Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[Smal]

the very concept of Joelinton calming anyone down has me creased, like

[Ronson333]

[Elliottman]

2 hours ago, aussiemag said:

We needed to sell Willock earlier in the window and replace him. Then Ramsey replaces Willock and we get a Tonali type to replace Longstaff. 

 

It'll happen, next couple of windows we can pick up some purples now squad is sorted. 

[KennyUtd]

7 minutes ago, El Prontonise said:

I assume emre as he was a racist?

Aye, but that goal against Sunderland though. 😆

[Fak]

4 hours ago, SUPERTOON said:

Apologies if already posted:

 

 

 

[Kid Icarus]

If true, I would imagine it's Bruno calming Joelinton down. The thought of Joelinton calming someone down is hilarious

[r0cafella]

1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said:

If true, I would imagine it's Bruno calming Joelinton down. The thought of Joelinton calming someone down is hilarious

Should have them him have at it, recorded it and put it on ppv. A nice psr boon it would have been. 

[Benwell Lad]

Terry McDermott did everything he could to force a transfer to Liverpool after the cup final in 1974 even to the point he was visibly not trying on the pitch.

Despicable really but he was a Liverpool lad and fan.

When he eventually returned to Newcastle he was treat like a hero. Short memories.

[kingxlnc]

There seems to be a pattern of all the ones we hate most have got a deep link to Liverpool somewhere, not including the Ashley era

 

Souness Owen Isak Dalglish as the four big ones that stand out

Barton is from Liverpool even if he never played for them 

Rush Enrique Hamann as minor ones

 

if you add Ashley era

then Bruce is a must. The worst of the worst as well as Ashley of course. 
 

ironically though some of the biggest legends of the club are also Liverpool linked, Keegan, Beardsley, Benitez

 

[AyeDubbleYoo]

10 minutes ago, Benwell Lad said:

Terry McDermott did everything he could to force a transfer to Liverpool after the cup final in 1974 even to the point he was visibly not trying on the pitch.

Despicable really but he was a Liverpool lad and fan.

When he eventually returned to Newcastle he was treat like a hero. Short memories.

Hopefully we’ll always remember to abuse Isak to the greatest extent possible. 

[Fak]

Honestly these bin dipping rats need a serious knocking down a peg or two.

 

 

 

 

 

[andycap]

1 minute ago, kingxlnc said:

There seems to be a pattern of all the ones we hate most have got a deep link to Liverpool somewhere, not including the Ashley era

 

Souness Owen Isak Dalglish as the four big ones that stand out

Barton is from Liverpool even if he never played for them 

Rush Enrique Hamann as minor ones

 

if you add Ashley era

then Bruce is a must. The worst of the worst as well as Ashley of course. 
 

ironically though some of the biggest legends of the club are also Liverpool linked, Keegan, Beardsley, Benitez

 

I never hated Dalglish mind. 

[andycap]

1 minute ago, Fak said:

Honestly these bin dipping rats need a serious knocking down a peg or two.

 

 

 

 

 

That first fella abdi talks shite. 

[Moose]

1 minute ago, kingxlnc said:

There seems to be a pattern of all the ones we hate most have got a deep link to Liverpool somewhere, not including the Ashley era

 

Souness Owen Isak Dalglish as the four big ones that stand out

Barton is from Liverpool even if he never played for them 

Rush Enrique Hamann as minor ones

 

if you add Ashley era

then Bruce is a must. The worst of the worst as well as Ashley of course. 
 

ironically though some of the biggest legends of the club are also Liverpool linked, Keegan, Beardsley, Benitez

 

 

Throw in the Carroll saga, the 4-3 and all the last minute sucker punches they've landed on us in recent years and it feels like these cunts have a hex over us.

 

God knows what pact with the devil we signed just to win the LC this year

[AyeDubbleYoo]

It’s nonsense to me that Liverpool outplayed or bullied us or have come out of this winners is some profound way. 
 

They have more money because of the rules, we had a player with no professional standards who was prepared to make himself worthless to us in order to secure more money for himself. Even prepared to cost us millions by not qualifying for the CL.
 

Liverpool are prepared to ignore this because it benefits them, that’s all. We have to sell because we can’t write off £100m+ and we can’t risk having a non-striker. 
 

Both clubs did what they had to do, Liverpool and Isak’s was just morally much worse. That’s it. 

[r0cafella]

1 minute ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

It’s nonsense to me that Liverpool outplayed or bullied us or have come out of this winners is some profound way. 
 

They have more money because of the rules, we had a player with no professional standards who was prepared to make himself worthless to us in order to secure more money for himself. Even prepared to cost us millions by not qualifying for the CL.
 

Liverpool are prepared to ignore this because it benefits them, that’s all. We have to sell because we can’t write off £100m+ and we can’t risk having a non-striker. 
 

Both clubs did what they had to do, Liverpool and Isak’s was just morally much worse. That’s it. 

They did, they absolutely schooled us. But if you believe otherwise it's all good. 

[Kid Icarus]

Newcastle had a very public stance that they chose to back down on and we can presume Liverpool, Isak and his agent knew we would back down on. We can argue about why that happened, what it means, and who it benefits, but right now that's it in a nutshell and it's no mystery why you would deem that as Newcastle being the ones that were bullied and outplayed - I certainly see it that way and I have every reason not to. 

 

 

Edited September 2, 2025 by Kid Icarus

[TRon]

4 minutes ago, andycap said:

That first fella abdi talks shite. 

 

I'm reading plenty of similar guff from sportswriters though. That Liverpool won the transfer window and are virtually unstoppable now. Doesn't help that they scored late winners against us and Arsenal either giving them 9 points instead of 5. 

[Fak]

2 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

I'm reading plenty of similar guff from sportswriters though. That Liverpool won the transfer window and are virtually unstoppable now. Doesn't help that they scored late winners against us and Arsenal either giving them 9 points instead of 5. 

 

And Bournemouth. 

 

They've been very average thus far.

[Turnbull2000]

5 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

It’s nonsense to me that Liverpool outplayed or bullied us or have come out of this winners is some profound way. 

 

 

Can't agree with that like. Other than the League Cup, they've bossed us for years and continue to do so. They've now got potentially one of the strongest teams the PL has ever seen. Anything less than a PL and CL double would be disappointing for them.

 

 

Edited September 2, 2025 by Turnbull2000

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

Newcastle had a very public stance that they chose to back down on and we can presume Liverpool, Isak and his agent knew we would back down on. We can argue about why that happened, what it means, and who it benefits, but right now that's it in a nutshell. 

Yeah, but I mean everything said at every stage is theatre. Would we have ‘won’ if we didn’t sell Isak and he just sat around for a year while we had a shit season? 

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Just now, Turnbull2000 said:

 

Can't agree with that like. Other than the League Cup, they've bossed us for years and continue to do so. They've now got potentially one of the strongest teams the PL has ever seen. Any less than a PL and CL double would be disappointing for them.

Yeah, I was referring just to the Isak saga

[Kid Icarus]

4 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

Yeah, but I mean everything said at every stage is theatre. Would we have ‘won’ if we didn’t sell Isak and he just sat around for a year while we had a shit season? 

 

We've done this to death, but the outcome is basically pick your own adventure. I don't believe for a second that Isak staying automatically would have meant this, that, or the other. My stance is and will likely always be that there were much more historical examples that favoured us holding firm than not - not because I wanted him to stay, but because I wanted the club to be strong, stick to its word, not set what I consider a clear precedent, and to not strengthen a domestic rival - and others will disagree.

 

 

Edited September 2, 2025 by Kid Icarus

[AyeDubbleYoo]

1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said:

 

We've done this to death, but the outcome is basically pick your own adventure. I don't believe for a second that Isak staying automatically would have meant this, that, or the other. My stance is and will likely always be that there were much more historical examples that favoured us holding firm than not, and others will disagree.

Fair enough, my point was just that I don’t believe any merit can be attached to what Liverpool have done here. And our decision to eventually sell was perfectly logical. 

[Choppy Chop Chop]

Just hope I never see the video where ratty speaks in a thick overdone scouse accent, It'll be vomit inducing 

 

 

Edited September 2, 2025 by Choppy Chop Chop
gramma