Lush Vlad Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 People suggesting Pope goes the other way as part of the deal. Not a chance while Parker is there IMO. The few times I’ve seen Burnley. They pass it around at the back more than most teams. Trafford is often heavily involved in their build up. I still think Pope is underrated on here as a keeper because of how bad he is with his feet. But because of that. I can’t think of a worse fit for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 39 minutes ago, SteV said: Valiant attempt to tap in Hope’s ball across the six-yard box. Will he “Darwin Nunez” it like his Joao Pedro previous baaaalls up? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 I’m assuming it was PSR related but we’ll have to pay a hell of a lot more than £16m to get him now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 12 minutes ago, St1pe said: I’m assuming it was PSR related but we’ll have to pay a hell of a lot more than £16m to get him now. One year less on his contract Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaj Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 12 hours ago, The Butcher said: Buy Trafford for 20 and send Pope the other way for 10. Win-win-ish. Buy Trafford for £70m and sell Pope for £60m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 59 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said: People suggesting Pope goes the other way as part of the deal. Not a chance while Parker is there IMO. The few times I’ve seen Burnley. They pass it around at the back more than most teams. Trafford is often heavily involved in their build up. I still think Pope is underrated on here as a keeper because of how bad he is with his feet. But because of that. I can’t think of a worse fit for them. Yeah, Pope wouldn't suit them under Parker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Not coming then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Another clean sheet tonight. (only 2 shots on target). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CallumG6 Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Only just found out today this lad is a Cumbrian! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Really don't want a shithousing 'keeper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
greydos Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 16 minutes ago, nemtizz said: Really don't want a shithousing 'keeper. Playing for any team other than Newcastle? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 19 minutes ago, CallumG6 said: Only just found out today this lad is a Cumbrian! Don't buy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 What I like most about Cumbrians, are their girlfriends. It's true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Goelies are rarley 510 like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Gooliea even Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I feel with Trafford we should do a Chelsea amortisation deal, offer an 8 year contract, goalkeepers are less risk and play the longest. He's young also. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
janpawel Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 minute ago, mighty__mag said: I feel with Trafford we should do a Chelsea amortisation deal, offer an 8 year contract, goalkeepers are less risk and play the longest. He's young also. That loophole was closed ages ago, contracts are amortisised over 5 years maximum I think the only benefit of what Chelsea do for them, is that they can pay players lower wages over a longer time, so players are more inclined to sign with them in some circumstances Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2 minutes ago, mighty__mag said: I feel with Trafford we should do a Chelsea amortisation deal, offer an 8 year contract, goalkeepers are less risk and play the longest. He's young also. If I’m not mistaken, that rule has been changed (due to Chelsea abusing it). It’s now a 5 year cap on amortisation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 14 hours ago, JT24 said: If I’m not mistaken, that rule has been changed (due to Chelsea abusing it). It’s now a 5 year cap on amortisation. Yeah, I'd forgot about that. They did change it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC91 Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 Might be in the minority but buying Trafford isn't the answer for me, if we want to progress is buying another Burnley keeper the way forward. Personally think we can get caught up in buying the easy 'English' option. Team who wants Europe again so we not need to be more ambitious? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 1 minute ago, NUFC91 said: Might be in the minority but buying Trafford isn't the answer for me, if we want to progress is buying another Burnley keeper the way forward. Personally think we can get caught up in buying the easy 'English' option. Team who wants Europe again so we not need to be more ambitious? Is this about Trafford though, or the fact he’s English and comes from Burnley? I’ve basically never seen him play, so I don’t really know. But he is pretty highly rated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 The bright side is that anyone we sign should look like Pope and Dubs did when they first arrived. It’ll be a breath of fresh air. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonsays Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 5 minutes ago, NUFC91 said: Might be in the minority but buying Trafford isn't the answer for me, if we want to progress is buying another Burnley keeper the way forward. Personally think we can get caught up in buying the easy 'English' option. Team who wants Europe again so we not need to be more ambitious? He hasn't conceded a goal since before Christmas which suggests he might be ok. What reasons do you have for thinking he isn't good enough? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack j Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 (edited) 8 minutes ago, NUFC91 said: Might be in the minority but buying Trafford isn't the answer for me, if we want to progress is buying another Burnley keeper the way forward. Personally think we can get caught up in buying the easy 'English' option. Team who wants Europe again so we not need to be more ambitious? He's came through at man city. If we'd signed him directly from there would it have been a problem for as many? If We signed cole palmer when he wasn't getting a game at city I'm sure there'd be plenty saying it was another shite english signing Also Burnley hardly play like they did when Pope was there under dyche Edited February 27 by jack j Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 FWIW I'm also more excited by unknown forrins. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now