Southampton 1-3 Newcastle United - 25/1/25

[Stifler]

7 minutes ago, Disco said:

Love a completely made up Stifler post.

🥰

 

They aren’t as big of a club as people think though.

[Disco]

7 minutes ago, Stifler said:

🥰

 

They aren’t as big of a club as people think though.

Absolutely nobody thinks they’re a big club, not even their own fans. 

Where they’ve been recently is exactly what you’d expect.

[Nine]

How far offside was their disallowed goal? Havnt seen it yet 

 

 

Edited Saturday at 22:47 by Nine

[The Bonk]

@Nine VAR lines looked about 2 yards, maybe slightly less. Tino lets off throws his arm up slightly and yells at Schar to let the ball go, hence him being so open, tidy finish regardless.

[huss9]

one of tha fan coaches has broken down near birmingham on the way back.

imagine if we'd been beaten?

[Pancrate1892]

Their stadium must be the most boring generic bowl out there. 

[BonesJones]

10 minutes ago, Pancrate1892 said:

Their stadium must be the most boring generic bowl out there. 

Perfectly matched to their bland fans.

 

 

Edited Saturday at 23:17 by BonesJones

[NEEJ]

The second and third goals are both absolutely lush, like. 

[Yorkie]

Have to say I was expecting a bit more from the third based on people's reactions.  Tidy goal, like. Maybe I'm getting desensitised to the quality of some of our players. 

[Superior Acuña]

Fuck off highlighting his pen technique Al 

[NEEJ]

9 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Have to say I was expecting a bit more from the third based on people's reactions.  Tidy goal, like. Maybe I'm getting desensitised to the quality of some of our players. 

It's the effortlessness of the goal and the fact it's Sandro that makes it for me. Plus his celebration

[LFEE]

8 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Have to say I was expecting a bit more from the third based on people's reactions.  Tidy goal, like. Maybe I'm getting desensitised to the quality of some of our players. 

All in the one touch build up. Sandro’s reading of the move from 30 yards away. Time to overthink yet kept his cool and give GK the eyes and slotted in emphatically. One of our best goals this season.

[Yorkie]

It's a nice goal for sure. Second one was better though imo. Another brilliant assist; Murphy's touch past the defender is fantastic and the pass is perfect - then an incredible first touch from Isak followed by a top finish. 

 

Both goals show our ruthlessness which is always so great to see. 

[Jamesmcc222]

1 minute ago, Yorkie said:

It's a nice goal for sure. Second one was better though imo. Another brilliant assist; Murphy's touch past the defender is fantastic and the pass is perfect - then an incredible first touch from Isak followed by a top finish. 

 

Both goals show our ruthlessness which is always so great to see. 

I think the third one seems better when you are watching it live, the anticipation when he is running through makes the finish that much better. It’s one of those on highlights once you know it’s a goal doesn’t have quite the same hit. Still a lovely bit of play though and shows Tonali at his absolute best.

 

Both great goals to be honest, with genuine top class play. 

[Teasy]

Quote

If you’re not aware that Le Tissier has went down the conspiracy wank rabbit hole then he’s been off your radar for a while.  He absolutely is a conspiracy nonce.

 

Oh yeah ok I've been off the radar because I haven't realised about the "conspiracy wank rabbit hole". Have you maybe considered that you're spouting childish nonsense?

 

 

Edited Sunday at 02:46 by Teasy

[alexf]

1 minute ago, Teasy said:

 

 

 

Oh yeah ok I've been off the radar because I haven't realised about the "conspiracy wank rabbit hole". Have you maybe considered that you're sprouting childish nonsense?

Where have you been?  Have you not wondered why there is a "makes you think?" In every other thread these days.

[Teasy]

15 minutes ago, alexf said:

Where have you been?  Have you not wondered why there is a "makes you think?" In every other thread these days.

 

I've been in the real world, I actually do think, apparently you don't?  Memes aren't something you should consider thought.

 

Here's an idea, how about people keep their political opinions to themselves on a Football forum.  There's plenty of Football based reasons for Newcastle fans to dislike Matt Le Tissier.  

 

 

Edited Sunday at 02:59 by Teasy

[TomYam]

4 hours ago, Disco said:

Absolutely nobody thinks they’re a big club, not even their own fans. 

Where they’ve been recently is exactly what you’d expect.

Agree with this.

Southampton ascented to the FL in 1920'21 and quickly became stalwarts of the second tier.

They got their first taste of top tier football in 1966-67 and have subsequently played at the highest level for 47 of the last 59 seasons.

The Saints have finished in the top 4 only once - in 1983-4, when they were runners up to the Red Pool of Liver. 

[alexf]

23 minutes ago, Teasy said:

 

I've been in the real world, I actually do think, apparently you don't?  Memes aren't something you should consider thought.

 

Here's an idea, how about people keep their political opinions to themselves on a Football forum.  There's plenty of Football based reasons for Newcastle fans to dislike Matt Le Tissier.  

 

 

 

Wow ok. I didn't see the whole conversation just your post suggesting the guy was making up childish nonsense calling Le tissier a conspiracy theory guy. 

 

But a quick Google shows that he quite clearly has gone down that path.

https://onefootball.com/id/berita/11-of-matt-le-tissiers-wildest-conspiracy-theories-from-vaccines-to-the-communist-takeover-37793318

[TheBrownBottle]

52 minutes ago, Teasy said:

 

Oh yeah ok I've been off the radar because I haven't realised about the "conspiracy wank rabbit hole". Have you maybe considered that you're spouting childish nonsense?

 

 

 

Usually best to actually quote me if you’re going to quote me

44 minutes ago, Teasy said:

 

I've been in the real world, I actually do think, apparently you don't?  Memes aren't something you should consider thought.

 

Here's an idea, how about people keep their political opinions to themselves on a Football forum.  There's plenty of Football based reasons for Newcastle fans to dislike Matt Le Tissier.  

 

 

 

They aren’t ’political opinions’.  Le Tissier went crackers of the loony variety; conspiracies aren’t political unless you’re on the lunatic fringe.  Scoring a few crackers of the goal variety isn’t usually enough of a football reason to dislike a player - most of the players I remember hating had little to do with performances vs NUFC.

[TheBrownBottle]

5 hours ago, Stifler said:

🥰

 

They aren’t as big of a club as people think though.

I’ve never met anyone ever who put ‘club’ ‘big’ and ‘Southampton’ into the same sentence

 

edit: including their fans, who’ve never came across as arrogant or entitled to me.  Maybe they are and I’ve missed it

 

 

Edited Sunday at 03:27 by TheBrownBottle

[kingxlnc]

3 hours ago, NEEJ said:

The second and third goals are both absolutely lush, like. 

Proper PlayStation FIFA type of goals for 

[Teasy]

1 hour ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Usually best to actually quote me if you’re going to quote me

They aren’t ’political opinions’.  Le Tissier went crackers of the loony variety; conspiracies aren’t political unless you’re on the lunatic fringe.  Scoring a few crackers of the goal variety isn’t usually enough of a football reason to dislike a player - most of the players I remember hating had little to do with performances vs NUFC.

 

Opinions aren't opinions if you disagree with them and call them conspiracies?  Completely ridiculous.  I don't need to agree with Matt Le Tissier to know he is allowed an opinions.  Loud mouth know nothings like you who just repeat rubbish irritate me far more than he does.

 

 

Edited Sunday at 04:33 by Teasy

[TheBrownBottle]

1 hour ago, Teasy said:

 

Opinions aren't opinions if you disagree with them and call them conspiracies?  Completely ridiculous.  I don't need to agree with Matt Le Tissier to know he is allowed an opinions.  Loud mouth know nothings like you who just repeat rubbish irritate me far more than he does.

 

 

 

I never said he isn’t entitled to an opinion, just as I’m entitled to call him a maladjusted wanker who is spreading lies and fear using his privileged platform despite speaking from a position of zero expertise.  He’s absolutely allowed to do that.  I also said that they aren’t political opinions, because they’re not. 

 

Why do folks like you always think that criticising someone’s opinion is the same as saying they aren’t allowed an opinion?  Probably best to calm yourself down and read what people have written first.  Peace and love xx

 

 

Edited Sunday at 06:12 by TheBrownBottle

[Groundhog63]

55 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

I never said he isn’t entitled to an opinion, just as I’m entitled to call him a maladjusted wanker who is spreading lies and fear using his privileged platform despite speaking from a position of zero expertise.  He’s absolutely allowed to do that.  I also said that they aren’t political opinions, because they’re not. 

 

Why do folks like you always think that criticising someone’s opinion is the same as saying they aren’t allowed an opinion?  Probably best to calm yourself down and read what people have written first.  Peace and love xx

 

 

 

Pipe down, loud mouth, know nowt 😂😂😂😂

 

 

Edited Sunday at 07:07 by Groundhog63