Jump to content

NUFC Transfer Rumours


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, WilliamPS said:

It doesn’t take much to get some peoples knickers in a twist.

 

The club look at hundreds of players and they will also know the squad needs some filling out, unless you want to see Ritchie etc in the bench again next season, so there could well be additions at good prices that aren’t straight into the first 11.

It's not his lack of ability It's his I injury record. We want to sign players we can actually play 

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, GEFAFWISP said:

We need more English if anything, Brexit Mags. Why not Gibbs-White, ESR and Gallagher for £300 million to replace the Brazilian lads and proceed to finish 9th.

It is, without doubt, player nationality that dictates performance and results. 

 

“He’d have finished that had he not been so English”

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Joelinton7 said:

ESR has played 18 league games in the last two seasons. Yeah, it’s a no from me. 

 

Sounds like he'd be perfect for us. 

 

Young, english, average but wildly expensive, and a crock to boot. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, KaKa said:

Stop all this crying about FFP for goodness sake.

 

We have good people in charge that have been excellent in getting good players in.

 

It's all going to be navigated just fine and dare I say much better than the majority of other clubs.

Surely it warrants a few ‘tears’. It is frustrating as hell and where better to vent? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Coffee_Johnny said:

Surely it warrants a few ‘tears’. It is frustrating as hell and where better to vent? 

 

Everyone is going to be in the same boat eventually.

 

I trust our bunch better than most to manage the whole situation.

 

It will be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

Everyone is going to be in the same boat eventually.

 

I trust our bunch better than most to manage the whole situation.

 

It will be fine.

 

How? As the rules currently exist the teams with most income from sponsers, corporate etc. will always hold a distinct advantage.

 

The bigger they are the stronger they become.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Irish Magpie said:

 

How? As the rules currently exist the teams with most income from sponsers, corporate etc. will always hold a distinct advantage.

 

The bigger they are the stronger they become.

 

And how is that working out for them?

 

Looks like it's done Chelsea and Man Utd a world of good.

 

Our sponsorship will come along and before then we'll be smarter and better in the market like we have been.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't see why we need to sell our best players unless they actively want to leave tbh.

 

We need to bring in more young players to develop and sell for profit. I've no idea who like, but that's what scouting is for. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KaKa said:

 

And how is that working out for them?

 

Looks like it's done Chelsea and Man Utd a world of good.

 

Our sponsorship will come along and before then we'll be smarter and better in the market like we have been.


Nobody is saying that these clubs won’t face difficult periods in the same way that a club outside of the established six cannot climb in to one of the top six positions in the league for a season or two; however, the advantages that they have in terms of finances due to their standing in the English game when financial fair play was introduced will always give them more of an advantage to rise back to the top.


That is what the problem is and why people are complaining about it.

 

They see their natural position as being the top six with the likes of us, Villa, Leicester and West Ham as having a natural position of seventh to thirteenth. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Irish Magpie said:

 

How? As the rules currently exist the teams with most income from sponsers, corporate etc. will always hold a distinct advantage.

 

The bigger they are the stronger they become.


What is Chelsea's position going to be if they fail to qualify for the CL again? Man Utd are also already butting up against FFP, hence why they had to loan Arambat. They’re either going to have to change the rules again to suit them, or end up hoisted on their own petards 

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Matt1892 said:


Nobody is saying that these clubs won’t face difficult periods in the same way that a club outside of the established six cannot climb in to one of the top six positions in the league for a season or two; however, the advantages that they have in terms of finances due to their standing in the English game when financial fair play was introduced will always give them more of an advantage to rise back to the top.


That is what the problem is and why people are complaining about it.

 

They see their natural position as being the top six with the likes of us, Villa, Leicester and West Ham as having a natural position of seventh to thirteenth. 

 

More financial power means nothing without the right manager and structure behind the scenes.

 

Most of these top clubs throw away a hell of a lot of money and are far lazier and less inventive in the market because of their riches.

 

I'm not convinced they have this great advantage people keep talking about. They are far more likely to blow £90 million on some current over hyped player than go for the £30 million player that isn't as hyped, but who the data is identifying as being a stud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GEFAFWISP said:

We need more English if anything, Brexit Mags. Why not Gibbs-White, ESR and Gallagher for £300 million to replace the Brazilian lads and proceed to finish 9th.

 

What is this turgid "Brexit Mags" toss people keep mentioning?  Also what would Brazilians have to do with Brexit? ?

 

 

Edited by Teasy

Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

More financial power means nothing without the right manager and structure behind the scenes.

 

Most of these top clubs throw away a hell of a lot of money and are far lazier and less inventive in the market because of their riches.

 

I'm not convinced they have this great advantage people keep talking about. They are far more likely to blow £90 million on some current over hyped player than go for the £30 million player that isn't as hyped, but who the data is identifying as being a stud.

 

True, but if they do have the right manager and structure behind the scenes then they can spend more money and slot right back into the top 4 positions ahead of teams who spend less. We finished ahead of Liverpool, Spurs and Villa last season, they've bought big stars into their teams and now they are top 4 we aren't.

 

Long term perhaps we'll catch them up, but that's not going to save this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

True, but if they do have the right manager and structure behind the scenes then they can spend more money and slot right back into the top 4 positions ahead of teams who spend less. We finished ahead of Liverpool, Spurs and Villa last season, they've bought big stars into their teams and now they are top 4 we aren't.

 

Long term perhaps we'll catch them up, but that's not going to save this season.

 

Villa and Spurs have bypassed us because they have had no European commitments. Liverpool have the Europa league where they have largely been able to use their backups.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, KaKa said:

Stop all this crying about FFP for goodness sake.

 

We have good people in charge that have been excellent in getting good players in.

 

It's all going to be navigated just fine and dare I say much better than the majority of other clubs.

Better than crying and insulting people everytime someone has a different opinion to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PeepShow4life said:

Better than crying and insulting people everytime someone has a different opinion to you.

 

Did you come up with that all by yourself? Very clever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

Villa and Spurs have bypassed us because they have had no European commitments. Liverpool have the Europa league where they have largely been able to use their backups.

 

Villa have European commitments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, OverThere said:

We could have and really should have used our back ups.

 

If we had done so and got smashed people would be complaining and saying the opposite.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...