BottledDog Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 well he didn't get what he was owed from Man City I think he did actually as we paid the extra £300k which presumably will have went straight to him Glad we're not being played for mugs anymore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Whats £300k when Vic has something else to moan about? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 By the time you've finished arguing about this he'll of earned the same again, and that again is before he's even kicked a ball in anger. and? so his obscene contract makes his behaviour irrelevant? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nappy Rash Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 whatever, brain of britain here Is the best apology you've got in you I bet head hunters pester the fuck out of you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 By the time you've finished arguing about this he'll of earned the same again, and that again is before he's even kicked a ball in anger. and? so his obscene contract makes his behaviour irrelevant? Why is it obscene? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Whats £300k when Vic has something else to moan about? aye it's nowt important is it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Whats £300k when Vic has something else to moan about? aye it's nowt important is it? Well its not going to make a difference to your life is it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Whats £300k when Vic has something else to moan about? aye it's nowt important is it? Not now we have a mega super hyper bazillionaire in charge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nappy Rash Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 aye it's nowt important is it? Whats £300k when we made a profit and sold for more, a player who he is replacing? Do you just like whinging about fuck all for the sake of it? Money is now no object, edudate yourself a little and try and move on, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 I bet joey barton could ass rape you idiots and you'd put a positivie spin on it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 I bet joey barton could ass rape you idiots and you'd put a positivie spin on it Well at least one of us would be having sex. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nappy Rash Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 I bet joey barton could ass rape you idiots and you'd put a positivie spin on it I bet you'd be wrong as usual You remind me of a dickhead thats sits behind me at SJP and whinges when we win 5-1 because they could have scored in the first half and we'd never have won 5-1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 you remind me of someone who gets fucked over regularly and can't see it through your stupidity Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 fact is we all know it'll be down to mackay fact is mackay works for barton fact is barton is patently not the brightest spark around fact is we know joey ain't been sitting there pouring over his accounts and the legal details of his contract demanding his 300k what we'd all LIKE to have seen was barton tell mackay just to forget it given the bad press he's courted recently but he's not done that for whatever reason we, as a club, have decided to pay it in order to push the transfer through presumably as allardyce believes that for 5.8m he's getting a very good player and it would stop west ham paying the 300k and getting him...at the end of the day based purely on football we swapped parker for barton and got 1.3m in return no-one comes out of this deal well in my opinion, not barton, mackay, man city or nufc so move on.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Whats £300k when we made a profit and sold for more, a player who he is replacing? Do you just like whinging about f*** all for the sake of it? Money is now no object, edudate yourself a little and try and move on, The last line is a bit unfortunate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 fact is we all know it'll be down to mackay fact is mackay works for barton fact is barton is patently not the brightest spark around fact is we know joey ain't been sitting there pouring over his accounts and the legal details of his contract demanding his 300k what we'd all LIKE to have seen was barton tell mackay just to forget it given the bad press he's courted recently but he's not done that for whatever reason we, as a club, have decided to pay it in order to push the transfer through presumably as allardyce believes that for 5.8m he's getting a very good player and it would stop west ham paying the 300k and getting him...at the end of the day based purely on football we swapped parker for barton and got 1.3m in return no-one comes out of this deal well in my opinion, not barton, mackay, man city or nufc so move on.... man city came out of it extremely well, get paid £5.8m for an employee that cost you nothing and in any other business would have been sacked for no financial return Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nappy Rash Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 you remind me of someone who gets f***** over regularly and can't see it through your stupidity I saw a post yesterday insunuating you are wrong virtually 100% of the time, I wonder why a poster got that absurd idea Totally and utterly fuckin oblivious Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 you remind me of someone who gets f***** over regularly and can't see it through your stupidity I saw a post yesterday insunuating you are wrong virtually 100% of the time, I wonder why a poster got that absurd idea Totally and utterly fuckin oblivious you think Joey Jo Jo deserves £300k I think i'm on safe ground here tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 I think we should chuck in an extra £200k as a thank you for him choosing us over West Ham. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nappy Rash Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 you think Joey Jo Jo deserves £300k I think i'm on safe ground here tbh Did I say he he deserves anything or are you asking another fuckin stupid question? His contract stated that he could move if anyone offered £5.5m, he didnt ask for a move so legally he is entitled to his "loyalty" payment. But your oblivious "safe ground" and ridiculous strawmen obviously supercede legal frameworks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 you think Joey Jo Jo deserves £300k I think i'm on safe ground here tbh Did I say he he deserves anything or are you asking another fuckin stupid question? His contract stated that he could move if anyone offered £5.5m, he didnt ask for a move so legally he is entitled to his "loyalty" payment. But your oblivious "safe ground" and ridiculous strawmen obviously supercede legal frameworks I must be confused, I thought you were defending paying Barton £300k and yes, he did ask for a transfer, he had the option to not to talk to us and demonstrate the very loyalty he was being paid for, when in fact the little scrote jumped at the chance, and both he and city are laughing all the way to the bank Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nappy Rash Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 I must be confused, I thought you were defending paying Barton £300k Why because I used basic logic to say he had been paid £300k? I suppose if you closed your eyes, ran around in circles for 30 mins and downed a litre ov Vodka you could come to that conclusion like. and yes, he did ask for a transfer, he had the option to not to talk to us and demonstrate the very loyalty he was being paid for, when in fact the little scrote jumped at the chance, and both he and city are laughing all the way to the bank No he did not ask for a transfer, he exercised his right to talk to a club meeting the release clause (this is the important part) Manchester City insterted into his contract. All very, very simple Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 you think Joey Jo Jo deserves £300k I think i'm on safe ground here tbh Did I say he he deserves anything or are you asking another fuckin stupid question? His contract stated that he could move if anyone offered £5.5m, he didnt ask for a move so legally he is entitled to his "loyalty" payment. But your oblivious "safe ground" and ridiculous strawmen obviously supercede legal frameworks I must be confused, I thought you were defending paying Barton £300k and yes, he did ask for a transfer, he had the option to not to talk to us and demonstrate the very loyalty he was being paid for, when in fact the little scrote jumped at the chance, and both he and city are laughing all the way to the bank get a grip man, he's at a club where he's been suspended and told he should leave a release clause is met and what? he's gonna say nah this is a right laugh here i think i'll stay and not play football again for the remainder of my contract.... jesus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 I must be confused, I thought you were defending paying Barton £300k Why because I used basic logic to say he had been paid £300k? I suppose if you closed your eyes, ran around in circles for 30 mins and downed a litre ov Vodka you could come to that conclusion like. and yes, he did ask for a transfer, he had the option to not to talk to us and demonstrate the very loyalty he was being paid for, when in fact the little scrote jumped at the chance, and both he and city are laughing all the way to the bank No he did not ask for a transfer, he exercised his right to talk to a club meeting the release clause (this is the important part) Manchester City insterted into his contract. All very, very simple ah right so his loyalty extends only so far? I wonder why they had to have a release clause in the first place, if in fact it was City that asked for it and not willie mckay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 you think Joey Jo Jo deserves £300k I think i'm on safe ground here tbh Did I say he he deserves anything or are you asking another fuckin stupid question? His contract stated that he could move if anyone offered £5.5m, he didnt ask for a move so legally he is entitled to his "loyalty" payment. But your oblivious "safe ground" and ridiculous strawmen obviously supercede legal frameworks I must be confused, I thought you were defending paying Barton £300k and yes, he did ask for a transfer, he had the option to not to talk to us and demonstrate the very loyalty he was being paid for, when in fact the little scrote jumped at the chance, and both he and city are laughing all the way to the bank get a grip man, he's at a club where he's been suspended and told he should leave a release clause is met and what? he's gonna say nah this is a right laugh here i think i'll stay and not play football again for the remainder of my contract.... jesus who asked him to leave? and after all that you think the word loyalty has any place in this situation? daft if anything Barton owes City in damages Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now