Leicester City 5-0 Newcastle United - 29/09/19 - post match from pg20

[Guest]

Pissed off still at this. Also think the fans have ruined the ‘Who’s that team’ song today. Was being sung for the sake of it today rather than any meaning to it.

[Consortium of one]

Didn't watch after 2-0 so I missed the collapse.  First, I'm not convinced that Hayden deserved red.  Praet had a heavy touch and it was a 50/50 ball, IMO, which Hayden got to first.  During the halftime show on NBCSN one of the Robbie's called it "cowardly" which is BS.

 

I'm about to stop watching altogether as it's too depressing.

[Greg]

Didn't watch after 2-0 so I missed the collapse.  First, I'm not convinced that Hayden deserved red.  Praet had a heavy touch and it was a 50/50 ball, IMO, which Hayden got to first.  During the halftime show on NBCSN one of the Robbie's called it "cowardly" which is BS.

 

I'm about to stop watching altogether as it's too depressing.

 

In the modern game I'm afraid it is a red 100%.

[1964]

Didn't watch after 2-0 so I missed the collapse.  First, I'm not convinced that Hayden deserved red.  Praet had a heavy touch and it was a 50/50 ball, IMO, which Hayden got to first.  During the halftime show on NBCSN one of the Robbie's called it "cowardly" which is BS.

 

I'm about to stop watching altogether as it's too depressing.

 

In the modern game I'm afraid it is a red 100%.

And since about 2010

[Guest]

It was a shocking tackle, could have snapped his leg. Whether he got the ball or not is irrelevant.

[ToonArmy1892]

I love a fair tackle but that was 100% a red.

 

The tackle of a player who is pissed off with what's going on.

[tinoasprilla]

The worse thing about the tackle is it gives Bruce a slight excuse. Would have been five nowt with eleven players

[ToonArmy1892]

Is Shearer on MOTD?

[The Prophet]

Didn't watch it. Laughed when I saw the result

I think I might be officially desensitized.

[Raconteur]

I love a fair tackle but that was 100% a red.

 

The tackle of a player who is pissed off with what's going on.

 

At first I thought he wanted to get sent off, but it looks more like he thought he could go in full blood and guts mode because it was 50/50 - only it wasn't (really).

 

But yeah, fully hacked off and wanted to make a crunching tackle, which he got badly wrong.

[Disco]

Thankfully Steve knew we it would a pointless cost to Mike if we were to sign any central midfielders. He knows how strong we are there so Hayden will not be missed.

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Is Shearer on MOTD?

 

Nah, they actually hardly mentioned Newcastle. Just all about how brilliant Leicester are.

[Conjo]

At least it looked like the away crowd had a good day out. Couldnt see any pepper spray shower throughout the match so let's all give a big thank you to SDST.

 

Incident didn't happen in the ground but you know. Abuse your fellow fans all you like, really going to bring about regime change.

 

You dont know what abuse or militant means.

 

At least I'm not stupid enough to think an organisation raising concerns to a club, when members of said organisation ask the organisation to raise those concerns and issues -that they go ahead and do that on behalf of their members - their basic mandate and part of their fundamental function - is being in bed with Mike Ashley and supporting Sports Direct. About half of NUST members in the most recent survey stated they go to games, while your view is that nobody should go to games (I've given up going, been involved in more protests than I care to remember and will not give a penny to the club as long as Ashley is still there) that doesn't mean that those that do shouldn't be stood up for if things go wrong. You still don't appear to comprehend or understand what a supporters trust is. The trust may well come to a boycott position, and I would quite like that, but it would have to be what the members want and clearly a large numbers of members still go the match. We've got TMG, AO, EFA and all sorts pushing the boycott and more now and that's great.

 

Division and arguments amongst the fan base appears to be your approach - attack those that still go to games - this will achieve nothing - these people need to educated not belittled.

 

 

If you don't understand how you hurt the club and fellow fans by going to the match by now you never will. Most likely they majority of people still going understand that deep down but are too selfish to walk away for the greater good and deserve to get shamed and watch the awful football they are getting served at the moment.

 

You should do the absolute bare minimum to retain status as a trust until there's new ownership, while promoting walking away internally as that is literally the only way Ashley will go. I will never join an organisation that has members that still attends matches. I suspect there's more people in the same boat.

[AyeDubbleYoo]

At least it looked like the away crowd had a good day out. Couldnt see any pepper spray shower throughout the match so let's all give a big thank you to SDST.

 

Incident didn't happen in the ground but you know. Abuse your fellow fans all you like, really going to bring about regime change.

 

You dont know what abuse or militant means.

 

At least I'm not stupid enough to think an organisation raising concerns to a club, when members of said organisation ask the organisation to raise those concerns and issues -that they go ahead and do that on behalf of their members - their basic mandate and part of their fundamental function - is being in bed with Mike Ashley and supporting Sports Direct. About half of NUST members in the most recent survey stated they go to games, while your view is that nobody should go to games (I've given up going, been involved in more protests than I care to remember and will not give a penny to the club as long as Ashley is still there) that doesn't mean that those that do shouldn't be stood up for if things go wrong. You still don't appear to comprehend or understand what a supporters trust is. The trust may well come to a boycott position, and I would quite like that, but it would have to be what the members want and clearly a large numbers of members still go the match. We've got TMG, AO, EFA and all sorts pushing the boycott and more now and that's great.

 

Division and arguments amongst the fan base appears to be your approach - attack those that still go to games - this will achieve nothing - these people need to educated not belittled.

 

 

If you don't understand how you hurt the club and fellow fans by going to the match by now you never will. Most likely they majority of people still going understand that deep down but are too selfish to walk away for the greater good and deserve to get shamed and watch the awful football they are getting served at the moment.

 

You should do the absolute bare minimum to retain status as a trust until there's new ownership, while promoting walking away internally as that is literally the only way Ashley will go. I will never join an organisation that has members that still attends matches. I suspect there's more people in the same boat.

 

While I respect Greg and hate criticising fellow fans, this is completely right.

 

Admittedly it’s easier for me to walk away when I don’t live in the city.

[ToonArmy1892]

At least it looked like the away crowd had a good day out. Couldnt see any pepper spray shower throughout the match so let's all give a big thank you to SDST.

 

Incident didn't happen in the ground but you know. Abuse your fellow fans all you like, really going to bring about regime change.

 

You dont know what abuse or militant means.

 

At least I'm not stupid enough to think an organisation raising concerns to a club, when members of said organisation ask the organisation to raise those concerns and issues -that they go ahead and do that on behalf of their members - their basic mandate and part of their fundamental function - is being in bed with Mike Ashley and supporting Sports Direct. About half of NUST members in the most recent survey stated they go to games, while your view is that nobody should go to games (I've given up going, been involved in more protests than I care to remember and will not give a penny to the club as long as Ashley is still there) that doesn't mean that those that do shouldn't be stood up for if things go wrong. You still don't appear to comprehend or understand what a supporters trust is. The trust may well come to a boycott position, and I would quite like that, but it would have to be what the members want and clearly a large numbers of members still go the match. We've got TMG, AO, EFA and all sorts pushing the boycott and more now and that's great.

 

Division and arguments amongst the fan base appears to be your approach - attack those that still go to games - this will achieve nothing - these people need to educated not belittled.

 

Is the trust doing anything to try and educate people to stop going?

[ToonArmy1892]

At least it looked like the away crowd had a good day out. Couldnt see any pepper spray shower throughout the match so let's all give a big thank you to SDST.

 

Incident didn't happen in the ground but you know. Abuse your fellow fans all you like, really going to bring about regime change.

 

You dont know what abuse or militant means.

 

At least I'm not stupid enough to think an organisation raising concerns to a club, when members of said organisation ask the organisation to raise those concerns and issues -that they go ahead and do that on behalf of their members - their basic mandate and part of their fundamental function - is being in bed with Mike Ashley and supporting Sports Direct. About half of NUST members in the most recent survey stated they go to games, while your view is that nobody should go to games (I've given up going, been involved in more protests than I care to remember and will not give a penny to the club as long as Ashley is still there) that doesn't mean that those that do shouldn't be stood up for if things go wrong. You still don't appear to comprehend or understand what a supporters trust is. The trust may well come to a boycott position, and I would quite like that, but it would have to be what the members want and clearly a large numbers of members still go the match. We've got TMG, AO, EFA and all sorts pushing the boycott and more now and that's great.

 

Division and arguments amongst the fan base appears to be your approach - attack those that still go to games - this will achieve nothing - these people need to educated not belittled.

 

 

If you don't understand how you hurt the club and fellow fans by going to the match by now you never will. Most likely they majority of people still going understand that deep down but are too selfish to walk away for the greater good and deserve to get shamed and watch the awful football they are getting served at the moment.

 

You should do the absolute bare minimum to retain status as a trust until there's new ownership, while promoting walking away internally as that is literally the only way Ashley will go. I will never join an organisation that has members that still attends matches. I suspect there's more people in the same boat.

 

thats the crux of it.

 

Anyone still going isn't on NUFC's side.

[Greg]

At least it looked like the away crowd had a good day out. Couldnt see any pepper spray shower throughout the match so let's all give a big thank you to SDST.

 

Incident didn't happen in the ground but you know. Abuse your fellow fans all you like, really going to bring about regime change.

 

You dont know what abuse or militant means.

 

At least I'm not stupid enough to think an organisation raising concerns to a club, when members of said organisation ask the organisation to raise those concerns and issues -that they go ahead and do that on behalf of their members - their basic mandate and part of their fundamental function - is being in bed with Mike Ashley and supporting Sports Direct. About half of NUST members in the most recent survey stated they go to games, while your view is that nobody should go to games (I've given up going, been involved in more protests than I care to remember and will not give a penny to the club as long as Ashley is still there) that doesn't mean that those that do shouldn't be stood up for if things go wrong. You still don't appear to comprehend or understand what a supporters trust is. The trust may well come to a boycott position, and I would quite like that, but it would have to be what the members want and clearly a large numbers of members still go the match. We've got TMG, AO, EFA and all sorts pushing the boycott and more now and that's great.

 

Division and arguments amongst the fan base appears to be your approach - attack those that still go to games - this will achieve nothing - these people need to educated not belittled.

 

Is the trust doing anything to try and educate people to stop going?

 

Not enough in my opinion. NUST has many issues and I certainly don't agree with its entire direction and I have concerns with a number of board members as well but these are not things I would be willing to air in public.

 

The things that winds me up and gets me going through is the misconceptions of what a trust is, what it can and can't do and that raising concerns on certain issues to the club somehow means we all love Mike Ashley and adore Sports Direct. It's tired, lazy rhetoric. Often the machinations of people that want the trust to fail for no discernible reason. These people always exist mind - every single protest I've been involved (4 different groups/entities/movements) and then this - you always get a fair amount of abuse despite fighting for the best for your club in your spare time. People just love having a go. I'm not talking about on here when I say this - I mean more generally.

 

We seem to have a fan base that enjoys arguing with each other more than coming together as one to fight Mike Ashley.

[Greg]

At least it looked like the away crowd had a good day out. Couldnt see any pepper spray shower throughout the match so let's all give a big thank you to SDST.

 

Incident didn't happen in the ground but you know. Abuse your fellow fans all you like, really going to bring about regime change.

 

You dont know what abuse or militant means.

 

At least I'm not stupid enough to think an organisation raising concerns to a club, when members of said organisation ask the organisation to raise those concerns and issues -that they go ahead and do that on behalf of their members - their basic mandate and part of their fundamental function - is being in bed with Mike Ashley and supporting Sports Direct. About half of NUST members in the most recent survey stated they go to games, while your view is that nobody should go to games (I've given up going, been involved in more protests than I care to remember and will not give a penny to the club as long as Ashley is still there) that doesn't mean that those that do shouldn't be stood up for if things go wrong. You still don't appear to comprehend or understand what a supporters trust is. The trust may well come to a boycott position, and I would quite like that, but it would have to be what the members want and clearly a large numbers of members still go the match. We've got TMG, AO, EFA and all sorts pushing the boycott and more now and that's great.

 

Division and arguments amongst the fan base appears to be your approach - attack those that still go to games - this will achieve nothing - these people need to educated not belittled.

 

 

If you don't understand how you hurt the club and fellow fans by going to the match by now you never will. Most likely they majority of people still going understand that deep down but are too selfish to walk away for the greater good and deserve to get shamed and watch the awful football they are getting served at the moment.

 

You should do the absolute bare minimum to retain status as a trust until there's new ownership, while promoting walking away internally as that is literally the only way Ashley will go. I will never join an organisation that has members that still attends matches. I suspect there's more people in the same boat.

 

thats the crux of it.

 

Anyone still going isn't on NUFC's side.

 

30,000+ still going - so of course a fair chunk of 10,000 members will still go and telling them constantly they are the problem and aren't on NUFCs side (even if you very much believe we need  an empty stadium) isn't going to help change their minds. The only thing that rhetoric helps is the anger of the person dishing it out.

 

Right now Steve Bruce being fucking useless dinosaur is doing more for dwindling attendance than anything!

[ToonArmy1892]

Well, the club is fucked yet the trust isn't encouraging people to stay away, is it any wonder people are ridiculing it?

 

 

[Super Duper Branko Strupar]

Didn't watch it. Laughed when I saw the result

I think I might be officially desensitized.

 

Yep. Mint result, imo.

[ToonArmy1892]

Is Shearer on MOTD?

 

Nah, they actually hardly mentioned Newcastle. Just all about how brilliant Leicester are.

 

I caught the tail end of it where Richards and Kilbane were saying they have both been involved in Steve Bruce sides who have been beat 5-0, once they go 2 down heads drop, a ringing endorsement for Brewcy

[Guest Howaythetoon]

Fucking hell the barman at our resort turned it off at 2-0, just seen the score line

 

 

[Guest chopey]

Fucking hell the barman at our resort turned it off at 2-0, just seen the score line

 

TBF we got away with it, leicester were totally dominant and we were never in the game.

[Guest neesy111]

They won 5-0 without getting out of 2nd gear.

[Guest]

I know I’ve been banging on, but does this not piss anyone else off?

 

https://twitter.com/newcastlefanstv/status/1178360172311396352?s=21

 

Just seems one big joke and day out to them. That should have been fucking toxic, instead they’re singing and dancing. I know people should be able to have a laugh but this isn’t the time. It’s a fake defiance, ‘Look at us, we still support the lads, look how loyal we are’. Needs to stop.