Alexander Isak - C*nt (resting his glass bones so he can get properly injured at the world cup)

[Displayname]

4 minutes ago, duo said:

For Liverpool it's a win win - lowballing trying to get him on the cheap.  If not they've successfully unsettled our best player.  

Well they will ensure that no player in the future will be interested in grtting tapped up like this by them just to be left stranded.

So they got something to lose.

[Andy84]

Always suspected these either didn’t have the willing or the funds to meet our number. Using their paid shills to unsettle him to lowball us 

 

 

Edited August 30, 2025 by Andy84

[SAK]

Just now, gbandit said:

I’d say it’s backfired appallingly for them if he stays. We’re likely going to be sorted at CF and they desperately need a striker. If Ekitike were to pick up an injury they’re done. They also won’t stand a chance of getting him in future windows. This is their only chance now 

Which is why we shouldn’t sell and strengthen a rival. Hold out, let Isak sulk as long as we get in a second striker. There will be plenty’s of buyers in the winter market or next summer so long as it’s not the scouse cunts.

[Turnbull2000]

Looking forward to be told it's the 'Move Everybody Wantedto See' on Sky Sports News etc

[The Prophet]

Accepting £120 million would be pathetic.

 

If they don't back up the bluster of Liverpool meeting our valuation, it sets an awful precedent.

[Keegans Export]

8 minutes ago, duo said:

Arrogance of Liverpool - we must stand firm. We hold ALL the cards.

If they don't intend to pay "anywhere near £130m" that doesn't suggest an offer any higher than the £110m they started with 

 

 

Edited August 30, 2025 by Keegans Export

[Kid Icarus]

Don't intend to spend anywhere near £20m under the asking price. Fuck off man, this is pathetic.

[Gh0StFaC3]

3 minutes ago, gbandit said:

Not going to happen

Wish I shared your optimism.

[Displayname]

Even I will be pissed if we let him go for £120m, and I want him gone bad.

 

 

Edited August 30, 2025 by Displayname

[Andy84]

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

Don't intend to spend anywhere near £20m under the asking price. Fuck off man, this is pathetic.

The pedestal they’re held on is insane man

[Barnes23]

They may be leaking £120m now with a view to us eventually accepting £130m right before the deadline. Meeting them in the middle etc

 

Should tell them to get fucked either way

 

 

Edited August 30, 2025 by Barnes23

[SweMag]

45 minutes ago, Kaizero said:

 

To be fair to Romano, he's not a "bullshitter" per se. He gets paid a lot of money from both clubs and agents to use his social media platform and presence to force through the transfers the clubs/agents/players paying him wants him to make happen. He's an absolute cunt human being, granted, but not sure "bullshitter" is the right way to describe the smug cunt.

He got in contact with FC Copenhagen and told them he can write something about them on his Twitter if they paid him 10k.

[Sibierski]

Really hope they make a bid of £120m and it’s instantly rejected again by us. 
 

Really want to see Isak then rock up at Anfield pleading for them to pay more or whatever desperate shit is the last resort.

[Sibierski]

Signed Larsen for £65m, we’d actually have spent more than what we got for Isak and probably still need to sell next summer  

[JoeyBartoon]

I’ll be furious if the club lets him go for anything close to £120m — it would make us look weak and like we’ve completely caved in to player power.

[Stottie]

We don't have to accept any low bid.

 

PIF can also do a double hit by tapping up Mo Salah and ensuring no Saudi club pays a big fee for him next summer. Get him to stay the second year and leave on a free if necessary.

 

Liverpool do not hold all the cards.

[Pearljam10]

 

[1964]

We need to remember that Liverpool need another striker as much as we do

[Andy84]

Just now, Pearljam10 said:

 

[Optimistic Nut]

17 minutes ago, Pearljam10 said:

 

 

If they come back after a month with an offer of only £10m more than the original offer, I hope it's rejected as quickly as the first one.

[KetteringMag]

£100m+ deals take an absolute age to complete due to the money changing hands/legal stuff etc … it’s absolutely baffling they’ve not even been back in touch since the first bid … something isn’t right 

[Steve Charlton]

Keys saying on bein deal agreed 135.He was quoting Jan age of Swindon 

[Conjo]

Are you telling me that Jan Åge Fjørtoft just lied on TV saying a £130m deal has been agreed? 

 

[BottledDog]

Can't say I'm particularly fussed on the price as long as we come out with an exciting pair of replacement strikers to attack the Champions League with.

Ideally like to see him rot or loaned to Ajax, but not if it means we can't bring someone else in.

[Sibierski]

This whole transfer saga has been baffling from word go. But latest ‘theory’, Liverpool know we won’t budge on price (£130m+), and know Isak wants the move (and could try and force it further by transfer request), that they have leaked to press that no talks are happening and won’t go above £120m to force the last hand by Isak/his agent if they’re really desperate for move, and hope it then forces our hand to accept a lower offer.