gdm Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 Just now, Joey Linton said: No the same people who said it was off are still saying it is off. Keith had nothing to do with their original position, he's moved to where they have always been. If anything you'll probably find it's those who have hung on his every word will now choose not to believe him. Very much this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 I guess Keith will be unblocking and apologising to every one who disagreed with him on twitter now that he has changed his tune? No didn't think so. Instead of holding his hands up he's now saying he's still bound by some NDA Him and mouth of the tyne really need to meet each other, they'll get along like a house on fire. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, gdm said: Yup he knows fuck all but he’s not the reason I think it’s off. I think there has to be a point Ashley has enough waiting around and sells to someone else. I think the awful start might make him scrambling around for a new buyer. He will do after the legal cases, if they go against the takeover. Nothing is going to happen until they play out. He’s not going to waste millions in legal fees for something which (in his and his legal teams opinion) is a non runner. Edited September 2, 2021 by et tu brute Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BennyBlanco Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 I don’t know what I’m more looking forward to. The day Ashley fucks off, the day Bruce fucks off or the day the ceiling caves in on Keith the liar, that bald cunt who sucks gangsta root, the fat dentist and the sexist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishops Finger Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 I'm sure we'll know soon enough if it falls through. I think Amanda Staveley won't keep us hanging. And Ashley will spit his dummy out all over Sky Sports News. Until then there's still a little hope. About 5% in my case mind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 It’s funny because Keith is only now saying what most sensible people have been saying for 12 months. Maybe he wants everyone to forget he so confidently said the PL had lost the jurisdiction case back in July, when the hearing isn’t taking place until the end of this month. Fwiw, if the PL do lose the case at the end of this month it’ll be the most positive news we’ve had in 12 months. Wonder if he’ll have to backtrack again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beamish Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 Whitley is very quiet..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armchair Pundit Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 1 hour ago, Fantail Breeze said: It’s funny because Keith is only now saying what most sensible people have been saying for 12 months. Maybe he wants everyone to forget he so confidently said the PL had lost the jurisdiction case back in July, when the hearing isn’t taking place until the end of this month. Fwiw, if the PL do lose the case at the end of this month it’ll be the most positive news we’ve had in 12 months. Wonder if he’ll have to backtrack again? Right up until they appeal the decision for another 12 months Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, Armchair Pundit said: Right up until they appeal the decision for another 12 months I’ve no doubt they will if the judge states the case can proceed, but any appeal has to have justification. Hopefully the judge discounts any appeal, if not then pass as to how long it takes. Either way, nothing is going to happen until it plays out. Edited September 2, 2021 by et tu brute Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 2 hours ago, Beamish said: Whitley is very quiet..... To be fair to Whitley he dropped Keith and the positive takeover shite weeks ago. He was posting mainly how corrupt the PL senior staff are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 (edited) 11 hours ago, nbthree3 said: Bullshit Keith should be kept to the bullshit thread with the likes of Burnsie. The bloke is a total fantasist, talks absolute shite and craves the attention (as do the other three pricks he shares the fantasy island stage with on a Friday). Not surprisingly with some in our support, he has them hanging onto every word he says. Edited September 2, 2021 by et tu brute Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 1 hour ago, RS said: To be fair to Whitley he dropped Keith and the positive takeover shite weeks ago. He was posting mainly how corrupt the PL senior staff are. Yeah I think even Whitley can see that Bullshit Keith knows fuck all. I'm sure he will correct me if I'm wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 4 hours ago, et tu brute said: Bullshit Keith should be kept to the bullshit thread with the likes of Burnsie. The bloke is a total fantasist, talks absolute shite and craves the attention (as do the other three pricks he shares the fantasy island stage with on a Friday). Not surprisingly with some in our support, he has them hanging onto every word he says. He chats and answers a lot of questions after that tweet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 6 hours ago, Ben said: He chats and answers a lot of questions after that tweet. With more bullshit no doubt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 19 hours ago, Bishops Finger said: I'm sure we'll know soon enough if it falls through. I think Amanda Staveley won't keep us hanging. And Ashley will spit his dummy out all over Sky Sports News. Until then there's still a little hope. About 5% in my case mind While PZ Newco Limited and NCUK Investment Limited are still active I think there is a good chance that PIF are still interested. I can't see them wanting those remnants of an embarrassing failure to be hanging around if their interest in NUFC is over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 10 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: While PZ Newco Limited and NCUK Investment Limited are still active I think there is a good chance that PIF are still interested. I can't see them wanting those remnants of an embarrassing failure to be hanging around if their interest in NUFC is over. Nah, people would still be able to see them even if they weren't active any more. There's no such thing as the "remnants hanging around" or not, they don't just disappear from public record altogether. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 8 minutes ago, Joey Linton said: Nah, people would still be able to see them even if they weren't active any more. There's no such thing as the "remnants hanging around" or not, they don't just disappear from public record altogether. But they will be dissolved at some point if PIF's interest is over, I don't think it's likely that PIF would just leave them as active companies if their interest were over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 14 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: But they will be dissolved at some point if PIF's interest is over, I don't think it's likely that PIF would just leave them as active companies if their interest were over. There's absolutely nothing in their continued existence to suggest anything at all at this stage, regardless of what you "think" it could mean. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 14 minutes ago, Joey Linton said: There's absolutely nothing in their continued existence to suggest anything at all at this stage, regardless of what you "think" it could mean. Of course it suggests something, if they were dissolved PIF would definitely be out, their still being active does suggest that they could still be interested. They might not be, but it suggests that they still could be. If their interest ended 13 months ago, as you think, they would have been dissolved by now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 13 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: Of course it suggests something, if they were dissolved PIF would definitely be out, their still being active does suggest that they could still be interested. They might not be, but it suggests that they still could be. If their interest ended 13 months ago, as you think, they would have been dissolved by now. Again this is wrong. If either company either owes or was owed money to or from anyone pending the conclusion of the Ashley / PL cases or anything else then they'd just be left as they were. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 1 hour ago, Joey Linton said: Nah, people would still be able to see them even if they weren't active any more. There's no such thing as the "remnants hanging around" or not, they don't just disappear from public record altogether. https://www.gov.uk/strike-off-your-company-from-companies-register/apply-to-strike-off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beamish Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 48 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: Of course it suggests something, if they were dissolved PIF would definitely be out, their still being active does suggest that they could still be interested. They might not be, but it suggests that they still could be. If their interest ended 13 months ago, as you think, they would have been dissolved by now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: https://www.gov.uk/strike-off-your-company-from-companies-register/apply-to-strike-off Not sure what the point of that link is to the discussion we are having - even when they are struck off you can still see them in detail on the register for another 20 years. See here https://www.gov.uk/government/news/companies-house-direct-and-webcheck-services-to-close-later-in-2021 I looked it up when the deal first fell through to see what might happen. Also from the same site... "As part of our commitment to enhancing corporate transparency, we’ll continue to keep records of dissolved companies for 20 years from the date of dissolution. These records are currently available on other Companies House products for a fee." Edited September 3, 2021 by Joey Linton Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Joey Linton said: Not sure what the point of that link is to the discussion we are having - even when they are struck off you can still see them in detail on the register for another 20 years. See here https://www.gov.uk/government/news/companies-house-direct-and-webcheck-services-to-close-later-in-2021 I looked it up when the deal first fell through to see what might happen. Also from the same site... "As part of our commitment to enhancing corporate transparency, we’ll continue to keep records of dissolved companies for 20 years from the date of dissolution. These records are currently available on other Companies House products for a fee." But they're unlikely to want to keep the companies active, which involves filing annual accounts and confirmation statements, if they are just remnants of an embarrassing failure. Edited September 3, 2021 by Jackie Broon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 Yeap, I was told that mine would be struck off because of it being dormant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now