals. I haven't got a clue who PGMOL are, tbh. I get substitutions and goal celebrations as they are deliberate tactics to run the clock down. but you don't score a goal to run the clock down. Look them up - it’s not hard. I’d recommend Google. To quote them - and they run/ manage the referees “they do add time. It's around 30 seconds as a rule of thumb, unless they spend five minutes celebrating. Every situation is different, they'll take each one on its merit.” I think you should quote the whole answer: "Is the clock stopped for goals? No, it's not. But they do add time (to cover celebrations). It's around 30 seconds as a rule of thumb, unless they spend five minutes celebrating. Every situation is different, they'll take each one on its merit." So no, goals do not automatically mean added time. There might be no celebrations at all. Implied, not said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cheesy Beans Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Mad to think if there were fans in the ground, a large majority would have left before that penalty was given as there would be no way of them knowing it was being reviewed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Mad to think if there were fans in the ground, a large majority would have left before that penalty was given as there would be no way of them knowing it was being reviewed. Well that’s wrong on so many levels If your an actual fan who stays till the end of the game there’s no way you would have left there You would be expecting some sort of review based upon the players reaction So if you walked out there you either know nothing about football or are just trying to catch the bus and don’t really give a fuck about the result Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 That Chelsea kit is minging Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 hahaha chelsea Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
binnsy Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Kepa would have saved that... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Alonso is so slow and ponderous in a back four, starting from deeper positions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Sort of already at the position of hoping teams like WBA lose knowing we’ll undoubtedly be in a relegation fight with them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Exciting times for Everton, that’s what happens when you appoint a world class coach and back him... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Chelsea kit is even worse on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 5 at the back. 23% possesion. Haven't had a kick since I turned it on. Somehow winning with opponents missing glaring chances. Feels a bit familiar, this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Werner’s struggling, making a lot of wrong decisions and losing the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 5 at the back. 23% possesion. Haven't had a kick since I turned it on. Somehow winning with opponents missing glaring chances. Feels a bit familiar, this. Look far more convincing when they look to counter though, and they're not all sat on top of each other when defending. I think they'll have a chance this season, they've had some tough opening fixtures. Won't be surprised at all if they beat us. Think they look better organised. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Werner’s struggling, making a lot of wrong decisions and losing the ball. This is the post of someone who has a bet on him or has him as their fantasy captain. Am I right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 hahahaha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 The Ladyboy :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 The state of that man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 As a rule of thumb they usually add about 30 seconds for a goal Don't they have allowances for substitutions? You'd think they'd have the same for goals. Subs are a ~minute. Goals are nothing if there aren't long celebrations. Otherwise there would be 5-6 mins added time each game with lots of goals. When are there ever 10 or 12 goals in a game The general rule of thumb is 30secs for goals and subs The subs thing isn't a general rule of thumb though, it's a rule. A rule that we are aware of. I'm sure we'd know if there was a rule regarding goals. Law 7. Allowance for time lost Allowance is made by the referee in each half for all time lost in that half through: substitutions assessment and/or removal of injured players wasting time disciplinary sanctions medical stoppages permitted by competition rules e.g. ‘drinks’ breaks (which should not exceed one minute) and ‘cooling’ breaks (ninety seconds to three minutes) delays relating to VAR 'checks' and 'reviews; any other cause, including any significant delay to a restart (e.g. goal celebrations) The fourth official indicates the minimum additional time decided by the referee at the end of the final minute of each half. The additional time may be increased by the referee but not reduced. The referee must not compensate for a timekeeping error during the first half by changing the length of the second half. So not goals. Any other cause, PGMOL have said standard PL practice is 30 seconds per goal. OK. But the example given is goal celebration. So it definitely doesn't stipulate goals. I haven't got a clue who PGMOL are, tbh. I get substitutions and goal celebrations as they are deliberate tactics to run the clock down. but you don't score a goal to run the clock down. Look them up - it’s not hard. I’d recommend Google. To quote them - and they run/ manage the referees “they do add time. It's around 30 seconds as a rule of thumb, unless they spend five minutes celebrating. Every situation is different, they'll take each one on its merit.” I think you should quote the whole answer: "Is the clock stopped for goals? No, it's not. But they do add time (to cover celebrations). It's around 30 seconds as a rule of thumb, unless they spend five minutes celebrating. Every situation is different, they'll take each one on its merit." So no, goals do not automatically mean added time. There might be no celebrations at all. Implied, not said. Put the glue down and step away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Joey Barton was right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 Werner’s struggling, making a lot of wrong decisions and losing the ball. This is the post of someone who has a bet on him or has him as their fantasy captain. Am I right? Nah, I don’t play fantasy football these days. Just think chelsea have a lot of new young forrins, looks a risk right now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts