r0cafella Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 6 minutes ago, KetsbaiaIsBald said: The budget was 8m. They’ve spent 45m. So each club will have nearly 2m less income. It would be amusing if this 2m put all 20 clubs into breach of the financial regulations and all 20 appealed… They would literally be eating themselves, hilariously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 15 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: COME ON CITEH! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 For all the hearing was confidential, if there was going to have to be a change in the rules (i.e. if the PL lost some or part of the argument) they'd have to inform the member clubs and it's inevitable at least one of those clubs will leak it. If the PL "won" then I suppose they could still call a meeting to report that to the clubs but they presumably wouldn't have to as it'd just be business as usual? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 (edited) 9 hours ago, r0cafella said: It’s such an impeccable racket. I was thinking spot forest and how they got done, it’s really bizarre promoted clubs have less FFP leeway when promoted, how to be anything but a yo-yo club in such situations? The incumbent advantage is monumental and it’s why most of the clubs love these rules you are basically protected from competition weather your a cartel club or an established mid table club. Didn't the American owners club want rid of promotion/relegation ? They almost have it. Edited September 26 by madras Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 (edited) 3 hours ago, Keegans Export said: For all the hearing was confidential, if there was going to have to be a change in the rules (i.e. if the PL lost some or part of the argument) they'd have to inform the member clubs and it's inevitable at least one of those clubs will leak it. If the PL "won" then I suppose they could still call a meeting to report that to the clubs but they presumably wouldn't have to as it'd just be business as usual? Yeah, that's how I read it too. A meeting is much more likely to indicate Man City have won and the rules need to be changed, which can only be done with the agreement of the clubs, otherwise it would just be business as usual. Edited September 26 by Jackie Broon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 14 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: Yeah, that's how I read it too. A meeting is much more likely to indicate Man City have won and the rules need to be changed, which can only be done with the agreement of the clubs, otherwise it would just be business as usual. So what happens if City win and PL need to change some rules. But the other clubs won't vote to change those rules? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 7 minutes ago, Adam said: So what happens if City win and PL need to change some rules. But the other clubs won't vote to change those rules? Affected clubs, like Man City and us, would probably be able to apply for an injunction or something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 2 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: Affected clubs, like Man City and us, would probably be able to apply for an injunction or something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 1 hour ago, Jackie Broon said: Yeah, that's how I read it too. A meeting is much more likely to indicate Man City have won and the rules need to be changed, which can only be done with the agreement of the clubs, otherwise it would just be business as usual. This is a regularly scheduled shareholder meeting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetsbaiaIsBald Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 6 minutes ago, timeEd32 said: This is a regularly scheduled shareholder meeting. I recon all the rumours about this week was someone taking a guess that we’d hear something due to the scheduled meeting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Just now, KetsbaiaIsBald said: I recon all the rumours about this week was someone taking a guess that we’d hear something due to the scheduled meeting. Yeah, just saying the fact there’s a meeting doesn’t tell us anything about the outcome. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 17 minutes ago, timeEd32 said: Yeah, just saying the fact there’s a meeting doesn’t tell us anything about the outcome. That's right, however if the Premier League are going to have to change their rules on APTs then that has to be relayed to the other clubs and that will leak out pretty quickly. If it doesn't then we can assume either the result of the arbitration hasn't been decided yet or the rules are staying as they are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Just now, Fak said: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 3 minutes ago, Fak said: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWMag Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Cartel furiously scurrying about to change the rules. Cuckold Parish doing his Masters’ bidding in trying to line up the 10 usual PL sacrificial lambs to vote it through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy84 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 If there is a victory for City surely there can’t be a rule that supersedes this ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 1 minute ago, Andy84 said: If there is a victory for City surely there can’t be a rule that supersedes this ? They’ll try and this is the part us, Villa and City need to steam in to shut them down. Any attempt to try and re-handcuff teams looks beyond suspect and collusion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Can’t wait to have a piss in the new St James Park toilets sponsored by Sela. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokerprince2004 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Yes! Brilliant news for toon that. PL is corrupt as fuck and city had the balls to take them on and handed their arse back to them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetsbaiaIsBald Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 10 minutes ago, Fak said: are owners will be shitting it. No financial rules to hide behind 😈 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 I guess now we get to see if PIF have lost interest in us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now