Monters Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 3 hours ago, Ben said: With regards to the parachute payments if a promoted team stays up doesnt their parachute money get split between the rest of the championship clubs ? or have I just totally made that up ? Doubtful as each relegated team will get the parachute payments... I do have a vague memory of the payments diminishing over 3 seasons and if you are promoted back within that time frame then the remaining monies is shared to the other championship clubs but could be very wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWMag Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 I have read recently that the money ‘saved’ from parachute payments is split between the PL clubs, but not sure if accurate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 41 minutes ago, NWMag said: I have read recently that the money ‘saved’ from parachute payments is split between the PL clubs, but not sure if accurate It’ll just about cover the PL’s legal bills. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 6 English teams in the CL and possibly winning two of the 3 tournaments is going to shine a light on how financially dominant the PL has become. Not really sure what can be done. It would be a shame if UEFA responded by making an example out of a club like Chelsea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 On 01/05/2025 at 17:00, NWMag said: I have read recently that the money ‘saved’ from parachute payments is split between the PL clubs, but not sure if accurate It is as far as I know - I think it shorts be split between championship personally but I read somewhere that it’s seen as still belonging to the premier league. Something I disagree with as if I give you a tenner I can’t say it’s still mine until you spend it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafalove Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 (edited) Type of thing we could/should do? Edited May 4 by Rafalove Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 On 02/05/2025 at 12:25, timeEd32 said: 6 English teams in the CL and possibly winning two of the 3 tournaments is going to shine a light on how financially dominant the PL has become. Not really sure what can be done. It would be a shame if UEFA responded by making an example out of a club like Chelsea. It’s the system working as intended. The entire big 6 is meant to qualify. The rule changes will mean Chelsea (might) get in via 5th. Spurs/Man U get in via Europa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 17 minutes ago, Rafalove said: Type of thing we could/should do? Why will this blow PSR right open? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamPS Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 1 minute ago, r0cafella said: Why will this blow PSR right open? I am guessing they’ve spotted capital spend is outside scope. So they think they can buy a load of houses (capital) and rent them for income and remove any PSR limits. Maybe if this ludicrous plan works PIF could sell NUFC a few oil wells and we’re laughing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 2 minutes ago, WilliamPS said: I am guessing they’ve spotted capital spend is outside scope. So they think they can buy a load of houses (capital) and rent them for income and remove any PSR limits. Maybe if this ludicrous plan works PIF could sell NUFC a few oil wells and we’re laughing I'm pretty sure DAMAC are just licensing the brand, these units will also be sold not rented if I'm not mistaken. It's a nothing burger, plus they've already blown ffp/par apart with selling the womens team, hotels, car parks as well as trading academy players for profit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 14 hours ago, Rafalove said: Type of thing we could/should do? 13 hours ago, WilliamPS said: I am guessing they’ve spotted capital spend is outside scope. So they think they can buy a load of houses (capital) and rent them for income and remove any PSR limits. Maybe if this ludicrous plan works PIF could sell NUFC a few oil wells and we’re laughing Don't know if the last three years has passed everyone by, but PIF won't do anything like this. They've shown no inclination to test the rules on any level - and there is a good chance that they agreed not to do this in order to get the takeover approved. Complete non-starter - the loophole will end up getting closed in any case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 DAMAC are absolutely huge as well, why would they want to ruin their rep for some Chelsea nonsense? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 16 minutes ago, Menace said: DAMAC are absolutely huge as well, why would they want to ruin their rep for some Chelsea nonsense? it's just a licensing deal where they use the Chelsea brand on apartments. why? who knows but that's all it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
janpawel Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 How does the income compare between winning the Europa league, and say being knocked out at the quarter finals of the champions league? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 5 hours ago, janpawel said: How does the income compare between winning the Europa league, and say being knocked out at the quarter finals of the champions league? Villa made £45m in prize money - the Europa League earns a maximum of £20m in prize money (assuming winning every group game) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted Monday at 18:46 Share Posted Monday at 18:46 Does this look pretty accurate? Just shows the job we're doing as a club. Amazing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted Thursday at 06:33 Share Posted Thursday at 06:33 Makes it slightly harder to argue with the £200m valuation when someone external takes 10% at that price. Fuckers. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cn05x60p8dro Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
500bhp Posted Thursday at 06:48 Share Posted Thursday at 06:48 13 minutes ago, Nucasol said: Makes it slightly harder to argue with the £200m valuation when someone external takes 10% at that price. Fuckers. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cn05x60p8dro A favour for one of his American mates who owns Chelsea? £20m is peanuts to him but helps his mates justify the £200m valuation, just a thought! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Edgar Posted Thursday at 06:50 Share Posted Thursday at 06:50 Oh yeah, it'll be dodgy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted Thursday at 06:51 Share Posted Thursday at 06:51 Just now, David Edgar said: Oh yeah, it'll be dodgy. Screams “you invest in ours, we’ll invest equivalent in yours” grift to inflate valuations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago PSR works, geed up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 36 minutes ago, Ben said: PSR works, geed up. And apparently so does stealing the pension money from supporters to set up a company to buy their football club, get them promoted to the Premier League, never give the money back, and then win the FA Cup, get into Europe, and then sell the club to an American billionaire who’s company owns half the domestic product brands in the world. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Stifler said: And apparently so does stealing the pension money from supporters to set up a company to buy their football club, get them promoted to the Premier League, never give the money back, and then win the FA Cup, get into Europe, and then sell the club to an American billionaire who’s company owns half the domestic product brands in the world. Nee idea what that means Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 18 minutes ago, Ben said: Nee idea what that means Steve Parish got Palace supporters to transfer their pensions into a trust so that he could have a deposit to buy Crystal Palace which he and his friends had placed into administration. Apparently Palace and the then owner Simon Jordon had a line of credit or commercial deal with one of Parish’s companies, and Parish claimed that the money wasn’t paid and Simon Jordon disputed it, but it was costing the club too much money and he had to place them into administration. So Parish got the pension money from Palace fans to save the club that he effectively forced into admiration. Once in as owner, he turned his back on the deal to give the Palace fans a share of the club which would have resulted in them getting their pension money back if they cashed it in. Parish is now selling the club to the New York Jets owner, who is the owner of the Johnson Johnson group. The Johnson Johnson group make something stupid like 50% of the domestic goods market in American and Europe. They also sold talc which is poured onto babies after bath when the company knew it caused cancer. They paid researchers to dispute the claims, but various studies exposed the truth. They then paid the USA government to stop them from holding them accountable for it and paying compensation. Talc has only very recently went off the shelf. Edited 11 hours ago by Stifler Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Stifler said: Steve Parish got Palace supporters to transfer their pensions into a trust so that he could have a deposit to buy Crystal Palace which he and his friends had placed into administration. Apparently Palace and the then owner Simon Jordon had a line of credit or commercial deal with one of Parish’s companies, and Parish claimed that the money wasn’t paid and Simon Jordon disputed it, but it was costing the club too much money and he had to place them into administration. So Parish got the pension money from Palace fans to save the club that he effectively forced into admiration. Once in he turned his back on the deal to give the Palace fans a share of the club which would have resulted in them getting their pension money back if they cashed it in. Parish is now selling the club to the New York Jets owner, who is the owner of the Johnson Johnson group. The Johnson Johnson group make something stupid like 50% of the domestic goods market in American and Europe. They also sold talc which is poured onto babies after bath when the company knew it caused cancer. They paid researchers to dispute the claims, but various studies exposed the truth. They then paid the USA government to stop them from holding them accountable for it and paying compensation. Talc has only very recently went off the shelf. Arh, so thats why Simon Jordon hates Parish Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now