DJ_NUFC Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 I haven’t seen unhinged trolling of such high quality since the leaked JFK phone call. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Yes, Steve Bruce's relegation scrap is exactly the same as SBR finishing 5th. Exactly. I mean christ, what a comparison. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 I haven’t seen unhinged trolling of such high quality since the leaked JFK phone call. Jesus Christ, that’s the worst thing I’ve ever seen. Absolute mess of a human being. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Presumably it's just doing the Talksport thing at this point? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Just contrary opinions to get reaction I guess, yeah. That and a natural affiliation (parasitic relationship) with the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Corrupted Ashley apologist Samuel has gotten stuck into West Ham's owners in the paper today. Wonder why? Not nice when its your own club i guess but perfectly fine somewhere else. They've had a £240million net spend, he says, since they took over but the "football is rotten" so a fans revolt is justified. Dear me. Imagine having that for 13years, a fraction of the net spend, not trying to move forward and an indefinite future of the same ahead. This guy is pathetic and pathetic at his job. Sullivan and Gold have missed a trick. For the right price he'd turn a blind eye and even condone whatever grievance they have, if there is one beyond being frationally worse than their 40year average on the field. *mackems would have you believe there's no such thing as net spend and were the only ones that mention it. Apart from that I wanted to rip the thing up and choke him on it. difference is I suppose Gold and Sullivan sold west hams home and moved to the soulless olympic stadium with the promise of champions league competing for trophys etc and where are they? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John P Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 What an annoying prick this guy is. Aside from making absolutely ludicrous comparisons and writing utter rubbish, the way he speaks and responds to people on Twitter is incredibly condescending and patronising. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tribesman Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Luke Edwards does admit he just does it to get a reaction from people. He has completely gone off the rails since last summer even before Bruce was linked with the job. The only journalists I have time for now are George Caulkin and Craig Hope. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Just ignore him them. He works for a hard-right trolling outlet, it's not hard. I can't imagine many in the NE postcode are ardent Telegraph readers. The Brucicle lads are way worse IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Read a cracking article about Leeds class of '93 and their comparison with the Man Utd class of '92. Basically, Howard Wilkinson > Alex Ferguson. Where Fergie got rid of Kanchelskis, Ince etc to allow the younger generation to thrive, Wilkinson brought in Brian Deane and Nigel Worthington. The rest is history. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfcastle Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Corrupted Ashley apologist Samuel has gotten stuck into West Ham's owners in the paper today. Wonder why? Not nice when its your own club i guess but perfectly fine somewhere else. They've had a £240million net spend, he says, since they took over but the "football is rotten" so a fans revolt is justified. Dear me. Imagine having that for 13years, a fraction of the net spend, not trying to move forward and an indefinite future of the same ahead. This guy is pathetic and pathetic at his job. Sullivan and Gold have missed a trick. For the right price he'd turn a blind eye and even condone whatever grievance they have, if there is one beyond being frationally worse than their 40year average on the field. *mackems would have you believe there's no such thing as net spend and were the only ones that mention it. Apart from that I wanted to rip the thing up and choke him on it. difference is I suppose Gold and Sullivan sold west hams home and moved to the soulless olympic stadium with the promise of champions league competing for trophys etc and where are they? They're around where they usually are and the moving to a bigger stadium was obviously an attempt to grow the club and move it forward. If they stayed at limited capacity Upton Park they couldn't do that. Man City did the same exact thing for the same exact reasons. It doesn't always work out and every new stadium is soulless but they tried. Its the promise everybody has when moving to a new ground and its never panned out. mackems, boro, Millwall, Darlington, Spurs are no better now than before, Southampton are no better. Doesn't mean its the wrong thing to do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Boy Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Corrupted Ashley apologist Samuel has gotten stuck into West Ham's owners in the paper today. Wonder why? Not nice when its your own club i guess but perfectly fine somewhere else. They've had a £240million net spend, he says, since they took over but the "football is rotten" so a fans revolt is justified. Dear me. Imagine having that for 13years, a fraction of the net spend, not trying to move forward and an indefinite future of the same ahead. This guy is pathetic and pathetic at his job. Sullivan and Gold have missed a trick. For the right price he'd turn a blind eye and even condone whatever grievance they have, if there is one beyond being frationally worse than their 40year average on the field. *mackems would have you believe there's no such thing as net spend and were the only ones that mention it. Apart from that I wanted to rip the thing up and choke him on it. difference is I suppose Gold and Sullivan sold west hams home and moved to the soulless olympic stadium with the promise of champions league competing for trophys etc and where are they? They're around where they usually are and the moving to a bigger stadium was obviously an attempt to grow the club and move it forward. If they stayed at limited capacity Upton Park they couldn't do that. Man City did the same exact thing for the same exact reasons. It doesn't always work out and every new stadium is soulless but they tried. Its the promise everybody has when moving to a new ground and its never panned out. mackems, boro, Millwall, Darlington, Spurs are no better now than before, Southampton are no better. Doesn't mean its the wrong thing to do. it is the wrong thing to do. same when we nearly moved to leazes park Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Corrupted Ashley apologist Samuel has gotten stuck into West Ham's owners in the paper today. Wonder why? Not nice when its your own club i guess but perfectly fine somewhere else. They've had a £240million net spend, he says, since they took over but the "football is rotten" so a fans revolt is justified. Dear me. Imagine having that for 13years, a fraction of the net spend, not trying to move forward and an indefinite future of the same ahead. This guy is pathetic and pathetic at his job. Sullivan and Gold have missed a trick. For the right price he'd turn a blind eye and even condone whatever grievance they have, if there is one beyond being frationally worse than their 40year average on the field. *mackems would have you believe there's no such thing as net spend and were the only ones that mention it. Apart from that I wanted to rip the thing up and choke him on it. difference is I suppose Gold and Sullivan sold west hams home and moved to the soulless olympic stadium with the promise of champions league competing for trophys etc and where are they? They're around where they usually are and the moving to a bigger stadium was obviously an attempt to grow the club and move it forward. If they stayed at limited capacity Upton Park they couldn't do that. Man City did the same exact thing for the same exact reasons. It doesn't always work out and every new stadium is soulless but they tried. Its the promise everybody has when moving to a new ground and its never panned out. mackems, boro, Millwall, Darlington, Spurs are no better now than before, Southampton are no better. Doesn't mean its the wrong thing to do. it is the wrong thing to do. same when we nearly moved to leazes park Seems to have worked out quite well for Spurs. Cracking atmosphere there on Sunday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Spurs is right in Tottenham at the exact same site, seems a great move. Obviously West Ham is bad because it's a different town and a bad stadium. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 it helps that new white hart lane is basically where the old one was and was designed from the start for football, the olympic stadium is a hybrid athletic's stadium/converted to football stadium that Gold and Sullivan jumped on because it was a very cheap way of getting a 60k stadium and be able to sell off Upton Park for a decent chunk of cash Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Let off a bit of steam to Luke Edwards on one of his Tweets. I probably come across as a bit of a cock but I feel better for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 He should be getting stuck into his mate Edwards whilst watching this shite Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 Found myself half agreeing with Mark Douglas here...crikey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Next Big Thing: Liverpool’s new £50m training complex has been designed with input from Edwards, Inglethorpe, Klopp and Henderson https://theathletic.com/1584555/2020/02/11/liverpool-training-complex-kirkby-next-big-thing/?source=shared-article Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Gorgeous facility Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Found myself half agreeing with Mark Douglas here...crikey. Not that surprising since he's just saying what quite a few, including you have been saying from pretty much August. I mean tbf, Douglas is one of the better local journalists IMO, but even he tends to chop and change his opinion after a couple of seemingly good results. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInfiniteOdyssey Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Next Big Thing: Liverpool’s new £50m training complex has been designed with input from Edwards, Inglethorpe, Klopp and Henderson https://theathletic.com/1584555/2020/02/11/liverpool-training-complex-kirkby-next-big-thing/?source=shared-article The Athletic is well worth the subscription, some fantastic content on there. Also just looking at the plans for that facility, we're so far behind it's unreal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Next Big Thing: Liverpool’s new £50m training complex has been designed with input from Edwards, Inglethorpe, Klopp and Henderson https://theathletic.com/1584555/2020/02/11/liverpool-training-complex-kirkby-next-big-thing/?source=shared-article The Athletic is well worth the subscription, some fantastic content on there. Also just looking at the plans for that facility, we're so far behind it's unreal. The gym in our office building that has a $10 per month fee to use is better than the NUFC gym. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickthemagpie Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Presumably the Leicester City one will be twice as good as it's costing twice as much- https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/drone-footage-shows-progress-leicester-3412746 It's all very depressing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now