Yorkie Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 I'd say Tiote's our most important player. I think Jose's the most technically gifted plus he's still got so many years ahead of him. Jury's still out, to some degree, on HBA. Anything less than double-figures for Jose would be a disappointment. You haven't got the first clue what he earns, btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 I'd say Tiote's our most important player. I think Jose's the most technically gifted plus he's still got so many years ahead of him. Tiote and Barton are our most important players. Since Tiote's debut, we've not won one single game with him and Barton injured/suspended. Also LB is by default a less vulnerable position that DM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLoven11 Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 I'd say Tiote's our most important player. I think Jose's the most technically gifted plus he's still got so many years ahead of him. Tiote and Barton are our most important players. Since Tiote's debut, we've not won one single game with him and Barton injured/suspended. Also LB is by default a less vulnerable position that DM. Chelsea 4-3 in League cup? If you count this... Was only in that match last few minutes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 PL-games, forgot to mention that.. . 60k my ass No, you can kiss my ass.. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1187448/Meltdown-Newcastle-8217-s-71m-wage-nightmare--stay.html And I quote: " HARD TO SHIFT: JOEY BARTON £60,000 — who would be mad enough to buy him? JOSE ENRIQUE £60,000 — cost £6m, which was £6m too much. FABRICIO COLOCCINI £60,000 — he was frighteningly bad. XISCO £50,000 — an expensive flop." Have read a couple of other articles too that state he earns that amount. But there are some that mention £50 000. So he's probably on around 50-60 a year.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchie Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 Six million too much.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 Funny how those statements now are totally off the mark,, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 But the wages they cite are totally accurate. Absolutely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 It says Guthrie is on 40k when he's on about 5k a week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 But the wages they cite are totally accurate. Absolutely. Are you just blabbering or are actually going supply us with some sources that support your claims? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 What claims are those then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchie Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 WORTH KEEPING:NICKY BUTT £60,000 a week — a leader who will be needed. This tells you everything you need to know about that article. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 Anyone referencing the Daily Mail and passing off what they say as fact needs shot to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 Crap, I actually thought you wrote inaccurate, read to fast, again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 I'll try to find a more serious source than the daily mail.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 WORTH KEEPING:NICKY BUTT £60,000 a week — a leader who will be needed. This tells you everything you need to know about that article. :nope: :nope: :frantic: :nope: :nope: <a href="http://www.gifbin.com/983272"><img src="http://www.gifbin.com/bin/082009/1249977126_dramatic_black_woman.gif" alt="funny gifs" /></a> Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 I love out of the 4 players they've highlighted as the worst and who'd be hard to shift, 3 have gone on to be easily our best players from that list. I also think I can remember reading an article at the back end of last season where the Mail had tipped us to go down another division at the start of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 According to the guardian, Barton earns £67 000 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/jan/11/joey-barton-newcastle-aston-villa One might speculate that Enrique is on similar wages, since he was signed during a period where we were quite generous with salaries.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 Well that's me convinced. Jose = greedy cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 I can imagine that Enrique is on 40-45k/week, or something around that without knowing really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 At the most. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 Not likely, first of all, Enrique signed the same year as Barton, which puts both under the same "salary regime"= hurling money out the window. Second, Enrique was very sought after when we bought him. The newspapers were stunned that he actually signed for us, because other successful clubs were after him. That leads me to conclude that he signed because we offered him more money than any other clubs involved. But I don't think the main obstacle for Enrique. He wants the club to match his ambitions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 If Xisco's on 45k per week, then Enrique will be on similar, if not more than that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 Not likely, first of all, Enrique signed the same year as Barton, which puts both under the same "salary regime"= hurling money out the window. Second, Enrique was very sought after when we bought him. The newspapers were stunned that he actually signed for us, because other successful clubs were after him. That leads me to conclude that he signed because we offered him more money than any other clubs involved. But I don't think the main obstacle for Enrique. He wants the club to match his ambitions. Barton was already on 40k plus a week at Man City, Enrique was on peanuts in Spain. There is no way he is earning anything like Barton, ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 One of the NE journalists on twitter said Jose isn't on big wages like Barton, Smith etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now