Jump to content

NUFC Transfer Rumours


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

In place of Almiron?

 

IMO he's a 10 who sometimes plays wide. I *think* he would be good at 8, great profile for it. But he hasn't played there much in the PL from what I've seen.

 

Not as a like-for-like swap; just as an addition to our raft of versatile attacking players. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, r0cafella said:

I think MGW is class just not sure how fits in our 433 and have concerns over the price which will be eye watering. 

 

Been saying it for years and usually get rinsed for it :lol:, but 433 and 4231 are nigh on the the same system just with a slightly tweaked midfield and are interchangable really quickly along with 451. For me we can easily mix between the two options with him both as one of the flat 3 in a 433 or as the advanced player in the 4231. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

 

Been saying it for years and usually get rinsed for it :lol:, but 433 and 4231 are nigh on the the same system just with a slightly tweaked midfield and are interchangable really quickly along with 451. For me we can easily mix between the two options with him both as one of the flat 3 in a 433 or as the advanced player in the 4231. 

Think there's a pretty big distinction between the 2.

 

You think of classic 4-3-3 teams Guardiola's Barca, Rijkaard's Barca, any variation of Carlo's 4-3-3 for Madrid, Klopp's Liverpool. Very different to a 4-2-3-1.

 

I think the makeup of the midfield 3 is very different. In a 4-2-3-1 you can carry a classic luxury #10 and he's usually a crucial man. That player is usually tasked with a lot of G/A. You can play Ozil, Bergkamp type players there. And the 2 CMs usually "sit deeper". Also i think you can get away with more traditional wingers in a 4-2-3-1, like a Ryan Giggs. Typically a 4-2-3-1 is more defensive than a 4-3-3.

 

In a 4-3-3 there's more responsibility on the deepest midfielder and usually more athleticism required from the 8's. Crucially there's no 10. So goal creation and scoring is more dependent on the top 3 rather than being shared across 4 attackers.

 

The profile is different imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the Eddie Howe thread there’s a chorus of complaints about how we need to adapt our play, have a plan B, try new things, etc etc.

 

In this thread there is pushback on MGW because he doesn’t fit our system.

 

Personally I think he’d be an outstanding signing. Just ignore the fact some journalist said he was an Almiron replacement - he wouldn’t be aside from it being one body out, one body in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, sempuki said:

 

Very young and not a finished article.

 

But I would be over the moon if we sign him, exiting prospect and I think he will be a star!

 

Must say I find the link a bit strange, he is primarily a left winger and right footed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, High Five o said:

Very young and not a finished article.

 

But I would be over the moon if we sign him, exiting prospect and I think he will be a star!

 

Must say I find the link a bit strange, he is primarily a left winger and right footed.

We haven't been seriously linked with any left-footed attacker since Diaby.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't normally give any talk of MGW the time of day, but because the genuine (:lol:) interest from Saudi to spend £30m on Miggy might actually lead to a sale, who knows?

 

I actually think he would do really well over there so it's win-win all round.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...