Jump to content

Financial Fair Play / Profit & Sustainability


Mattoon

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Keegans Export said:

Wow, that's a big shock. Unless they're bringing it in in addition to the 70/85% rule?

 

So how is that going to work?

 

You can spend 5 times what the bottom club earn but only 75% of your turnover? It doesn't make sense!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jack27 said:

They are

 

1 minute ago, GeordieT said:


There has to be concurrency with UEFA as I’ve understood it. 

 

In that case it makes very little difference to our spending power, seeing as 70% of our turnover is going to be nowhere near enough to spend £450m.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scoot said:

 

So how is that going to work?

 

You can spend 5 times what the bottom club earn but only 75% of your turnover? It doesn't make sense!

Presumably it's either 5x what the bottom club earn or 70/85% of turnover, whichever is lower.

 

I've seen the argument that it at least caps what the big earners can spend, but by Kieran Maguire's calculations there's only Chelsea and maybe Man City spending above this 5x cap now, so I don't see it making any fundamental difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Keegans Export said:

 

 

In that case it makes very little difference to our spending power, seeing as 70% of our turnover is going to be nowhere near enough to spend £450m.

 

That's what I mean, it's impossible to have both. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's a little unclear if it's as well as or in place of. At first I thought it was as well as, but a few places seem to think it's in place of it. Such as Kieran Maguire. Obviously there are the UEFA rules as well which would need to be complied with when in Europe, but the punishment on those seems less of a deterant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same shit different name then basically. What’s the point of the cap then basically. 

 

 

Edited by Ikon

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scoot said:

 

So how is that going to work?

 

You can spend 5 times what the bottom club earn but only 75% of your turnover? It doesn't make sense!

85%, 70% is the UEFA rule.

 

And yes, the two go together.

 

So, we could spend 5 times that of the bottom clubs, but only up to 85% of our turnover. 

 

Which means, we couldn't spend 5 times that at all, but all the big boys still could as their revenue is so much greater than everyone else's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scoot said:

 

That's what I mean, it's impossible to have both. 

It's not impossible to have both, it just means that the clubs with turnover of over £640m will have their spending capped at £450m whereas clubs with turnover below that amount will have their spending capped at 70%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Dr.Spaceman said:

Hang on, we voted for it though, that's got to mean something, right?

Yes because it stops the mega clubs running away into the distance. It limits how far ahead they can get. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

Will be interesting to see just how much the 3rd party rules are relaxed to go alongside this. 

What’s the source for this relaxing or related party stuff?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said:

Will be interesting to see just how much the 3rd party rules are relaxed to go alongside this. 

Narrator: they won’t be relaxed 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Yes because it stops the mega clubs running away into the distance. It limits how far ahead they can get. 

 

As long as they can get ahead far enough not to be threatened beyond the odd season or two of freak results, I doubt they'll lose any sleep over it. Just seems like a token pretence of fair play without actually roping the cartel clubs in any meaningful way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if now that they have 2 limits, that will be where you start moving into points deduction territory, break one of the 70% of turn over or hard cap and it’s just a fine, break both and it’s a heavy points deduction 

 

 

Edited by nufcnick

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nufcnick said:

I wonder if now that they have 2 limits, that will be where you start moving into points deduction territory, break one of the 70% of turn over or hard cap and it’s just a fine, break both and it’s a heavy points deduction 

 

 

 

 

Surely one is related to Euro comps only, the PL won't act on that breach, will they? You'll just be denied entry to any Euro competition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

What’s the source for this relaxing or related party stuff?

 

The regs themselves apparently. The bottom section: It ALSO opens up the opportunity for EPL to relax related-party deals... as hard cap x4.5/5 times of central broadcast revenues distribution creates an upper limit that doesn't stop investment, just market-distorting investments.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Yes because it stops the mega clubs running away into the distance. It limits how far ahead they can get. 

Which, in turn, gives us a bargaining chip of sorts.

 

Think I read something that these rules on multiples are, magically, exactly about the amount Man City currently overspend compared to the bottom club now.

 

Be funny if an absolutely potless club gets promoted in future, maths fans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How far does the related party stuff go? Lets say PIF bought Adidas, would our sponsorship deal with them then be limited or scrutinised more? We just need to get the club tractor sponsor, official face cream, club gravy etc to get around all this nonsense. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Keegans Export said:

Presumably it's either 5x what the bottom club earn or 70/85% of turnover, whichever is lower.

 

I've seen the argument that it at least caps what the big earners can spend, but by Kieran Maguire's calculations there's only Chelsea and maybe Man City spending above this 5x cap now, so I don't see it making any fundamental difference.

 

Man United? They have the biggest income out of them all, don't they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...