Conjo Posted November 13 Share Posted November 13 3 hours ago, Roids said: Rice a technically limited DM went for 100m+ Caceido went for 100m+ A known to be garbage Havertz went for 65m+ Anthony 70m+ Hoiberg 70m+ None but one of the aforementioned are strikers. Selling for anything less than 110m (bar being last year of his contract or similar) would be negligence by the club. The striker market is dire, I personally wouldn't respond at anything under 120m So what you're saying is that if we were to sell Isak, we'd be best off finanically selling him to Man Utd? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted November 14 Share Posted November 14 Not like selling a world class striker to man u has ever bit us in the past like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted November 14 Share Posted November 14 🗣️ Alexander Isak responding to speculation over his future: “Throughout my career, I have never talked about or really commented on the move rumours during the season. There have been many such years where it has been talked about. It doesn’t affect me. I am commenting on my situation in Newcastle, and I have never had any problem there. I am fully focused on my task there and that we will have a fantastic season. There are still great opportunities for that. I have no thoughts about anything else.” Isak on a potential breakdown in contract talks: “The only thing I can say is that a lot of information and rumours often come out. Much of what I read is not true. So that’s about all I can say about the whole thing.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanji Posted November 14 Share Posted November 14 My dog ain’t going no where Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Checko Posted November 14 Share Posted November 14 Top players are always going to get linked to other clubs. Top players during contract negotiations doubly so. He's got plenty of time left on his contract so I'd imagine this'll get done, but maybe with something like a release clause if we're not in Europe/Champions league by x year. That sort of thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted November 14 Share Posted November 14 16 hours ago, Pata said: Havertz is so underrated now based on these posts. He's not amazing but he's nowhere near flop or garbage status. His size, strength and technical ability are rare in the same package and he's so versatile too. Yeh his fee is just about correct. But Isak is a level better and the fee should reflect that. Kolo Muani went for £80m last year too. Off the back of a single 15 goal season in the Bundesliga and a good World Cup. These are al good players in my book. But if Isak puts another 20-goal season up, any selling fee next summer needs to reflect he’s a level above and a surer-bet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted November 14 Share Posted November 14 21 hours ago, Pata said: Havertz is so underrated now based on these posts. He's not amazing but he's nowhere near flop or garbage status. His size, strength and technical ability are rare in the same package and he's so versatile too. Flop was not really the correct term to use for Havertz or Jackson, never really put that much thought into it. They are decent players, but would Chelsea or Arsenal like to replace them with Isak if they had the chance? I would say yes. Both clubs have been linked with Isak, so I imagine they would consider him an upgrade. The type of elite striker that turns title challenges into title wins. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roids Posted Friday at 09:45 Share Posted Friday at 09:45 Havertz' average as hell, a flop at £70m & £270k p/w. Jackson is a relative bargain at £25m (and the better player of the two). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geogaddi Posted Friday at 12:32 Share Posted Friday at 12:32 (edited) 80 million would be daylight robbery for Isak mind and thankfully the club will know this . His contract length and how unique he is along with how rare a world class centre forward that can score 20+ premier league goals a season means anything less than 100 million and we shouldn't even be picking up the phone . That Højlund for example cost 64 million and if that's the going rate for an average young striker then Isak is worth at least 120 million. Edited Friday at 12:38 by Geogaddi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted Friday at 12:43 Share Posted Friday at 12:43 2 hours ago, Roids said: Havertz' average as hell, a flop at £70m & £270k p/w. Jackson is a relative bargain at £25m (and the better player of the two). Wtf Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted Saturday at 21:01 Share Posted Saturday at 21:01 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted Saturday at 21:03 Share Posted Saturday at 21:03 lethal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted Saturday at 21:08 Share Posted Saturday at 21:08 4 minutes ago, Holloway said: lethal Lethal is right. So fucking sharp and God knows how he generates the power he does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted Saturday at 21:14 Share Posted Saturday at 21:14 4 minutes ago, Yorkie said: Lethal is right. So fucking sharp and God knows how he generates the power he does. He’s probably a better all round player than Haaland, but some on here think he’s worth only £80m. The lad is a superstar. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted Saturday at 21:14 Share Posted Saturday at 21:14 He's been total class this game Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted Saturday at 21:24 Share Posted Saturday at 21:24 9 minutes ago, Ronson333 said: He’s probably a better all round player than Haaland, but some on here think he’s worth only £80m. The lad is a superstar. Who? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted Saturday at 21:26 Share Posted Saturday at 21:26 He's worth £81m. Howay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted Saturday at 21:33 Share Posted Saturday at 21:33 15 minutes ago, Ronson333 said: but some on here think he’s worth only £80m. Not seen one person in here who thinks that. But if you search up the trolls on different fan bases, they will say anything between 40-60m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted Saturday at 21:40 Share Posted Saturday at 21:40 Someone a few pages back suggested £80m would be a decent fee. It was only one person mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted Saturday at 21:41 Share Posted Saturday at 21:41 Imagine getting Isak for £40m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted Saturday at 22:08 Share Posted Saturday at 22:08 22 minutes ago, The College Dropout said: Someone a few pages back suggested £80m would be a decent fee. It was only one person mind. Nobody said this. I said £80m "wasn't an insult," because it isn't; no one is insulting anyone by putting 80 million quid on the table. It matches the most anyone in this league has ever paid for a striker excluding the Blue lunatics. And I said £17m was a decent profit, which it is, thanks to the backwards world of PSR. How many clubs have turned a profit on an investment that big? However, it's possible to think all of the above whilst also being absolutely certain that we shouldn't (and wouldn't) blink at such an offer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted Saturday at 22:19 Share Posted Saturday at 22:19 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Yorkie said: Nobody said this. I said £80m "wasn't an insult," because it isn't; no one is insulting anyone by putting 80 million quid on the table. It matches the most anyone in this league has ever paid for a striker excluding the Blue lunatics. And I said £17m was a decent profit, which it is, thanks to the backwards world of PSR. How many clubs have turned a profit on an investment that big? However, it's possible to think all of the above whilst also being absolutely certain that we shouldn't (and wouldn't) blink at such an offer. Conjo said this a few pages back, so you may want to double check. And you said ‘£17m was a decent profit’, absolute bollocks on one of the world’s best strikers. Edited Saturday at 22:21 by Ronson333 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted Saturday at 22:21 Share Posted Saturday at 22:21 Sweden have some front line mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted Saturday at 22:27 Share Posted Saturday at 22:27 3 minutes ago, Ronson333 said: Conjo said this a few pages back, so you may want to double check. And you said ‘£17m was a decent profit’, absolute bollocks on one of the world’s best strikers. I can't find it; can you quote it? Re the profit; if we'd bought him for £20million I'd agree with you. The underlying point to my whole argument since Bailey printed his garbage is that £100m+ just isn't gonna be a thing we see a lot of because I believe the market is 'deflating.' Isak is potentially an exception, and my first post on the matter was that we should be looking for £90-100m. (In the unlikely scenario of him departing) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted Saturday at 22:52 Share Posted Saturday at 22:52 33 minutes ago, Ronson333 said: Conjo said this a few pages back, so you may want to double check. And you said ‘£17m was a decent profit’, absolute bollocks on one of the world’s best strikers. On 13/11/2024 at 11:33, Conjo said: Nobody is saying £80m is a good fee. We're just speculating that we might not be able to get as much for him as many think we should under certain circumstances in a hypothetical scenario Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now