TRon Posted November 21 Share Posted November 21 4 hours ago, timeEd32 said: The sad fact is that it is far more important to be in the Premier League than to win it. Somewhat sobering to see it so starkly how many clubs run the Mike Ashley economic model. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted November 21 Share Posted November 21 7 hours ago, TRon said: Hopefully a bit less naive since the heady days of our takeover. Then: Now: Sorry...not sure how you mean? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 21 Share Posted November 21 1 minute ago, Heron said: Sorry...not sure how you mean? I'm clueless to what his/her point is also. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 (edited) https://x.com/david_ornstein/status/1859891717140574526?s=46 Premier League APT changes approved at shareholders meeting Edited November 22 by gdm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Just now, gdm said: https://x.com/david_ornstein/status/1859891717140574526?s=46 How predictable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy84 Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Ensure the competitive balance of the league, cartel just trolling now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weznufc Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 2 minutes ago, gdm said: https://x.com/david_ornstein/status/1859891717140574526?s=46 Premier League APT changes approved at shareholders meeting So this doesn't help us at all then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 City going back to court then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Just now, gdm said: City going back to court then? Possibly but of course if the PL and it's new rules are legally compliant then nothing is to be done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Then when the panel explains its verdict in more detail in a few weeks, the new rules could be deemed unlawful again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Wonder which way we voted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Man City have failed to win the league once since 17/18, but let's worry about Newcastle potentially doing a Portsmouth. Why are more people not going nuclear over this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 It’s kind of irrelevant anyways, they may be demeed unlawful in a few weeks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Only 4 clubs voted against it, City and Villa two of the four. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 6 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: It’s kind of irrelevant anyways, they may be demeed unlawful in a few weeks. Exactly. It's a war of loopholes and existing precedents at this point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 4 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: Only 4 clubs voted against it, City and Villa two of the four. So no abstentions? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 1 minute ago, r0cafella said: So no abstentions? Apparently not no. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieT Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 (edited) Manchester City, Aston Villa, Newcastle United and Nottingham Forest were the only clubs to vote against the proposed alterations according to the Athletic. Edited November 22 by GeordieT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 (edited) 1 minute ago, GeordieT said: Manchester City, Aston Villa, Newcastle United and Nottingham Forest were the only clubs to vote against the proposed alterations. Yeah this makes perfect sense 3 clubs outside of city with ambition to be more than these rules allow. If I have any low blood pressure I'll get myself over to reddit and read the red top fans gloat about how just these rules are. Edited November 22 by r0cafella Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheikBoom Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 So 16 clubs voted to essentially protect the top 6 and their advantage? Wonderful. Says a lot about the other clubs as well. You’re almost protecting yourself from relegation & the need to invest. Got to keep on the gravy train. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 1 minute ago, CheikBoom said: So 16 clubs voted to essentially protect the top 6 and their advantage? Wonderful. Says a lot about the other clubs as well. You’re almost protecting yourself from relegation & the need to invest. Got to keep on the gravy train. 16 clubs voted for the status quo because they benefit from it. Most clubs aren't ambitious to the point of challenging the elite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CallumG6 Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Times like this I wish the Super League came off and those at the top fucked off for good, whilst leaving the rest of us to it. It's been said before, but the game itself has been circling the drain for years and has fallen victim (like most of society) to profits uber alice. I'm normally an optimist but struggle when it comes to football. Fuck the other 16 for playing their role in continuing the status quo, beggars belief! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Getting voted over by cuck clubs who have no place being in the top tier at all historically. Brighton, Brentford, Crystal Palace, Fulham and Bournemouth. Put those teams in the north and they wouldn't be anywhere higher than the Championship playoffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Just now, CallumG6 said: Times like this I wish the Super League came off and those at the top fucked off for good, whilst leaving the rest of us to it. It's been said before, but the game itself has been circling the drain for years and has fallen victim (like most of society) to profits uber alice. I'm normally an optimist but struggle when it comes to football. Fuck the other 16 for playing their role in continuing the status quo, beggars belief! The proposed super league was to break away from Uefa. They would have continued to boss the premier league with the rules super league or not. And it doesn't beggar belief if your one of those other clubs and can't/unwilling to compete. It actually makes sense for them to take this position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likelylad Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Interesting to see what happens once the full decision comes out regarding the legality in the next few weeks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now