Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am Italian and follow him every week. 

Tonali played for Milan 3 years. 

The first season: very bad. Second: great. Third: average. 

He is a good player. But not a top talent. He is not in the league of Bruno and Isak. For me you have overpaid: the fair price is 40-45m euro. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it’s the expectations of being the new Pirlo or Gattuso. He’s his own player. He looked fantastic last night - his passing, determination with challenges and chasing the ball  not to mention his set-play pieces. He does look like he’ll definitely match that quality of Bruno and possibly more. You have to remember he’s still young too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jigen said:

I am Italian and follow him every week. 

Tonali played for Milan 3 years. 

The first season: very bad. Second: great. Third: average. 

He is a good player. But not a top talent. He is not in the league of Bruno and Isak. For me you have overpaid: the fair price is 40-45m euro. 

Your gain our loss then [emoji38] After 45mins cameo I look forward to him and Bruno tearing midfield open with precision passing! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jigen said:

I am Italian and follow him every week. 

Tonali played for Milan 3 years. 

The first season: very bad. Second: great. Third: average. 

He is a good player. But not a top talent. He is not in the league of Bruno and Isak. For me you have overpaid: the fair price is 40-45m euro. 

So we overpaid paid by around 7 million ? I’ll take that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, jigen said:

I am Italian and follow him every week. 

Tonali played for Milan 3 years. 

The first season: very bad. Second: great. Third: average. 

He is a good player. But not a top talent. He is not in the league of Bruno and Isak. For me you have overpaid: the fair price is 40-45m euro. 


We sign players based on their style and how we feel they fit into our team not simply on name recognition. We likely have a clear plan of how to used him and play to his strengths.
 

He’s got all the tools to do what we need of him and our coach has a track record of improving players, Bruno was already very good but is now a better player than the one we signed. 
 

We would always have to pay a premium to get a hometown kid from a side like Milan. 
 

He’ll be just fine. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GeordieDazzler said:


We sign players based on their style and how we feel they fit into our team not simply on name recognition. We likely have a clear plan of how to used him and play to his strengths.
 

He’s got all the tools to do what we need of him and our coach has a track record of improving players, Bruno was already very good but is now a better player than the one we signed. 
 

We would always have to pay a premium to get a hometown kid from a side like Milan. 
 

He’ll be just fine. 

 

Tonali is a good player. And with Tonali in place of Longstaff you have a better midfield. This is clear. But is Tonali worth 70m? No. Because he has not the ceiling of Bruno or Isak. 

For me you could buy better and cheaper. Manu Kone or Kephrem Thuram for example. 

 

 

Edited by jigen

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jigen said:

 

Tonali is a good player. And with Tonali in place of Longstaff you have a better midfield. This is clear. But is Tonali worth 70m? No. Because he has not the ceiling of Bruno or Isak. 

For me you could buy better and cheaper. Manu Kone or Kephrem Thuram for example. 

 

 

 

Would definitely rather have Tonali than either of those two. And it's not particularly close.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should probably put this in the mark my words thread, but he'll be a better player than Declan Rice.

 

The fact he was our number 1 target and we payed ~£50m for him is enough to be excited, same for Barnes.

 

 

Edited by Hanshithispantz

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Should probably put this in the mark my words thread, but he'll be a better player than Declan Rice.

 

The fact he was our number 1 target and we payed ~£50m for him is enough to be excited, same for Barnes.

 

 

 

Aye wouldn’t bet against it either. 
 

Rice is quality but if Arteta is planning on playing both Odengaard and Havertz ahead of him he will have a shit load of work to do. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...