TheBrownBottle Posted yesterday at 08:23 Share Posted yesterday at 08:23 2 hours ago, Sibierski said: Not to the required levels we would’ve needed, but would’ve been a better option than Wilson due to the pace / physical threat, and the bit of unknown that makes CBs think twice. As season has gone on, it’s been made clear to me that Howe sees him as a winger anyway, so we will sign a ST. Then it’s Osula / New RW, with Murphy eventually a back up RB / RWB as the squad evolves. Yeah, I could see a positional switch a la Joelinton. 3 hours ago, ExiledGeordie said: I think he’s definitely shown flashes and looks like he could be a player so I think it’s unfair to say he’s useless etc. he certainly looked lively when he came on against Everton. He’s fast, strong, quick turns, must be very difficult to play against. If we’re relying on him as a backup option we’re knackered though. I agree - I don’t think the lad is useless or owt, just think he’s currently a fair way short Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted yesterday at 10:23 Share Posted yesterday at 10:23 8 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said: Just say Isak gets injured at the start of next season - do you think that Osula can step in? Why not? for a while anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledGeordie Posted yesterday at 10:30 Share Posted yesterday at 10:30 7 minutes ago, andycap said: Why not? for a while anyway. Leave it out mate 😂 We’re in the CL ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted yesterday at 10:34 Share Posted yesterday at 10:34 He was never signed to be a backup to Isak, he was signed to (in the short term) take a few minutes away from Wilson and maybe fill in wide roles as well. Sadly Wilson has been perma-crocked as usual. There's surely no world in which we intend Osula to be second choice next season, but I also think he will be a great asset to the squad overall. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikky Posted yesterday at 10:42 Share Posted yesterday at 10:42 5 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: He was never signed to be a backup to Isak, he was signed to (in the short term) take a few minutes away from Wilson and maybe fill in wide roles as well. Sadly Wilson has been perma-crocked as usual. There's surely no world in which we intend Osula to be second choice next season, but I also think he will be a great asset to the squad overall. Aye - can play 2 positions - defo worth keeping around - there will be a time when he will be called upon as Isak plus 1 are going to be either injured or need of a break - I have flashbacks to Bournemouth away 2 years ago when we were on our knees Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 9 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said: Just say Isak gets injured at the start of next season - do you think that Osula can step in? dont think anyone is saying that. we need a back up striker to isak no doubt but this kid would be a valuable squad member. he's played in the champo already. he's looked canny in a sub role for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyn davies Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago Said previously he could do right wing as opposed to striker , but yeah could step in as needed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 2 hours ago, ExiledGeordie said: Leave it out mate 😂 We’re in the CL ffs And? If he's needed I think he'd do a good job up top. We more than likely sign a back up striker anyway like mbuemo but I wouldn't be up in arms if he had to start for a few games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now