Jump to content

Alexander Isak - International C*nt


Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

Even if we got silly money it still doesn't really make sense for us to allow him to move this summer and especially to a rival if we have any ambitions to progress ourselves. 

 

We proved last year that on our day we can beat Liverpool on the big occasion.

 

We allow him to move there, it basically ensures Liverpool likely stay top of the pile for the foreseeable. We lose the main thing that is helping us stay ahead of the rest of the pack of chasing clubs like Villa etc and we fall backwards. 

 

Not quite the same but it's abit like if Liverpool had sold Salah to Man City when they were ahead of Liverpool and winning all the league titles and because they could afford to offer more in wages and possibly more trophy success.

 

They would have said no chance at any cost because how are you supposed to close the gap and catch up to the teams above you if you give them your best players and increase that gap exponentially. 

 

Not to mention Salah will be off in a year or two and there's no guarantee they can replace him with equal quality so they will naturally be less of a force without him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, David Edgar said:

This is ramping up towards a sale. 

 

We'll say Liverpool shouldn't have made it public next. Then begrudgingly accept a bid because Isak was unsettled.

 

 

Jog on back to 2014 mate. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, RodneyCisse said:

Sky saying Liverpool considering a move for Rashford, reckon they’ve had the “fuck off cunts” from us?


Sounds like they’ve had it several times. 
 

Can’t see Rashford going there mind, bit of a step down from Wor Al. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, David Edgar said:

This is ramping up towards a sale. 

 

We'll say Liverpool shouldn't have made it public next. Then begrudgingly accept a bid because Isak was unsettled.


I don't think it is. Isak isn't for sale, and Liverpool's supposed valuation is of the kind of money which would perhaps get him if he was actively for sale. As things stand they're miles off, like £30 - £40m off, conservatively, even if Isak was keen.

It's like us offering £20-25m for Elanga and then playing like we're the big boys in the press.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Infinitely Content said:


I don't think it is. Isak isn't for sale, and Liverpool's supposed valuation is of the kind of money which would perhaps get him if he was actively for sale. As things stand they're miles off, like £30 - £40m off, conservatively, even if Isak was keen.

It's like us offering £20-25m for Elanga and then playing like we're the big boys in the press.

Ah the Mike Ashley approach.

 

Severely underbid followed by "Well we tried but couldn't get get x player over the line..."

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the reports around Mitchell vetoing a new contract for Isak are correct then it's an easy fix.

 

In negotiations stress it was Mitchell, he's no longer here and give Isak a signing bonus on his new contract equal to the backdated pay increase from when we were last in negotiations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Andy84 said:

We’ll be sorting out terms for Isak quickly. But also think we need to say we won’t stand in his way forever. But he needs to stay this season which is huge for the club 


If his way is going to Liverpool then we absolutely will stand in his way. 
 

I want him to get a new deal soon but it doesn’t need to be now. He has plenty left. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...