janpawel Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 25 minutes ago, St1pe said: Thinking about it I don’t think there’s a better move for Delap than us - out of the clubs mentioned. We’ve got a ton of games coming so he’ll play a lot. He can learn from Isak. He’s got Howe coaching who’s improved so many of our first 11. We’ve also got a ton of English players so he’ll be seen a lot by Tuchel. Man u is a dodgy one for him I think because they need so much investment. He’ll have carry a lot of the burden and I think whatever they achieve next year it won’t be deemed good enough. Agreed US and Villa - only 1 striker to compete with, 60-70 games if we do well in cups, good managers, good atmosphere and support from club and fans Man U and Chelsea - toxic, ruin players, weaker strikers to compete with so probably more playing time, but way more pressure, as these 2 clubs SHOULD be at the top based on their finances, churn of players, management, negative press etc I also think at £30m it's an insane opportunity, like Huijsen was. Even if he does average for a CL club for 2 years, you'd easily make a decent profit on him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrymac1966 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago I have seen Delap trying to cheat the match officials rather than play a great game. His temperament could upset the dressing room so look elsewhere please Mr Mitchell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norseman Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Isak doesn't have the fitness of a Salah or Messi for instance, where they can play 90 mins every 3 days no problem. We'll need a second striker next season to come on at 60-70 minutes for Isak and start the odd game. Delap could be ideal for that role imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago We could do with a left footed freekick maestro in the team. have any of the linked right wingers got that in the locker? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted 42 minutes ago Share Posted 42 minutes ago 2 hours ago, SUPERTOON said: Do you think the minutes Wilson has gotten would have made much difference? I can’t recall Wilson getting that many tbh, only the odd ten minutes. Not sure that would have made much difference to Osula. Obviously I’m not sure the exact instructions he is given, but he doesn’t offer much when he has played. Quite clumsy on the ball and does give away possession. I think he goes out on loan next season. 217 minutes in the PL for Wilson compared to 96 for Osula Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted 38 minutes ago Share Posted 38 minutes ago And Osula has played more than 5 mins just 4 times Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted 7 minutes ago Share Posted 7 minutes ago Not liking Eze just trotting about there, mind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now