Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  On 27/01/2024 at 22:07, huss9 said:

so not with the team that played, then.

we would have been better with joelinton in the team but we didnt have him either.

Expand  

Being carved open is being carved open. This wasn't a steely, forbidding defensive display, it was a smash and grab, with unlikely goalscorers making up for our main attackers fumbling almost everything they touched.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 21:23, Weezertron said:

 

I think for the most part people are suggesting subs are made as a means to get ahead of fatigue and injury crisis. 

Expand  

 

I agree with this normally, but we had a two week break and looked even worse than when we were "fatigued". Seems more of a confidence thing, because as soon as we went 2-0 up, suddenly we were passing all around their press.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 22:13, 80 said:

Being carved open is being carved open. This wasn't a steely, forbidding defensive display, it was a smash and grab, with unlikely goalscorers making up for our main attackers fumbling almost everything they touched.

Expand  

Eh?

 

I watched a really scrappy game… one where both teams were poor… one where Fulham had 2/3 shots on goal all game… and where we took two chances that fell our way.

 

We didn’t play well with the ball, but defensively we were pretty good.

 

The midfield for me is the problem. A seeming lack of confidence / ability to keep the ball. Understandable considering the absentees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 22:33, Menace said:

They could have had 5 with 3 shots on goal

Expand  

 

Their problem wasn't just the shooting, they just had no one to attack the ball. There was one particular cross in the first half which I was worried our defenders might deflect it in even if their forwards were too timid to attack it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 22:33, Menace said:

They could have had 5 with 3 shots on goal

Expand  

They had 14 shots on goal? Not counting the fairly marginally offside goal and the ball whizzing across the face of our goal untouched by attackers or defenders several times. Maybe this is some strange new breed of defensive genius I'm not familiar with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 22:44, TRon said:

 

Their problem wasn't just the shooting, they just had no one to attack the ball. There was one particular cross in the first half which I was worried our defenders might deflect it in even if their forwards were too timid to attack it.

Expand  

Doesn't count mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 22:45, 80 said:

They had 14 shots on goal? Not counting the fairly marginally offside goal and the ball whizzing across the face of our goal untouched by attackers or defenders several times. Maybe this is some strange new breed of defensive genius I'm not familiar with.

Expand  

Yep, I thought it was as much to do with poor decision-making and a lack of composure from Fulham.  You can’t rely on that being the case every week. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 22:39, Shadow Puppets said:

Eh?

 

I watched a really scrappy game… one where both teams were poor… one where Fulham had 2/3 shots on goal all game… and where we took two chances that fell our way.

 

We didn’t play well with the ball, but defensively we were pretty good.

 

The midfield for me is the problem. A seeming lack of confidence / ability to keep the ball. Understandable considering the absentees.

Expand  

I can go along with most of that, but on balance of play I'd have to say they deserved the win. 3-1 to them would've been a perfectly understandable result. They had 2-3 shots on target, but it's deceiving if we ignore events like that shot they screwed wide towards the end when it looked easier to score.

 

Defensively we weren't awful, we weren't collapsing at all, and I wouldn't call the rest of the performance awful either, but going back to how this started, honestly I expected to win and put in a much more convincing display tonight, and that was very far from the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 22:56, The Prophet said:

Thought Fulham looked pretty toothless like.

Expand  

Crosses into the box and shots from distance from the ensuing scramble it looked like to me. Couple moments of miscommunication by us on a couple crosses even made one or two of them look more dangerous than they were. Only clear chance they made was when the game was long since won.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main issues arise when we drop deep and go into that flat 4-5-1 formation - it massively isolates our best player Isak for one thing but it also puts undue pressure on the defense. 
 

When we’re pressed up the pitch in the 4-3-3 we did last season and lose the ball in midfield our defense is at the halfway line and we have a much better chance of recycling possession. When we’re sat deep we’re fucked when we lose possession as it’s immediately in or around our box and we’re scrambling. 
 

We’re at our best in that true 4-3-3 pressuring up the pitch. When we drop into the flat 4-5-1 like we did today (and have many many times this season but didn’t last season) we play like garbage. 
 

 

 

 

Edited by cubaricho

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 22:45, 80 said:

They had 14 shots on goal? Not counting the fairly marginally offside goal and the ball whizzing across the face of our goal untouched by attackers or defenders several times. Maybe this is some strange new breed of defensive genius I'm not familiar with.

Expand  

they had 3 shots on goal, and 14 shots total. They rarely looked like they could produce anything other than speculative efforts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our midfield was overran all game and we banked on them not having quality in the final third. Play like that against Villa who are far superior to Fulham and we get ruined. 4-3-3 vs villa is sending the team to the slaughter 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 22:54, 80 said:

I can go along with most of that, but on balance of play I'd have to say they deserved the win. 3-1 to them would've been a perfectly understandable result. They had 2-3 shots on target, but it's deceiving if we ignore events like that shot they screwed wide towards the end when it looked easier to score.

 

Defensively we weren't awful, we weren't collapsing at all, and I wouldn't call the rest of the performance awful either, but going back to how this started, honestly I expected to win and put in a much more convincing display tonight, and that was very far from the case.

Expand  

It is crazy to suggest that a 3-1 to them is a perfectly understandable result. We were pretty shit for 60 minutes, but they were shit even when they dominated. They did not deserve to win at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 23:04, TRC said:

Our midfield was overran all game and we banked on them not having quality in the final third. Play like that against Villa who are far superior to Fulham and we get ruined. 4-3-3 vs villa is sending the team to the slaughter 

Expand  

They obviously identified our CM as an area of weakness, which any team with half a brain in charge will do. Only takes 10 minutes of watching us to realise how gaping the holes in our midfield are. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/01/2024 at 23:07, Vinny Green Balls said:

It is crazy to suggest that a 3-1 to them is a perfectly understandable result. We were pretty shit for 60 minutes, but they were shit even when they dominated. They did not deserve to win at all.

Expand  

They didn't deserve to win because they couldn't shoot for toffee. But they were underperforming versus the opportunities they were creating. I don't obsess over xG, but they beat us on it tonight, and that won't be counting all the times they failed to apply the final touch. In contrast, almost everything we did - which wasn't much for the first 75 minutes - broke down outside their area, apart from the two we scored, one of which resulted from a lucky deflection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...