Jump to content

Aldo Duscher arrives on trial - and promptly leaves?


Nicky

Recommended Posts

Also, the trial would indicate that his club are happy to sell, the fee probably won't be big and, with any luck, he won't be on huge wages.

 

He doesn't have a club now. He's available on a bosman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know an awful lot about him, he sounds German?

 

From what I've read, he sounds like a hard at it, combative midfielder, exactly like Parker is.

 

So it seems that he could perhaps be a replacement for Parker, and for free there can be no complaints really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

People are going hysterical when he hasn't even signed yet. Sam's doing the proper thing by trying him out first, there's every chance he won't be good enough and Sam won't be too fussed. You lose nowt for giving someone a trial; we'll find out whether he's good enough or not in a weeks time - no reason to start speculating on his quality (or potential lack of) at this time.

 

Sam's done nowt wrong, infact, it's a really good idea. Very highly rated a year or so ago - he plays a position where we've only got one other member of the squad who can play - so he's getting in some European cover for free; or atleast is going to see whether or not it's worth it to.

 

Take a look at our past two managers' transfer debacles before you slate Sam's methods - we'd have never seen this under Roeder ffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Verlaine

I don't know an awful lot about him, he sounds German?

 

From what I've read, he sounds like a hard at it, combative midfielder, exactly like Parker is.

 

So it seems that he could perhaps be a replacement for Parker, and for free there can be no complaints really.

 

Argentine. There was a fairly detailed thread about him, if I recall, when we were linked under Souness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its clear we need another defensive midfielder and that no agreement was reached with Edmilson. Sam is certainly carrying on as if he was still at Bolton,strange because one of the reasons he left Bolton was the lack of spending power.

Does Sam feel he cant attract top players in our present situation?

Is there any money actually available or does the club have to repay its debts first?

 

He believes in his own man-management skills & he trying to pump life back into the existing squad first, while boosting the squad with established premiership player/internationals. I would imagine next Jan or next preseason will be when the ante is upped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a trial and a possible free transfer. The most we can possibly lose in this deal is...nowt.

 

nowt.

 

nowt.

 

nothing.

 

nowt.

 

what is there to be possibly worried about?

 

nowt.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Invicta_Toon

Vic will no doubt find something wrong.

 

that just wouldn't do would it? someone having a different opinion

 

get over your fucking self

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Invicta_Toon

Vic will no doubt find something wrong.

 

without question but that's because he's senile.

 

 

you don't need to be senile to realise top teams and top managers don't piss around wasting time on free trialists in a transfer window when they have money in their pocket

 

small time deals for small time fans like you tbh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vic will no doubt find something wrong.

 

without question but that's because he's senile.

 

 

you don't need to be senile to realise top teams and top managers don't piss around wasting time on free trialists in a transfer window when they have money in their pocket

 

small time deals for small time fans like you tbh

 

Look at Liverpool & Spurs' incoming transfers...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Potentially:

 

Rozenhal, Geremi, Duscher, Barton, Viduka=£8.9m

 

Or we could have gone a different direction:

 

Gordon, Anderson, Halford, Richardson, Chopra=£24m approx

 

:lol:

 

 

 

Both us & the Scum have had knock backs:

 

Ben-Haim - Joining Champions League qualifier's & premiership runners up Chelsea

Beye - Staying with Champions League qualifier's & France's biggest club Marseilles

 

Nugent -  Didn't say no to Sunderland but the silence said it all & Sunderland withdrew the bid.

I went through the squads one-on-one and there was no comparison really," said Nugent. "That was really a big factor in my decision. Sunderland are a big club but Portsmouth have got the players in and are ambitious
http://football.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/0,,2124233,00.html

 

Baird - Fancied the relegation battle with with a chap with some Northern Ireland roots like him, rather than a dog wanking prick from Southern Ireland.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, the trial would indicate that his club are happy to sell, the fee probably won't be big and, with any luck, he won't be on huge wages.

 

He doesn't have a club now. He's available on a bosman.

 

Oh didn't realise. Even better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a trial and a possible free transfer. The most we can possibly lose in this deal is...nowt.

 

what is there to be possibly worried about?

 

As I said on the last page, I don't think it's that simple. If we sign Duscher it means we're not getting someone else. And if it turns out Duscher isn't good enough we're stuck with him, probably for two or more years on decent wages (plus signing on fee), and if an opportunity comes up to sign a better player we could have a problem peddling him. In short, we don't want to end up with dead wood.

 

I don't know how Duscher will turn out, but these are my reservations. We have experience in Butt, and experienced cover available in Geremi. This is one position where I think a youthful understudy may be a better answer. Just my thoughts, I'm not against this signing but I feel we'd be better off forking out a bit of money on an up and coming player with his best years just ahead of him like Diarra from Chelsea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Verlaine

Vic will no doubt find something wrong.

 

that just wouldn't do would it? someone having a different opinion

 

get over your f****** self

 

You always seem to have a different opinion, though, Vic. Coincidence? Or contrariness?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a trial and a possible free transfer. The most we can possibly lose in this deal is...nowt.

 

what is there to be possibly worried about?

 

As I said on the last page, I don't think it's that simple. If we sign Duscher it means we're not getting someone else. And if it turns out Duscher isn't good enough, we send him back to Deportivo, probably for two or more years on decent wages (plus signing on fee), and if an opportunity comes up to sign a better player we could have a problem peddling him. In short, we don't want to end up with dead wood.

 

I don't know how Duscher will turn out, but these are my reservations. We have experience in Butt, and experienced cover available in Geremi. This is one position where I think a youthful understudy may be a better answer. Just my thoughts, I'm not against this signing but I feel we're possibly missing out on a lot of better options.

 

FYP. Do people not understand the concept of trials?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Invicta_Toon

you're forgetting Sam's previous turnover of shite non-appearing bodies

 

like I said, can't change his spots

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...