Jump to content

England's Lewis Hall


Paully

Recommended Posts

Definitely think it's time to give him a run in midfield. At least in the FA cup game anyway. He could play that more advanced LCM role we use better than Longstaff has done imo... Longstaff is completely unsuited to it and is a different player on the right.

 

Get him crossing from deep on the left and providing overlaps for Gordon. It makes sense in a lot of ways. 

 

 

Edited by Smal

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 19/12/2023 at 21:15, Lush Vlad said:

I know he’s young. But if you can’t get 40 minutes or so ahead of a 4 years past it Matt Ritchie. Then you’re not worth £28m and it’s a bit of a worry (N-O trademark). 

This. 

 

Again.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, SUPERTOON said:

Still hoping he isn’t playing so we don’t have to buy him tbh.

That's been my theory for a good while. 

 

Pretty sure Howe don't want him.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Prophet said:

Hasn't it been reported a fair bit now that the obligation isn't appearance based, with others going as far to say it's based on our final league position?

Explains The last 2 months then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

Hasn't it been reported a fair bit now that the obligation isn't appearance based, with others going as far to say it's based on our final league position?

You mean that random Chelsea ITK saying we pay unless we get relegated? No one has a clue what it’s based on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SUPERTOON said:

You mean that random Chelsea ITK saying we pay unless we get relegated? No one has a clue what it’s based on.

 

I think a couple of reporters picked it up? The Chelsea ITKs were saying it's if we don't get relegated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, not remotely worried about this.

 

If he's going he's going, if he's staying there will be a long term plan for him and a pathway into the first team, it might just take longer than we'd hoped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

Still hoping he isn’t playing so we don’t have to buy him tbh.

If this is the case surely it’s better for Chelsea and the player for us to send him back. Its not good for his development or confidence to be seeing Matt Richie getting on the pitch ahead of him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...