gdm Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Charlton have made Darren Bent available for sale. according to talksport Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 What is your source? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Supposing it's true, he'd cost a bomb and he's too similar to what we already have (Owen/Martins) imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 What is your source? Talksport, you mong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 On SSN 'Ready to listen to offers' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Too expensive. Too similar to what we already have. Too injured. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Looks like defoe may be off to Villa with Bent comming in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Suprised tbh, first thing you want for a relegation battle is a goalscorer! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Looks like defoe may be off to Villa with Bent comming in. Why? Defoe is in form and not injured. Stupid change IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Suprised tbh, first thing you want for a relegation battle is a goalscorer! They likely accept they are doomed - plan for the future promotion push. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Suprised tbh, first thing you want for a relegation battle is a goalscorer! Very true but Charlton gave Dowie much more money than they ever gave Curbishley to spend in one summer and the idiot blew it such numpties as Faye, Traore etc etc. I reckon they have to sell to buy. He's the most valuable asset they have. If they can buy a few decent players with the money made from his sale they'll hope one or two of them hit form at the right time. Thats my logic on it anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Suprised tbh, first thing you want for a relegation battle is a goalscorer! They likely accept they are doomed - plan for the future promotion push. Aye. Bent's value will only go down from here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Looks like defoe may be off to Villa with Bent comming in. Why? Defoe is in form and not injured. Stupid change IMO. Think i agree with you tbh. Other reports are saying that Keane will be off to villa in a swap deal with Barry and Bent will be Keane's replacement. Think i like this deal better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Get him. As much as we have other priorities I am salivating over the thought of Owen, Martins and Bent as our first three strikers. I dare say those 3 together could form the most lethal strikeforce the league has ever seen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Get him. As much as we have other priorities I am salivating over the thought of Owen, Martins and Bent as our first three strikers. I dare say those 3 together could form the most lethal strikeforce the league has ever seen. Wouldn't even be the best strikeforce we've had since we came into the Premier League and it wouldn't be the best strikeforce in the league at present either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Looks like defoe may be off to Villa with Bent comming in. Why? Defoe is in form and not injured. Stupid change IMO. Think i agree with you tbh. Other reports are saying that Keane will be off to villa in a swap deal with Barry and Bent will be Keane's replacement. Think i like this deal better. If Spurs fans think Barry will be going anywhere, then they're even more deluded than I imagined. You've got to be joking. We desperately need new players in, and we've got plenty of money, why on earth would be sell our best player, who signed a new 4 year contract 4 months ago? EDIT I see where you've got that now, some numpty on gg posting his fantasy move in reply to you. "Reports" my arse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC06 Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 I prefer Crouch instead of Bent if they cost the same amount of money just because we need some tall striker who can hold the ball and can play in the air Just my humble opinion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Get him. As much as we have other priorities I am salivating over the thought of Owen, Martins and Bent as our first three strikers. I dare say those 3 together could form the most lethal strikeforce the league has ever seen. Wouldn't even be the best strikeforce we've had since we came into the Premier League and it wouldn't be the best strikeforce in the league at present either. Agreed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Get him. As much as we have other priorities I am salivating over the thought of Owen, Martins and Bent as our first three strikers. I dare say those 3 together could form the most lethal strikeforce the league has ever seen. Wouldn't even be the best strikeforce we've had since we came into the Premier League and it wouldn't be the best strikeforce in the league at present either. Owen 20+ goals a season providing he doesn't get crippled, Martins should be good for atleast 15+ and the Bent could produce another 20 goals. Can't think of many other clubs that can produce that sort of goal power. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 I prefer Crouch instead of Bent if they cost the same amount of money just because we need some tall striker who can hold the ball and can play in the air Just my humble opinion Bent is a much, much better player than Crouch. Cliche I know, but it is true, for a big man, Crouch really isn't that good in the air. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Get him. As much as we have other priorities I am salivating over the thought of Owen, Martins and Bent as our first three strikers. I dare say those 3 together could form the most lethal strikeforce the league has ever seen. Wouldn't even be the best strikeforce we've had since we came into the Premier League and it wouldn't be the best strikeforce in the league at present either. Owen 20+ goals a season providing he doesn't get crippled, Martins should be good for atleast 15+ and the Bent could produce another 20 goals. Can't think of many other clubs that can produce that sort of goal power. All the bits in bold are bollocks, sorry. Plus, you don't play them all together, and there's no suggestion we can provide that many goals to them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 EDIT I see where you've got that now, some numpty on gg posting his fantasy move in reply to you. "Reports" my arse. Different day, same shit from Spurs fans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest teepee Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 that must be charlton admitting they are doomed - and wanting to cash in before his vaule decreases. i'd love him here - but i reckon he'd be way too expensive Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 They'd want at least £8m for him, Shirley? Too much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Looks like defoe may be off to Villa with Bent comming in. Why? Defoe is in form and not injured. Stupid change IMO. Think i agree with you tbh. Other reports are saying that Keane will be off to villa in a swap deal with Barry and Bent will be Keane's replacement. Think i like this deal better. If Spurs fans think Barry will be going anywhere, then they're even more deluded than I imagined. You've got to be joking. We desperately need new players in, and we've got plenty of money, why on earth would be sell our best player, who signed a new 4 year contract 4 months ago? This comming from a person that supports a club that had 20+ page thread on there forum going on about Defoe apparantly being spotted at some hotel in Birmingham and some forum members even had the audacity to say they spoke with him on the phone :lol: :lol: . Its a well known fact that Barry is a spurs fan and if the money is right im pretty sure you'd accept regardless of Lerner's millions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now